IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Boot loaders are software like any other, and hence muse be updated in
regular intervals. Let's add a simple (optional) service that updates
sd-boot automatically from the host if it is found installed but
out-of-date in the ESP.
Note that traditional distros probably should invoke "bootctl update"
directly from the package scripts whenver they update the sd-boot
package. This new service is primarily intended for image-based update
systems, i.e. where the rootfs or /usr are atomically updated in A/B
style and where the current boot loader should be synced into the ESP
from the currently booted image every now and then. It can also act as
safety net if the packaging scripts in classic systems are't doing the
bootctl update stuff themselves.
Since updating boot loaders mit be a tiny bit risky (even though we try
really hard to make them robust, by fsck'ing the ESP and mounting it only on
demand, by doing updates mostly as single file updates and by fsync()ing
heavily) this is an optional feature, i.e. subject to "systemctl
enable". However, since it's the right thing to do I think, it's enabled
by default via the preset logic.
Note that the updating logic is implemented gracefully: i.e. it's a NOP
if the boot loader is already new enough, or was never installed.
Previously, the "bootctl update" logic would refrain from downrgading a
boot loader, but if the boot loader that is installed already matched
the version we could install we'd install it anyway, under the
assumption this was effectively without effect. This behaviour was handy
while developing boot loaders, since installing a modified boot loader
didn't require a version bump.
However, outside of the systems of boot loader developers I don't think
this behaviour makes much sense: we should always emphasize doing
minimal changes to the ESP, hence when an update is supposedly not
necessary, then don't do it. Only update if it really makes sense, to
minimize writes to the ESP. Updating the boot loader is a good thing
after all, but doing so redundantly is not.
Also, downgrade the message about this to LOG_NOTICE, given this
shouldn't be a reason to log.
Finally, exit cleanly in this cases (or if another boot loader is
detected)
Before this patch, there was no way to request all running user instances for
reexecuting. However this can be useful especially during package updates
otherwise user instances are never updated and keep running a potentially very
old version of the binaries.
Now assuming that we have enough priviledge, it's possible to request
reexecution of all user instances:
systemctl kill --signal=SIGRTMIN+25 "user@*.service"
Note that this request is obviously asynchronous as it relies on a
signal. Keeping "systemctl kill" as the only interface should be good enough to
make this obvious and that's the reason why another interface, such as
"systemctl --global daemon-reexec" has not been considered.
PID1 already uses SIGTERM for reexecuting hence sending it SIGRTMIN+25 is a
nop.
The text used "unit's view" to mean mount namespace. But we talk about
mount namespaces in the later part of the paragraph anyway, so trying to
use an "approachable term" only makes the whole thing harder to understand.
Let's use the precise term.
Some paragraph-breaking and re-indentation is done too.
The output is similar to our hand-crafted status message, but it's nice to use
the built-in functionality. After all, it was amended during development to
support our use case.
This undoes part of 4c890ad3cc: the
implementations of update-dbus-docs and update-man-rules are moved back to
man/meson.build, and alias_target() is used to keep the visible target names
unchanged.
The rules for man pages are reworked so that it's possible to invoke the
targets even if xstlproc is not available. After all, xsltproc is only needed
for the final formatted output, and not other processing.
As documented in /meson.build where the variable is defined,
meson.build_root() doesn't work as expected with project nesting. I have
no idea why anyone would want to embed systemd in another meson project,
but let's use the variable if we have it.
See: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20191#issuecomment-881982739
In general, we shouldn't blanket move syscalls like this into @default,
given that glibc actually does have fallbacks, afaics. However, as
long as the syscalls are "read-only" and thus benign, I figure it's a
safe thing to do. But we should probably stick to a "if in doubt, don't"
rule, and put these syscalls in @system-service as default, but not into
@default.
I think in the real world @system-service is the sensible group people
should use, and not @default actually.
Ubuntu Bionic 18.04 has 0.45, so it was below the previously required
minimum version already. Focal 20.04 has 0.53.2. Let's require that
and use various features that are available.
Otherwise the build sometimes fails in a racy way:
```
[274/1850] Compiling C object src/cryptsetup/cryptsetup-tokens/libcryptsetup-token-systemd-tpm2_static.a.p/cryptsetup-token-systemd-tpm2.c.o
FAILED: src/cryptsetup/cryptsetup-tokens/libcryptsetup-token-systemd-tpm2_static.a.p/cryptsetup-token-systemd-tpm2.c.o
cc -Isrc/cryptsetup/cryptsetup-tokens/libcryptsetup-token-systemd-tpm2_static.a.p (...) -c ../build/src/cryptsetup/cryptsetup-tokens/cryptsetup-token-systemd-tpm2.c
../build/src/cryptsetup/cryptsetup-tokens/cryptsetup-token-systemd-tpm2.c:12:10: fatal error: version.h: No such file or directory
12 | #include "version.h"
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
```
Follow-up to d1ae38d85a.
