IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
'lvdisplay -m' tried to go through NULL policy settings,
when such policy was not defined for CachedLV.
Patch is fixing display of cache-pool without defined settings,
as this is now a valid pool and we mostly want users to define
these settings when actually really caching a LV.
Since cache LV can be a stacked device, there is no real reason
trying to use slight optimised tree for origin_only cache reload
(it could be even wrongly implemented in this case).
We can easily go with stardard tree load here.
When user runs command like 'lvconvert --splitcache' the operation
might be actually either slow or not making any progress in kernel,
so lets give user a chance to abort such operation.
When user press 'Ctrl+C' device table is restored to pre-flushing state.
Remove explicit activation of SubLVs and let lv_update_and_reload()
perform the proper (pre-)loading sequencing of tables.
This avoids related callback functions which are removed.
Related: rhbz1448116
Related: rhbz1461526
Related: rhbz1448123
When lock-holding LV differs from actually request locked LV,
we drop origin_only flag as it has no use - it'd be applied
on completely different LV.
Example of problem:
Raid is thin-pool _tdata LV.
Raid run origin_only locking on stacked device.
As lock holder is discovered thinLV.
Whole origin_only operation is then applied only on thinLV
changing the meaning of whole operation.
NOTE: this patch does not change anything for LV that are
already top-level lock holding LVs (i.e. thinLVs, snahoshots/origins).
Disable until we have a proper fix for reshape space allocation,
switching it to begin/end of rimages and activation in the cluster.
Related: rhbz1448116
Related: rhbz1461526
Related: rhbz1448123
Commit 1fe4f80e45 in current version
introduced regression for a terminal user, as he could not enter 'n'
as answer. Add missing break for this case (No whats_new).
New tests to add checking for '100%' in-sync at start of "recover"
process (it shouldn't happen, but I've seen it before). Also,
check status over the whole cycle of various sync processes ("resync"
and "recover").
Enhance reporting code, so it does not need to do 'extra' ioctl to
get 'status' of normal raid and provide percentage directly.
When we have 'merging' snapshot into raid origin, we still need to get
this secondary number with extra status call - however, since 'raid'
is always a single segment LV - we may skip 'copy_percent' call as
we directly know the percent and also with better precision.
NOTE: for mirror we still base reported number on the percetage of
transferred extents which might get quite imprecisse if big size
of extent is used while volume itself is smaller as reporting jump
steps are much bigger the actual reported number provides.
2nd.NOTE: raid lvs line report already requires quite a few extra status
calls for the same device - but fix will be need slight code improval.
Current existing kernels reports status sometimes in weird form.
Instead of showing what is the exact progress, we need to estimate
this in-sync state from several surrounding states.
Main reason here is to never report 100% sync state for a raid device
which will be undergoing i.e. recovery.
Relative to last comit ddf2a1d656:
adjust the dm-raid target version to 1.12.0 which shows
mandatory kernel MD deadlock fixes related to reshaping
are presant in the kernel.
Related: rhbz1443999
First test in this file checks whether 'aa' is ever spotted during
a "recover" operation (it should not be). More tests should follow
in this file to look for oddities in status output - especially as
it relates to the sync_ratio, dev_health, and sync_action fields.
For the test clean-up, I was providing too many devices to the first
command - possibly allowing it to allocate in the wrong place. I was
also not providing a device for the second command - virtually ensuring
the test was not performing correctly at times.
This patch ensures that under normal conditions (i.e. not during repair
operations) that users are prevented from removing devices that would
cause data loss.
When a RAID1 is undergoing its initial sync, it is ok to remove all but
one of the images because they have all existed since creation and
contain all the data written since the array was created. OTOH, if the
RAID1 was created as a result of an up-convert from linear, it is very
important not to let the user remove the primary image (the source of
all the data). They should be allowed to remove any devices they want
and as many as they want as long as one original (primary) device is left
during a "recover" (aka up-convert).
This fixes bug 1461187 and includes the necessary regression tests.
Add the checks necessary to distiguish the state of a RAID when the primary
source for syncing fails during the "recover" process.
It has been possible to hit this condition before (like when converting from
2-way RAID1 to 3-way and having the first two devices die during the "recover"
process). However, this condition is now more likely since we treat linear ->
RAID1 conversions as "recover" now - so it is especially important we cleanly
handle this condition.
Previously, we were treating non-RAID to RAID up-converts as a "resync"
operation. (The most common example being 'linear -> RAID1'.) RAID to
RAID up-converts or rebuilds of specific RAID images are properly treated
as a "recover" operation.
Since we were treating some up-convert operations as "resync", it was
possible to have scenarios where data corruption or data loss were
possibilities if the RAID hadn't been able to sync completely before a
loss of the primary source devices. In order to ensure that the user took
the proper precautions in such scenarios, we required a '--force' option
to be present. Unfortuneately, the force option was rendered useless
because there was no way to distiguish the failure state of a potentially
destructive repair from a nominal one - making the '--force' option a
requirement for any RAID1 repair!
We now treat non-RAID to RAID up-converts properly as "recover" operations.
This eliminates the scenarios that can potentially cause data loss or
data corruption; and this eliminates the need for the '--force' requirement.
This patch removes the requirement to specify '--force' for RAID repairs.
Two of the sync actions performed by the kernel (aka MD runtime) are
"resync" and "recover". The "resync" refers to when an entirely new array
is going through the process of initializing (or resynchronizing after an
unexpected shutdown). The "recover" is the process of initializing a new
member device to the array. So, a brand new array with all new devices
will undergo "resync". An array with replaced or added sub-LVs will undergo
"recover".
These two states are treated very differently when failures happen. If any
device is lost or replaced while "resync", there are no worries. This is
because any writes created from the inception of the array have occurred to
all the devices and can be safely recovered. Even though non-initialized
portions will still be resync'ed with uninitialized data, it is ok. However,
if a pre-existing device is lost (aka, the original linear device in a
linear -> raid1 convert) during a "recover", data loss can be the result.
Thus, writes are errored by the kernel and recovery is halted. The failed
device must be restored or removed. This is the correct behavior.
Unfortunately, we were treating an up-convert from linear as a "resync"
when we should have been treating it as a "recover". This patch
removes the special case for linear upconvert. It allows each new image
sub-LV to be marked with a rebuild flag and treats the array as 'in-sync'.
This has the correct effect of causing the upconvert to be treated as a
"recover" rather than a "resync". There is no need to flag these two states
differently in LVM metadata, because they are already considered differently
by the kernel RAID metadata. (Any activation/deactivation will properly
resume the "recover" process and not a "resync" process.)
We make this behavior change based on the presense of dm-raid target
version 1.9.0+.
