IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The recent fix 05c2b10c5d ensures that raid LV images are not
using the same devices. This was happening in the lvextend commands
used by this test, so fix the test to use more devices to ensue
redundancy.
In case of e.g. 3 PVs, creating or extending a RaidLV causes SubLV
collocation thus putting segments of diffent rimage (and potentially
larger rmeta) SubLVs onto the same PV. For redundant RaidLVs this'll
compromise redundancy. Fix by detecting such bogus allocation on
lvcreate/lvextend and reject the request.
lvreduce uses _lvseg_get_stripes() which was unable to get raid stripe
info with an integrity layer present. This caused lvreduce on a
raid+integrity LV to fail prematurely when checking stripe parameters.
An unhelpful error message about stripe size would be printed.
There is no easy way to detect, whether device supports zeroing,
and kernel also zeroes device when it's not directly supported,
but with extra message:
operation not supported error, dev X, sector Y op 0x9:(WRITE_ZEROES)...
So to avoid generating such message with every 'lvcreate', use for
zeroing of upto 8K just standard write of zeroed page.
(maybe we can go with even larger sizes).
Remove old code that became incorrect at some point.
It's probably a fragment of an old condition that was left
behind because it wasn't understood. We don't want to drop
the MISSING_PV flag just because the PV has no mda in use.
The device that was missing may have stale data, so the user
needs to decide if the device should be removed or restored.
It looks like force was not being used to enable crypt resize,
but rather to force an inconsistency between LV and crypt
sizes, so this is either not needed or force in this case
should have some other meaning.
This reverts commit ed808a9b54.
Update previous commit
"lvresize: only resize crypt when fs resize is enabled"
to enable crypt resizing when --force is set and --resizefs
is not set. This is because it's been allowed in the past
and people have used it, but it's not a good idea.
There were a couple of cases where lvresize, without --fs resize,
was resizing the crypt layer above the LV. Resizing the crypt
layer should only be done when fs resizing is enabled (even if the
fs is already small enough due to being independently reduced.)
Also, check the size of the crypt device to see if it's already
been reduced independently, and skip the cryptsetup resize if
it's not needed.
Enhance checking vdo constains so it also handles changes of active VDO LVs
where only added difference is considered now.
For this also the reported informational message about used memory
was improved to only list consuming RAM blocks.
Introduce struct vdo_pool_size_config usable to calculate necessary
memory size for active VDO volume.
Function lv_vdo_pool_size_config() is able to read out this
configuration out of runtime DM table line.
18722dfdf4 lvresize: restructure code
mistakenly changed the overprovisioning check from applying
to all lv_is_thin_type lvs to only lv_is_thin_pool lvs, so
it no longer applied when extending thin lvs. The result
was missing warning messages when extending thin lvs.
When executing process_each_lv_in_vg, we process live LVs first and
after that, we process any historical LVs. In case we have just removed
an LV, which also means we have just made it "historical" and so it
appears as fresh item in vg->historical_lvs list, we have to skip it
when we get to processing historical LVs inside the same process_each_lv_in_vg
call.
The simplest approach here, without introducing another LV list, is to
simply mark such historical LVs as "fresh" directly in struct
historical_logical_volume when we have just removed the original LV
and created the historical LV for it. Then, we just need to check the
flag when processing historical LVs and skip it if it is "fresh".
When we read historical LVs out of metadata, they are marked as
"not fresh" and so they can be processed as usual.
This was mainly an issue in conjuction with -S|--select use:
# lvmconfig --type diff
metadata {
record_lvs_history=1
}
(In this example, a thin pool with lvol1 thin LV and lvol2 and lvol3 snapshots.)
# lvs -H vg -o name,pool_lv,full_ancestors,full_descendants
LV Pool FAncestors FDescendants
lvol1 pool lvol2,lvol3
lvol2 pool lvol1 lvol3
lvol3 pool lvol2,lvol1
pool
# lvremove -S 'name=lvol2'
Logical volume "lvol2" successfully removed.