There is some inconsistency, partially caused by the awkward naming
of the docs/ pages. But let's be consistent and use the "official" title.
If we ever change plural↔singular, we should use the same form everywhere.
This header provides definitions for NET_NAME_UNKNOWN ånd NET_NAME_ENUM
Fixes build issue found with non-glibc systems
../git/src/network/networkd-link.c:1203:52: error: 'NET_NAME_UNKNOWN' undeclared (first use in this function)
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
From #20300:
> commit 70f32a260b
> Author: Yu Watanabe <watanabe.yu+github@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun May 23 16:59:40 2021 +0900
> udev/net: do not manage loopback interfaces
> There are nothing we can configure in udevd for loopback interfaces;
> no ethertool configs can be applied, MAC address, interface name should
> introduced a regression for 'udevadm test-builtin net_setup_link /sys/class/net/lo/'.
> Prior to this commit this command would exit with 0 whereas after this commit
> it exists with 1. This causes cloud-init on Archlinux to fail as this command
> is run by it and likely also netplan to have networkd rescan and re-apply a
> bunch of things on NICs.
I think it's reasonable to keep returning 0 here: we are intentatinally doing
nothing for the device, and that is not an error, but a (noop) success.
Fixes#20300.
Add support for systemd-tpm2 based LUKS2 device activation
via libcryptsetup plugin. This make the feature (tpm2 sealed
LUKS2 keyslot passphrase) usable from both systemd utilities
and cryptsetup cli.
The feature is configured via -Dlibcryptsetup-plugins combo
with default value set to 'auto'. It get's enabled automatically
when cryptsetup 2.4.0 or later is installed in build system.
This is not called from the systemd.triggers or systemd.macros files. Instead,
it would be called from the scriptlets in systemd rpm package itself, at the
place where we call systemctl daemon-reexec.
See https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20289#issuecomment-885622200 .
This closes an important gap: so far we would reexecute the system manager and
restart system services that were configured to do so, but we wouldn't do the
same for user managers or user services.
The scheme used for user managers is very similar to the system one, except
that there can be multiple user managers running, so we query the system
manager to get a list of them, and then tell each one to do the equivalent
operations: daemon-reload, disable --now, set-property Markers=+needs-restart,
reload-or-restart --marked.
The total time that can be spend on this is bounded: we execute the commands in
parallel over user managers and units, and additionally set SYSTEMD_BUS_TIMEOUT
to a lower value (15 s by default). User managers should not have too many
units running, and they should be able to do all those operations very
quickly (<< 1s). The final restart operation may take longer, but it's done
asynchronously, so we only wait for the queuing to happen.
The advantage of doing this synchronously is that we can wait for each step to
happen, and for example daemon-reloads can finish before we execute the service
restarts, etc. We can also order various steps wrt. to the phases in the rpm
transaction.
When this was initially proposed, we discussed a more relaxed scheme with bus
property notifications. Such an approach would be more complex because a bunch
of infrastructure would have to be added to system manager to propagate
appropriate notifications to the user managers, and then the user managers
would have to wait for them. Instead, now there is no new code in the managers,
all new functionality is contained in src/rpm/. The ability to call 'systemctl
--user user@' makes this approach very easy. Also, it would be very hard to
order the user manager steps and the rpm transaction steps.
Note: 'systemctl --user disable' is only called for a user managers that are
running. I don't see a nice way around this, and it shouldn't matter too much:
we'll just leave a dangling symlink in the case where the user enabled the
service manually.
A follow-up for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792468 and
fa97d2fcf6.
Some rpms install a bunch of units… It seems nicer to invoke them all in
parallel. In particular, timeouts in systemctl also run in parallel, so if
there's some communication mishap, we will wait less.
Instead of embedding the commands to invoke directly in the macros,
let's use a helper script as indirection. This has a couple of advantages:
- the macro language is awkward, we need to suffix most commands by "|| :"
and "\", which is easy to get wrong. In the new scheme, the macro becomes
a single simple command.
- in the script we can use normal syntax highlighting, shellcheck, etc.
- it's also easier to test the invoked commands by invoking the helper
manually.
- most importantly, the logic is contained in the helper, i.e. we can
update systemd rpm and everything uses the new helper. Before, we would
have to rebuild all packages to update the macro definition.
This raises the question whether it makes sense to use the lua scriptlets when
the real work is done in a bash script. I think it's OK: we still have the
efficient lua scripts that do the short scripts, and we use a single shared
implementation in bash to do the more complex stuff.
The meson version is raised to 0.47 because that's needed for install_mode.
We were planning to raise the required version anyway…
