2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
/*
* namedev . c
*
* Userspace devfs
*
* Copyright ( C ) 2003 Greg Kroah - Hartman < greg @ kroah . com >
*
*
* This program is free software ; you can redistribute it and / or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
* Free Software Foundation version 2 of the License .
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful , but
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY ; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE . See the GNU
* General Public License for more details .
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
* with this program ; if not , write to the Free Software Foundation , Inc . ,
* 675 Mass Ave , Cambridge , MA 0213 9 , USA .
*
*/
# include <stddef.h>
# include <stdlib.h>
# include <string.h>
# include <stdio.h>
# include <fcntl.h>
# include <ctype.h>
# include <unistd.h>
# include <errno.h>
2004-01-15 09:21:38 +03:00
# include <time.h>
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
# include <sys/wait.h>
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
# include <sys/stat.h>
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
2004-02-24 06:07:25 +03:00
# include "libsysfs/sysfs/libsysfs.h"
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
# include "list.h"
# include "udev.h"
2004-03-23 09:22:20 +03:00
# include "udev_lib.h"
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
# include "udev_version.h"
[PATCH] add udev logging to info log
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:14:16AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:10:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Clay Haapala wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Chris Friesen spake thusly:
> > > >
> > > > Maybe for ones with a matching rule, you could print something like:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Is the act of printing/syslogging a rule in an of itself?
> >
> > No, as currently the only way stuff ends up in the syslog is if
> > DEBUG=true is used on the build line.
> >
> > But it's sounding like we might want to change that... :)
>
> How about this in the syslog after connect/disconnect?
>
> Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: configured rule in '/etc/udev/udev.rules' at line 17 applied, 'video*' becomes 'video/webcam%n'
> Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: creating device node '/udev/video/webcam0'
> Jan 15 05:07:47 pim udev[28015]: removing device node '/udev/video/webcam0'
Here is a slightly better version. I've created a logging.h file and
moved the debug macros from udev.h in there.
If you type:
'make' - you will get a binary that prints one or two lines to syslog
if a device node is created or deleted
'make LOG=false' - you get a binary that prints asolutely nothing
'make DEBUG=true' - the same as today, it will print all debug lines
2004-01-16 08:53:20 +03:00
# include "logging.h"
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
# include "namedev.h"
2003-11-24 07:44:41 +03:00
# include "klibc_fixups.h"
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
static struct sysfs_attribute * find_sysfs_attribute ( struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device , char * attr ) ;
2003-12-03 05:38:30 +03:00
LIST_HEAD ( config_device_list ) ;
2003-12-04 05:33:58 +03:00
LIST_HEAD ( perm_device_list ) ;
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
2004-03-11 09:35:37 +03:00
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
/* compare string with pattern (supports * ? [0-9] [!A-Z]) */
static int strcmp_pattern ( const char * p , const char * s )
2003-11-24 08:14:33 +03:00
{
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
if ( s [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' ) {
while ( p [ 0 ] = = ' * ' )
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
p + + ;
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
return ( p [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) ;
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
}
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
switch ( p [ 0 ] ) {
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
case ' [ ' :
{
int not = 0 ;
p + + ;
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
if ( p [ 0 ] = = ' ! ' ) {
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
not = 1 ;
p + + ;
}
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
while ( ( p [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) & & ( p [ 0 ] ! = ' ] ' ) ) {
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
int match = 0 ;
if ( p [ 1 ] = = ' - ' ) {
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
if ( ( s [ 0 ] > = p [ 0 ] ) & & ( s [ 0 ] < = p [ 2 ] ) )
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
match = 1 ;
p + = 3 ;
} else {
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
match = ( p [ 0 ] = = s [ 0 ] ) ;
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
p + + ;
}
if ( match ^ not ) {
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
while ( ( p [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) & & ( p [ 0 ] ! = ' ] ' ) )
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
p + + ;
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
if ( p [ 0 ] = = ' ] ' )
return strcmp_pattern ( p + 1 , s + 1 ) ;
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
}
}
}
break ;
case ' * ' :
if ( strcmp_pattern ( p , s + 1 ) )
return strcmp_pattern ( p + 1 , s ) ;
return 0 ;
case ' \0 ' :
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
if ( s [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' ) {
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
return 0 ;
}
break ;
