IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Example:
/dev/loop0 and /dev/loop1 are duplicates,
created by copying one backing file to the
other.
'identity /dev/loopX' creates an identity
mapping for loopX named idmloopX, which
adds a duplicate for the named device.
The duplicate selection code for lvmetad is
incomplete, and lvmetad is disabled for this
example.
[~]# losetup -f loopfile0
[~]# pvs
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/loop0 foo lvm2 a-- 308.00m 296.00m
[~]# losetup -f loopfile1
[~]# pvs
Found duplicate PV LnSOEqzEYED3RvIOa5PZP2s7uyuBLmAV: using /dev/loop1 not /dev/loop0
Using duplicate PV /dev/loop1 which is more recent, replacing /dev/loop0
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/loop1 foo lvm2 a-- 308.00m 308.00m
[~]# ./identity /dev/loop0
[~]# pvs
Found duplicate PV LnSOEqzEYED3RvIOa5PZP2s7uyuBLmAV: using /dev/loop1 not /dev/loop0
Using duplicate PV /dev/loop1 without holders, replacing /dev/loop0
Found duplicate PV LnSOEqzEYED3RvIOa5PZP2s7uyuBLmAV: using /dev/mapper/idmloop0 not /dev/loop1
Using duplicate PV /dev/mapper/idmloop0 from subsystem DM, replacing /dev/loop1
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/mapper/idmloop0 foo lvm2 a-- 308.00m 296.00m
[~]# ./identity /dev/loop1
[~]# pvs
WARNING: duplicate PV LnSOEqzEYED3RvIOa5PZP2s7uyuBLmAV is being used from both devices /dev/loop0 and /dev/loop1
Found duplicate PV LnSOEqzEYED3RvIOa5PZP2s7uyuBLmAV: using /dev/loop1 not /dev/loop0
Using duplicate PV /dev/loop1 which is more recent, replacing /dev/loop0
Found duplicate PV LnSOEqzEYED3RvIOa5PZP2s7uyuBLmAV: using /dev/mapper/idmloop0 not /dev/loop1
Using duplicate PV /dev/mapper/idmloop0 from subsystem DM, replacing /dev/loop1
Found duplicate PV LnSOEqzEYED3RvIOa5PZP2s7uyuBLmAV: using /dev/mapper/idmloop1 not /dev/mapper/idmloop0
Using duplicate PV /dev/mapper/idmloop1 which is more recent, replacing /dev/mapper/idmloop0
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/mapper/idmloop1 foo lvm2 a-- 308.00m 308.00m
Describe
thin_check_options, thin_repair_options,
cache_check_option, scache_repair_options
as a "list of options", rather than a "string of options"
because a single string, e.g. "-q --clear-needs-check-flag"
does not work, and needs to be entered as a list,
e.g. ["-q", "--clear-needs-check-flag"]
The settings which have their default value evaluated in runtime should
have their 'unconfigured' counterparts also evaluated in runtime since
those values can be constructed by using other settings.
For example, before this patch:
$ lvm dumpconfig --type default --unconfigured devices/cache_dir devices/cache
cache_dir="@DEFAULT_SYS_DIR@/@DEFAULT_CACHE_SUBDIR@"
cache="/etc/lvm/cache/.cache
With this patch applied:
$ lvm dumpconfig --type default --unconfigured devices/cache_dir devices/cache
cache_dir="@DEFAULT_SYS_DIR@/@DEFAULT_CACHE_SUBDIR@"
cache="@DEFAULT_SYS_DIR@/@DEFAULT_CACHE_SUBDIR@/.cache"
The @something@ used for unconfigured default value is not bound to
CFG_TYPE_STRING settings defined in config_settings.h, it can be
used for any other config type too.
When test is executed on real device - lets try a more complete
cleanup - discard whole device first and try to wipe any
headers it might be left from previous test.
Show full chain of ancestors and descendants for snapshots
(both thick and thin - in case of thick, the "ancestor" field
is actually equal to "origin" field as snapshots can't be
chained for thick snapshots).
These fields display current state as it is, they do not
display any history! If the snapshot chain is broken in
the middle, we don't report the historical origin (this
is going to be a part of another patch and a different
set of fields or just a switch for existing fields to
show ancestors and descendants with history included).
For example:
(origin --> snapshot)
lvol1 --> lvol2 --> lvol3 --> lvol4
\
--> lvol5 --> lvol6 --> lvol7 --> lvol8
$ lvs -o name,pool_lv,origin,ancestors,descendants vg
LV Pool Origin Ancestors Descendants
lvol1 pool lvol2,lvol3,lvol4,lvol5,lvol6,lvol7,lvol8
lvol2 pool lvol1 lvol1 lvol3,lvol4,lvol5,lvol6,lvol7,lvol8
lvol3 pool lvol2 lvol2,lvol1 lvol4
lvol4 pool lvol3 lvol3,lvol2,lvol1
lvol5 pool lvol2 lvol2,lvol1 lvol6,lvol7,lvol8
lvol6 pool lvol5 lvol5,lvol2,lvol1 lvol7,lvol8
lvol7 pool lvol6 lvol6,lvol5,lvol2,lvol1 lvol8
lvol8 pool lvol7 lvol7,lvol6,lvol5,lvol2,lvol1
Scenario:
$ vgs -o+vg_mda_copies
VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree #VMdaCps
fedora 1 2 0 wz--n- 9.51g 0 unmanaged
vg 16 9 0 wz--n- 1.94g 1.83g 2
$ lvs -o+read_ahead vg/lvol6 vg/lvol7
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Rahead
lvol6 vg Vwi-a-tz-- 1.00g pool lvol5 0.00 auto
lvol7 vg Vwi---tz-k 1.00g pool lvol6 256.00k
Before this patch:
$vgs -o vg_name,vg_mda_copies -S 'vg_mda_copies < unmanaged'
VG #VMdaCps
vg 2
Problem:
Reserved values can be only used with exact match = or !=, not <,<=,>,>=.
