IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We'd skip any whitespace immediately after "=", but then we'd treat whitespace
that is between "|" or "!" and the value as significant. This is rather
confusing, let's ignore it too.
If hibernation is requested but /sys/power/resume and
/sys/power/resume_offset are not configured correctly, systemd-sleep
attempts to calculate swapfile offset using fstat and fiemap.
Btrfs returns virtual device number for stat and a virtual offset
for fiemap which results in incorrect offset calculations. In the
case where offset would be calculated and the user is using Btrfs,
log a debug message and fail to write device and offset values.
Use hibernation configuration as defined in
/sys/power/resume and /sys/power/resume_offset
if present before inspecting /proc/swaps and
attempting to calculate swapfile offset
In this mode we are not supposed to "interact with the environment", so loading
all units and printing warnings about syntax errors and /var/run usage seems
inappropriate.
Originally the description of conditions was brief, so it was acceptable
to put this part at the end. But now we have a myriad conditions, and
this crucial bit of information is easy to miss.
Takes a single /sys/fs/bpf/pinned_prog string as argument, but may be
specified multiple times. An empty assignment resets all previous filters.
Closes https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/10227
I have an .efi image with embedded newlinews. Now I don't even remember if it
was created for testing or by accident, but it doesn't really matter. We should
display such files correctly.
(This isn't a problem with normal BLS entries, because input is split into lines
so newlines are consumed.)
Because it's not a device path and (slightly) bad things happen if it
gets confused with one:
$ udevadm info /sys/
Assertion 'device->devpath[0] == '/'' failed at
../src/libsystemd/sd-device/sd-device.c:958,
function sd_device_get_devpath(). Aborting.
Aborted (core dumped)
# udevadm control --property=HELLO=WORLD
Received udev control message (ENV), unsetting 'HELLO'
# udevadm control --property=HELLO=
Received udev control message (ENV), setting 'HELLO='
Oh no, it's busted. Let's try removing this one little negation real quick
to see if it helps...
# udevadm control --property=HELLO=WORLD
Received udev control message (ENV), setting 'HELLO=WORLD'
# udevadm control --property=HELLO=
Received udev control message (ENV), unsetting 'HELLO'
Feels much better now.
Those messages were quite confusing. In particular "adding address" suggests
that we are assiging a new address to an interface, but in fact we're just
reacting to a notification about an addition. So let's call that "remembering"
and "forgetting". It's not fully gramatically correct, but I think it's much
clearer than "adding"/"removing" in this context.
And "received address without address" is too cryptic, let's say "address
message" to distinguish the message from its content.
Also, make failure to format address non-fatal, and print more details in
various places.
For some reason, systemd-logind is trying to handle idle action in one of my containers:
Jun 07 10:28:08 rawhide systemd-logind[42]: System idle. Taking action.
Jun 07 10:28:08 rawhide systemd-logind[42]: Requested operation not supported, ignoring.
But we didn't log what exactly was being done. Let's put the name of the action in messages.