default :
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
if ( ( p [ 0 ] = = s [ 0 ] ) | | ( p [ 0 ] = = ' ? ' ) )
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
return strcmp_pattern ( p + 1 , s + 1 ) ;
break ;
}
return 1 ;
2003-11-24 08:14:33 +03:00
}
2003-12-04 05:33:58 +03:00
static struct perm_device * find_perm ( char * name )
{
2004-01-04 19:18:16 +03:00
struct perm_device * perm ;
2003-12-04 05:33:58 +03:00
2004-01-04 19:18:16 +03:00
list_for_each_entry ( perm , & perm_device_list , node ) {
2003-12-04 05:33:58 +03:00
if ( strcmp_pattern ( perm - > name , name ) )
continue ;
return perm ;
}
return NULL ;
}
2004-01-20 06:44:24 +03:00
static mode_t get_default_mode ( void )
2003-07-19 09:48:28 +04:00
{
2003-12-04 04:41:02 +03:00
mode_t mode = 0600 ; /* default to owner rw only */
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
if ( strlen ( default_mode_str ) ! = 0 )
2003-12-04 04:41:02 +03:00
mode = strtol ( default_mode_str , NULL , 8 ) ;
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
2003-12-04 04:41:02 +03:00
return mode ;
2003-07-19 09:48:28 +04:00
}
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
static char * get_default_owner ( void )
2004-01-20 06:42:42 +03:00
{
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
if ( strlen ( default_owner_str ) = = 0 )
2004-02-27 06:37:47 +03:00
strfieldcpy ( default_owner_str , " root " ) ;
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
2004-01-20 06:42:42 +03:00
return default_owner_str ;
}
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
static char * get_default_group ( void )
2004-01-20 06:42:42 +03:00
{
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
if ( strlen ( default_group_str ) = = 0 )
2004-02-27 06:37:47 +03:00
strfieldcpy ( default_group_str , " root " ) ;
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
2004-01-20 06:42:42 +03:00
return default_group_str ;
}
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
/* extract possible {attr} and move str behind it */
static char * get_format_attribute ( char * * str )
{
char * pos ;
char * attr = NULL ;
if ( * str [ 0 ] = = ' { ' ) {
pos = strchr ( * str , ' } ' ) ;
if ( pos = = NULL ) {
dbg ( " missing closing brace for format " ) ;
return NULL ;
}
pos [ 0 ] = ' \0 ' ;
attr = * str + 1 ;
* str = pos + 1 ;
dbg ( " attribute='%s', str='%s' " , attr , * str ) ;
}
return attr ;
}
/* extract possible format length and move str behind it*/
static int get_format_len ( char * * str )
{
int num ;
char * tail ;
if ( isdigit ( * str [ 0 ] ) ) {
num = ( int ) strtoul ( * str , & tail , 10 ) ;
2004-03-02 10:17:59 +03:00
if ( num > 0 ) {
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
* str = tail ;
dbg ( " format length=%i " , num ) ;
return num ;
} else {
dbg ( " format parsing error '%s' " , * str ) ;
}
}
return - 1 ;
}
[PATCH] udev - safer string handling - part two
As promised, here is the next round. We provide in addition to the
already used macros:
strfieldcpy(to, from)
strfieldcat(to, from)
the corresponding friends, if the size of the target is not known and
must be provided by the caller:
strnfieldcpy(to, from, maxsize)
strnfieldcat(to, from, maxsize)
and switch nearly all possibly unsafe users of strcat(), strncat(),
strcpy() and strncpy() to these safer macros.
The last known remaining issue seems the use of sprintf() and
snprintf(). I will take on it later today or tomorrow.
2004-02-27 06:40:22 +03:00
static void apply_format ( struct udevice * udev , char * string , size_t maxsize ,
struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev ,
struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device )
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
{
[PATCH] get part of callout return string
Try this patch if you like, to get special parts of the callout output.
This beast works now:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
The callout returned string is separated by spaces and is
addressed by the "len" value of the 'c' format char.
Since we support symlinks, this my be useful for other uses of callout too.
introduce 'len number' for format chars
the first use is 'c'-the callout return to select a part of the output string like:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
(note: first part is requested by len=1, len=0 will return the whole string)
add a test to udev-test.pl
2003-12-16 09:54:38 +03:00
char temp [ NAME_SIZE ] ;
2004-03-04 11:54:13 +03:00
char temp2 [ NAME_SIZE ] ;
[PATCH] get part of callout return string
Try this patch if you like, to get special parts of the callout output.
This beast works now:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
The callout returned string is separated by spaces and is
addressed by the "len" value of the 'c' format char.
Since we support symlinks, this my be useful for other uses of callout too.
introduce 'len number' for format chars
the first use is 'c'-the callout return to select a part of the output string like:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
(note: first part is requested by len=1, len=0 will return the whole string)
add a test to udev-test.pl
2003-12-16 09:54:38 +03:00
char * tail ;
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
char * pos ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
char * attr ;
2004-02-28 17:53:25 +03:00
int len ;
2004-02-17 12:29:03 +03:00
int i ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
char c ;
[PATCH] better fix for NAME="foo-%c{N}" gets a truncated name
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:56:34PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 03:57:04PM -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> >
> > Here is a patch for some new tests.
