IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
There is no need to differentiation between clustered VG and normal VG.
As the activation depends on locking type.
Use unconditionally locally exclusive activation for pvmove.
Whenever pvmove tree is going to be generated for suspend
and such LV has a user - use this 'using LV' to generate
correct dm tree holding all components.
LV is asked for resume, and its already resume and tool
is inside 'critical_section()' check if there is any suspended sub LV.
In that case 'resume' operation will not be skipped.
When activation of LVs fails prior pvmove start, try to deactivate
already activated LVs.
TODO: possibly remember which LVs where already activate and only those
take down - devices which are already in-use will stay active.
Only lv_committed() now uses vg->vg_committed and it appears redundant
if its contents match the enclosing VG so don't waste cycles creating it
when that's known to be true when no write lock is held so the struct
won't get modified.
- Use 'lvmcache' consistently instead of 'metadata cache'
- Always use 5 characters for source line number
- Remember to convert uuids into printable form
- Use <no name> rather than (null) when VG has no name.
The persistent filter should not be imported by any command that doesn't
use it so take addtional note of REQUIRES_FULL_LABEL_SCAN (for vgrename)
and introduce IGNORE_PERSISTENT_FILTER for vgscan and pvscan.
If the suspend/resume sequence would leave some device in suspend
for possible later resume, backup cannot be takes (fs holding backups
could be still frozen in critical section())
Move check for presence of raid4 into the right place
so there is no way how to hit activation of any LV
with raid4 on kernel which does not support it.
Commit 763db8aab0 rejects 2-legged
conversions to striped/raid0 but different messages are displayed
for raid0 or striped. This commit provides the same rejection messages.
raid4/5 LVs may only be converted to striped or raid0/raid0_meta
in case they have at least 3 legs. 2-legged raid4/5 are a result
of either converting a raid1 to raid4/5 (takeover) or converting
a raid4/5 with more than 2 legs to raid1 with 2 legs (reshape).
The raid4/5 personalities map those as raid1,
thus reject conversion to striped/raid0.
Resolves: rhbz1511047
