IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Make sure dns_name_normalize(), dns_name_concat(), dns_name_is_valid()
do not accept/generate invalidly long hostnames, i.e. longer than 253
characters.
Labels of zero length are not OK, refuse them early on. The concept of a
"zero-length label" doesn't exist, a zero-length full domain name
however does (representing the root domain). See RFC 2181, Section 11.
This way, directories created later for containers or for
journald-remote, will be readable by adm & wheel groups by default,
similarly to /var/log/journal/%m itself.
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1971
When we have non-owner user or group entries, we need the mask
for the acl to be valid. But acl_calc_mask() calculates the mask
to include all permissions, even those that were masked before.
Apparently this happens when we inherit *:r-x permissions from
a parent directory — the kernel sets *:r-x, mask:r--, effectively
masking the executable bit. acl_calc_mask() would set the mask:r-x,
effectively enabling the bit. To avoid this, be more conservative when
to add the mask entry: first iterate over all entries, and do nothing
if a mask.
This returns the code closer to J.A.Steffens' original version
in v204-90-g23ad4dd884.
Should fix https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1977.
For now, only add_acls_for_user is tested. When run under root, it
actually sets the acls. When run under non-root, it sets the acls for
the user, which does nothing, but at least calls the functions.
Most of the function is moved to acl-util.c to make it possible to
add tests in subsequent commit.
Setting of the mode in server_fix_perms is removed:
- we either just created the file ourselves, and the permission be better right,
- or the file was already there, and we should not modify the permissions.
server_fix_perms is renamed to server_fix_acls to better reflect new
meaning, and made static because it is only used in one file.
This renames __useless_struct_to_allow_trailing_semicolon__ everywhere
to _sd_useless_struct_to_allow_trailing_semicolon_, to follow our usual
rule of prefixing stuff from public headers that should be considered
internal with "_sd_".
While we are at it, also to be safe: when the struct is used in the C++
protector macros make sure to use two different names depending on
whether it appears in the C++ or C side of things. After all, there
might be compilers that don't consider C++ and C structs the same.
See https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/2052#discussion_r46067059
Let's distuingish the cases where our code takes an active role in
selinux management, or just passively reports whatever selinux
properties are set.
mac_selinux_have() now checks whether selinux is around for the passive
stuff, and mac_selinux_use() for the active stuff. The latter checks the
former, plus also checks UID == 0, under the assumption that only when
we run priviliged selinux management really makes sense.
Fixes: #1941
The header file defines some helpers for GLIBC NSS and doesn't include
anything else but glibc headers, hence there's little reason to keep it
in shared/.
See: #2008
GLIB has recently started to officially support the gcc cleanup
attribute in its public API, hence let's do the same for our APIs.
With this patch we'll define an xyz_unrefp() call for each public
xyz_unref() call, to make it easy to use inside a
__attribute__((cleanup())) expression. Then, all code is ported over to
make use of this.
The new calls are also documented in the man pages, with examples how to
use them (well, I only added docs where the _unref() call itself already
had docs, and the examples, only cover sd_bus_unrefp() and
sd_event_unrefp()).
This also renames sd_lldp_free() to sd_lldp_unref(), since that's how we
tend to call our destructors these days.
Note that this defines no public macro that wraps gcc's attribute and
makes it easier to use. While I think it's our duty in the library to
make our stuff easy to use, I figure it's not our duty to make gcc's own
features easy to use on its own. Most likely, client code which wants to
make use of this should define its own:
#define _cleanup_(function) __attribute__((cleanup(function)))
Or similar, to make the gcc feature easier to use.
Making this logic public has the benefit that we can remove three header
files whose only purpose was to define these functions internally.
See #2008.
If pid < 0 after fork(), 0 is always returned because r =
exec_context_load_environment() has exited successfully.
This will make the caller of exec_spawn() not able to handle
the fork() error case and make systemd abort assert() possibly.
This is often needed for proper DNSSEC support, and even to handle AAAA records
without falling back to TCP.
If the path between the client and server is fully compliant, this should always
work, however, that is not the case, and overlarge packets will get mysteriously
lost in some cases.
For that reason, we use a similar fallback mechanism as we do for palin EDNS0,
EDNS0+DO, etc.:
The large UDP size feature is different from the other supported feature, as we
cannot simply verify that it works based on receiving a reply (as the server
will usually send us much smaller packets than what we claim to support, so
simply receiving a reply does not mean much).
For that reason, we keep track of the largest UDP packet we ever received, as this
is the smallest known good size (defaulting to the standard 512 bytes). If
announcing the default large size of 4096 fails (in the same way as the other
features), we fall back to the known good size. The same logic of retrying after a
grace-period applies.
This indicates that we can handle DNSSEC records (per RFC3225), even if
all we do is silently drop them. This feature requires EDNS0 support.
As we do not yet support larger UDP packets, this feature increases the
risk of getting truncated packets.
Similarly to how we fall back to plain UDP if EDNS0 fails, we will fall
back to plain EDNS0 if EDNS0+DO fails (with the same logic of remembering
success and retrying after a grace period after failure).
This is a minimal implementation of RFC6891. Only default values
are used, so in reality this will be a noop.
EDNS0 support is dependent on the current server's feature level,
so appending the OPT pseudo RR is done when the packet is emitted,
rather than when it is assembled. To handle different feature
levels on retransmission, we strip off the OPT RR again after
sending the packet.
Similarly, to how we fall back to TCP if UDP fails, we fall back
to plain UDP if EDNS0 fails (but if EDNS0 ever succeeded we never
fall back again, and after a timeout we will retry EDNS0).
Previously, we would only degrade on packet loss, but when adding EDNS0 support,
we also have to handle the case where the server replies with an explicit error.
This is inspired by the logic in BIND [0], follow-up patches
will implement the reset of that scheme.
If we get a server error back, or if after several attempts we don't
get a reply at all, we switch from UDP to TCP for the given
server for the current and all subsequent requests. However, if
we ever successfully received a reply over UDP, we never fall
back to TCP, and once a grace-period has passed, we try to upgrade
again to using UDP. The grace-period starts off at five minutes
after the current feature level was verified and then grows
exponentially to six hours. This is to mitigate problems due
to temporary lack of network connectivity, but at the same time
avoid flooding the network with retries when the feature attempted
feature level genuinely does not work.
Note that UDP is likely much more commonly supported than TCP,
but depending on the path between the client and the server, we
may have more luck with TCP in case something is wrong. We really
do prefer UDP though, as that is much more lightweight, that is
why TCP is only the last resort.
[0]: <https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01219/0/Refinements-to-EDNS-fallback-behavior-can-cause-different-outcomes-in-Recursive-Servers.html>