In the example above, the "unamanaged" is internally represented as
18446744073709551615, but this should be ignored while not comparing
field directly with "unmanaged" reserved name with = or !=. Users
should not be aware of this internal mapping of the reserved value
name to its internal value and hence it doesn't make sense for such
reserved value to take place in results of <,<=,> and >=.
There's no order defined for reserved values!!! It's a special
*reserved* value that is taken out of the usual value range
of that type.
This is very similar to what we have already fixed with
2f7f6932dc, but it's the other way round
now - we're using reserved value name in selection criteria now
(in the patch 2f7f693, we had concrete value and we compared it
with the reserved value). So this patch completes patch 2f7f693.
This patch also fixes this problem:
$ lvs -o+read_ahead vg/lvol6 vg/lvol7 -S 'read_ahead > 32k'
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Rahead
lvol6 vg Vwi-a-tz-- 1.00g pool lvol5 0.00 auto
lvol7 vg Vwi---tz-k 1.00g pool lvol6 256.00k
Problem:
In the example above, the internal reserved value "auto" is in the
range of selection "> 32k" - it shouldn't match as well. Here the
"auto" is internally represented as MAX_DBL and of course, numerically,
MAX_DBL > 256k. But for users, the reserved value should be uncomparable
to any number so the mapping of the reserved value name to its interna
value is transparent to users. Again, there's no order defined for
reserved values and hence it should never match if using <,<=,>,>=
operators.
This is actually exactly the same problem as already described in
2f7f6932dc, but that patch failed for
size field types because of incorrect internal representation used.
With this patch applied, both problematic scenarios mentioned
above are fixed now:
$ vgs -o vg_name,vg_mda_copies -S 'vg_mda_copies < unmanaged'
(blank)
$ lvs -o+read_ahead vg/lvol6 vg/lvol7 -S 'read_ahead > 32k'
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Rahead
lvol7 vg Vwi---tz-k 1.00g pool lvol6 256.00k
When test suite is used from installed rpm package
we need to handle things better.
This patch is rather first approach - expecting few more
tweaks needed.
At this moment LVM_LOG_FILE_EPOCH with
LVM_EXPECTED_EXIT_STATUS properly deletes debug logs
only for real commands - support for lvm2 API does not yet
exists
By default these are empty strings, so the config settings
should be flagged as undefined, so they will be commented
out of the generated config. Otherwise, the lines:
thin_repair_options=""
cache_repair_options=""
in the dump output cause a warning when processed since
lvm doesn't want an empty string.
Also regenerate lvm.conf.in.
The specific config settings have been removed
from the lvm.conf(5) man page, and replaced with
a description of how to use lvm dumpconfig to
view the settings.
The sample lvm.conf and lvmlocal.conf files are now generated:
example.conf.base - initial ungenerated part of the file
example.conf.gen - generated portion from dumpconfig
example.conf.in - combination of .base and .gen files
example.conf - result of configure processing .in file
lvmlocal.conf.base - initial ungenerated part of the file
lvmlocal.conf.gen - generated portion from dumpconfig
lvmlocal.conf.in - combination of .base and .gen files
lvmlocal.conf - result of configure processing .in file
Do not edit the .in files, but edit config_settings.h
or the .base files, and then use 'make generate' to create
the new .in files.
- configure
with options
- make
creates tools/lvm
- make generate
uses tools/lvm to create example.conf.in and lvmlocal.conf.in
by combining .base files with dumpconfig output.
- configure
with same options as above
creates example.conf and lvmlocal.conf from .in files
With use_lvmetad=0, duplicate PVs /dev/loop0 and /dev/loop1,
where in this example, /dev/loop1 is the cached device
referenced by pv->dev, the command 'pvs /dev/loop0' reports:
Failed to find physical volume "/dev/loop0".
This is because the duplicate PV detection by pvid is
not working because _get_all_devices() is not setting
any dev->pvid for any entries. This is because the
pvid information has not yet been saved in lvmcache.
This is fixed by calling _get_vgnameids_on_system()
before _get_all_devices(), which has the effect of
caching the necessary pvid information.
With this fix, running pvs /dev/loop0, or pvs /dev/loop1,
produces no error and one line of output for the PV (the
device printed is the one cached in pv->dev, in this
example /dev/loop1.)
Running 'pvs /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1' produces no error
and two lines of output, with each device displayed
on one of the lines.
Running 'pvs -a' shows two PVs, one with loop0 and one
with loop1, and both shown as a member of the same VG.
Running 'pvs' shows only one of the duplicate PVs,
and that shows the device cached in pv->dev (loop1).
The above output is what the duplicate handling code
was previously designed to output in commits:
b64da4d8b5 toollib: search for duplicate PVs only when needed
3a7c47af0e toollib: pvs -a should display VG name for each duplicate PV
57d74a45a0 toollib: override the PV device with duplicates
c1f246fedf toollib: handle duplicate pvs in process_in_pv
As a further step after this, we may choose to change
some of those.
For all of these commands, a warning is printed about
the existence of the duplicate PVs:
Found duplicate PV ...: using /dev/loop1 not /dev/loop0
Rename envvar LVM_LOG_FILE_UNLINK_STATUS to LVM_EXPECTED_EXIT_STATUS
and change compare sign from '!' to '>'.
Validate LVM_LOG_FILE_EPOCH and support strictly only
up-to 32 alpha chars. If the content doesn't pass
epoch is simply ignored.
