IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This updates the test logic for CLI extensions, actually checking
for functional output from the subcommand.
It also cleans up some environmental leftover.
This adds some logic to detect and dispatch unknown subcommands to
extensions available in `$PATH`. Additional commands can be
implemented by adding relevant `ostree-$verb` binaries to the system.
As an example, if a `/usr/bin/ostree-extcommand` extension is provided,
the execution of `ostree extcommand --help` will be dispatched to that
as `ostree-extcommand extcommand --help`.
This is trying to address:
https://pagure.io/fedora-iot/issue/48
Basically we changed rpm-ostree to start doing a shared lock during
commit by default, but this broke because pungi is starting a process
doing a commit for each architecture, and then trying to regenerate
the summary after each one.
This patch is deleting a big comment with a rationale for why
summary regeneration should be exclusive. Point by point:
> This makes sure the commits and deltas don't get
> deleted while generating the summary.
But prune operations require an exclusive lock, which means that
data still can't be deleted when the summary grabs a shared lock.
> It also means we can be sure refs
> won't be created/updated/deleted during the operation, without having to
> add exclusive locks to those operations which would prevent concurrent
> commits from working.
First: The status quo *has* prevented concurrent commits from working!
There is no real locking solution to this problem. What we really
need to do here is regenerate the summary after each commit *or*
when the caller decides to do it and e.g. include deltas at the same
time.
It's OK if multiple threads race to regenerate the summary;
last-one-wins behavior here is totally fine.
We should only try to remount `/sysroot` if we're actually handling the
sysroot repo and the repo isn't writable. We already have public APIs to
check each of those, so let's use them.
Closes: #2485
This moves read-only sysroot checks upfront, so that they are not
intermixed with mount operations.
It has no immediate side-effects, but allow these check to be
independent from the rest of the mounting logic (and future changes
to it).
This adds a `MS_SILENT` flag to all `mount(2)` calls, reducing the
amount of kernel logs produced on each boot.
Those messages do not contain actionable details, and in the "mount
plus read-only remount" case they can easily become highly redundant.
This reworks the var-mount destructive test in order to properly use
the datadir for the current stateroot instead of a duplicated one.
In turn, it ensures that the resulting `var.mount` after reboot is
correctly pointing to the same location which hosted `/var` on the
previous boot.
Followup to https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/2463
One thing I noticed here is we lost usage of `build-check.sh`
which also invokes `clang`, which doesn't speak `-fanalyzer`
and would be broken by this if we try to enable `build-check.sh`
again. But that can come later.