Historical logical volume "lvol2" successfully removed.
...here, the historical LV lvol2 should not have been removed because
we have just removed its original non-historical lvol2 and the fresh
historical lvol2 must not be included in the same processing spree.
The new option "--fs String" for lvresize/lvreduce/lvextend
controls the handling of file systems before/after resizing
the LV. --resizefs is the same as --fs resize.
The new option "--fsmode String" can be used to control
mounting and unmounting of the fs during resizing.
Possible --fs values:
checksize
Only applies to reducing size; does nothing for extend.
Check the fs size and reduce the LV if the fs is not using
the affected space, i.e. the fs does not need to be shrunk.
Fail the command without reducing the fs or LV if the fs is
using the affected space.
resize
Resize the fs using the fs-specific resize command.
This may include mounting, unmounting, or running fsck.
See --fsmode to control mounting behavior, and --nofsck to
disable fsck.
resize_fsadm
Use the old method of calling fsadm to handle the fs
(deprecated.) Warning: this option does not prevent lvreduce
from destroying file systems that are unmounted (or mounted
if prompts are skipped.)
ignore
Resize the LV without checking for or handling a file system.
Warning: using ignore when reducing the LV size may destroy the
file system.
Possible --fsmode values:
manage
Mount or unmount the fs as needed to resize the fs,
and attempt to restore the original mount state at the end.
nochange
Do not mount or unmount the fs. If mounting or unmounting
is required to resize the fs, then do not resize the fs or
the LV and fail the command.
offline
Unmount the fs if it is mounted, and resize the fs while it
is unmounted. If mounting is required to resize the fs,
then do not resize the fs or the LV and fail the command.
Notes on lvreduce:
When no --fs or --resizefs option is specified:
. lvextend default behavior is fs ignore.
. lvreduce default behavior is fs checksize
(includes activating the LV.)
With the exception of --fs resize_fsadm|ignore, lvreduce requires
the recent libblkid fields FSLASTBLOCK and FSBLOCKSIZE.
FSLASTBLOCK*FSBLOCKSIZE is the last byte used by the fs on the LV,
which determines if reducing the fs is necessary.
Names matching internal code layout.
Functionc in thin_manip.c uses thin_pool in its name.
Keep 'pool' only for function working for both cache and thin pools.
No change of functionality.
When lvcreate is makeing VDO pool and user has not specified -V size,
ATM we actually run 'vdoformat' twice to get properly 'extent' aligned
size matching lvm2 properties - so the 2nd. run of vdoformat actually
can stay with 'log_verbose()' so the standard printed result
is not showing confusing info (which is now also correctly using
print_unless_silent)
When creating VDO pool based of % values, lvm2 is now more clever
and avoids to create 'unsupportable' sizes of physical backend
volumes as 16TiB is maximum size supported by VDO target
(and also limited by maximum supportable slabs (8192) based on slab
size.
If the requested virtual size is approaching max supported size 4PiB,
switch header size to 0.
Newer VDO kernel target require to have matching virtual size - this
however cause incompatiblity when lvcreate is let to format VDO data
device and read the usable size from vdoformat.
Altough this is a kernel regression and will likely get fixed,
lvm2 can actually reformat VDO device to use properly aligned VDO LV
size to make this problem disappear.
Add function to check for avaialble memory for particular VDO
configuration - to avoid unnecessary machine swapping for configs
that will not fit into memory (possibly in locked section).
Formula tries to estimate RAM size machine can use also with
swapping for kernel target - but still leaving some amount of
usable RAM.
Estimation is based on documented RAM usage of VDO target.
If the /proc/meminfo would be theoretically unavailable, try to use
'sysinfo()' function, however this is giving only free RAM without
the knowledge about how much RAM could be eventually swapped.
TODO: move _get_memory_info() into generic lvm2 API function used
by other targets with non-trivial memory requirements.
