IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
For dev_in_device_list() != 0 allocated 'devl' was
actually leaking - so instead allocate 'devl' only
when !dev_in_device_list() and indent code around.
Since we check for NULL pointers earlier we need
to be consistent across function - since the NULL
would applies across whole function.
When dropping 'mda' check - we are actually
already dereferencing it before - so it can't
be NULL at that places (and it's validated
before entering _read_mda_header_and_metadata).
dev_unset_last_byte() must be called while the fd is still valid.
After a write error, dev_unset_last_byte() must be called before
closing the dev and resetting the fd.
In the write error path, dev_unset_last_byte() was being called
after label_scan_invalidate() which meant that it would not unset
the last_byte values.
After a write error, dev_unset_last_byte() is now called in
dev_write_bytes() before label_scan_invalidate(), instead of by
the caller of dev_write_bytes().
In the common case of a successful write, the sequence is still:
dev_set_last_byte(); dev_write_bytes(); dev_unset_last_byte();
Signed-off-by: Zhao Heming <heming.zhao@suse.com>
When resizing 2 volumes like thin-pool and it's metadata and they
would be of a different type - command would be actually expecting
both LVs being of a same segtype - and would throw an error in
case they are different.
This patch fixes is by setting a new segtype from last segment of
2nd. extented device.
Also it fixes the possible 'percentage' extension setup that
might have been used for 'primary' volume - while the 'secondary'
LV always goes with direct size - as we do not support 'percentage'
setup for them
This affects maily usage of thin-pool where the extension of
thin-pool data size may also lead to extension of metadata size.
When running cluster test with clvmd, the actual 'monitoring'
happens in cluster - so the 'already monitored' message
is also logged within clvmd code and the command cannot
see such effect.
clvmd was incapable to report this information back to command
so it cannot be displayed this way.
Add 'lvs -o+seg_monitor' validation which also works in clustered mode.
Instead of checking all LVs in a VG - do just a direct copy of LVs
from the existing list ->segs_using_thin_lv.
TODO: maybe it could be better to expose seg_list to /tools...
Enhance lv_info with lv_info_with_name_check.
This 'variant' not only check existance if UUID in DM table
but also compares its DM name whether it's matching expected LV name.
Otherwise activation may 'skip' activation with rename in case the
DM UUID already exists, just device is different name.
This change make fairly easier manipulation with i.e. detached mirror
leg which ATM is using same UUID - just the LV name have been changed.
Used code was not able to run 'activation' (and do a rename) and just
skipped the call. So the code used to do a workaround and 'tried'
to deactivate such LV firts - this however work only in non-clvmd case,
as cluster was not having the lock for deactivated LV.
With this extended lv_info code will run 'activation' and will
synchronize the name to match expected LV name.
Patch extends _lv_info() with new paramter 'with_name_check',
which is later translated into 'name_check' argument for
_info_run() which in case of name mismatch evaluates the
check as if device does not exists.
Such call is only used in one place _lv_activate() which then
let activation run. All other invocation of _info() calls
are left intact.
TODO: fix mirror table manipulation (and raid)....
Avoid making more dbus calls to get information we already have. This
also avoids us getting an error where a dbus object representation is
being deleted by another process while we are trying to gather information
about it across the wire.
When a LV loses an interface it ends up getting removed and recreated.
This happens after the VGs have been processed and updated. Thus when
this happens we need to re-check the VGs.
VDO pool LVs are represented by a new dbus interface VgVdo. Currently
the interface only has additional VDO properties, but when the
ability to support additional LV creation is added we can add a method
to the interface.
