IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Some places invoked fflush() directly with their own manual error
checking, let's unify all that by using fflush_and_check().
This also unifies the general error paths of fflush()+rename() file
writers.
This patch fixes the size of networkd
Bug #775
before:
size systemd-networkd
text data bss dec hex filename
1493755 8424392 2337 9920484 975fe4 systemd-networkd
After
$ size systemd-networkd
text data bss dec hex filename
1493555 35752 2337 1531644 175efc systemd-networkd
The gvariant root container contains a 'variant' at the end, which embeds
the whole message body. This variant *must* contain a structure so we are
compatible to dbus1. Otherwise, it could encode at most 1 type, instead
of a full signature.
Our gvariant message parser already parses the variant-content as a
structure, so we're mostly good. However, it does *not* include the
opening and closing parantheses, nor does it parse them.
This patch fixes the decoder to verify a message contains the
parantheses, and also make the encoder add those parantheses into the
marshaled message.
If c->item_size is 0, the next item to parse in a structure is empty.
However, this also implies that the signature must be empty. The latter
case is already handled just fine by enter_struct_or_dict_entry() so
there is no reason to handle the same case in the caller.
Right now sd_bus_message_skip() will abort execution if passed a
signature of the unary type "()". Regardless whether this should be
supported or not, we really must not abort. Drop the incorrect assertion
and add a test-case for this.
We must consider 'pending' links as if they may be managed by networkd, as this
is the state we enter before deciding wether networkd should manage the link
or not, so we better wait for this decision being made.
Let's optimize things a bit and properly compare DNS question arrays,
instead of checking if they are mutual supersets. This also makes ANY
query handling more accurate.