>
> Applied, thanks.
Here is a small improvement, which looks much better.
Hey Pat, thanks a lot for finding the recent bug, hope this one will
not break it again :)
2004-03-05 05:55:34 +03:00
char * spos ;
2004-03-11 12:37:18 +03:00
char * rest ;
[PATCH] better fix for NAME="foo-%c{N}" gets a truncated name
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:56:34PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 03:57:04PM -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> >
> > Here is a patch for some new tests.
>
> Applied, thanks.
Here is a small improvement, which looks much better.
Hey Pat, thanks a lot for finding the recent bug, hope this one will
not break it again :)
2004-03-05 05:55:34 +03:00
int slen ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
struct sysfs_attribute * tmpattr ;
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
2004-01-14 05:34:33 +03:00
pos = string ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
while ( 1 ) {
2004-02-27 06:40:40 +03:00
pos = strchr ( string , ' % ' ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
if ( pos ! = NULL ) {
2004-01-14 05:34:33 +03:00
pos [ 0 ] = ' \0 ' ;
[PATCH] get part of callout return string
Try this patch if you like, to get special parts of the callout output.
This beast works now:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
The callout returned string is separated by spaces and is
addressed by the "len" value of the 'c' format char.
Since we support symlinks, this my be useful for other uses of callout too.
introduce 'len number' for format chars
the first use is 'c'-the callout return to select a part of the output string like:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
(note: first part is requested by len=1, len=0 will return the whole string)
add a test to udev-test.pl
2003-12-16 09:54:38 +03:00
tail = pos + 1 ;
2004-02-28 17:53:25 +03:00
len = get_format_len ( & tail ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
c = tail [ 0 ] ;
2004-01-14 05:34:33 +03:00
strfieldcpy ( temp , tail + 1 ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
tail = temp ;
} else {
break ;
}
dbg ( " format=%c, string='%s', tail='%s' " , c , string , tail ) ;
[PATCH] get part of callout return string
Try this patch if you like, to get special parts of the callout output.
This beast works now:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
The callout returned string is separated by spaces and is
addressed by the "len" value of the 'c' format char.
Since we support symlinks, this my be useful for other uses of callout too.
introduce 'len number' for format chars
the first use is 'c'-the callout return to select a part of the output string like:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
(note: first part is requested by len=1, len=0 will return the whole string)
add a test to udev-test.pl
2003-12-16 09:54:38 +03:00
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
attr = get_format_attribute ( & tail ) ;
switch ( c ) {
case ' b ' :
if ( strlen ( udev - > bus_id ) = = 0 )
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
break ;
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , udev - > bus_id , maxsize ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
dbg ( " substitute bus_id '%s' " , udev - > bus_id ) ;
break ;
case ' k ' :
if ( strlen ( udev - > kernel_name ) = = 0 )
2003-12-23 06:13:19 +03:00
break ;
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , udev - > kernel_name , maxsize ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
dbg ( " substitute kernel name '%s' " , udev - > kernel_name ) ;
break ;
case ' n ' :
if ( strlen ( udev - > kernel_number ) = = 0 )
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
break ;
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , udev - > kernel_number , maxsize ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
dbg ( " substitute kernel number '%s' " , udev - > kernel_number ) ;
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
break ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
case ' m ' :
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strintcatmax ( string , udev - > minor , maxsize ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
dbg ( " substitute minor number '%u' " , udev - > minor ) ;
break ;
2004-02-28 12:59:02 +03:00
case ' M ' :
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strintcatmax ( string , udev - > major , maxsize ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
dbg ( " substitute major number '%u' " , udev - > major ) ;
break ;
case ' c ' :
if ( strlen ( udev - > program_result ) = = 0 )
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
break ;
2004-02-17 12:29:03 +03:00
/* get part part of the result string */
2004-02-28 17:53:25 +03:00
i = 0 ;
2004-02-17 12:29:03 +03:00
if ( attr ! = NULL )
2004-03-11 12:37:18 +03:00
i = strtoul ( attr , & rest , 10 ) ;
2004-02-17 12:29:03 +03:00
if ( i > 0 ) {
2004-03-04 05:16:35 +03:00
foreach_strpart ( udev - > program_result , " \n \r " , spos , slen ) {
2004-02-17 12:29:03 +03:00
i - - ;
2004-03-04 05:16:35 +03:00
if ( i = = 0 )
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
break ;
[PATCH] get part of callout return string
Try this patch if you like, to get special parts of the callout output.
This beast works now:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
The callout returned string is separated by spaces and is
addressed by the "len" value of the 'c' format char.
Since we support symlinks, this my be useful for other uses of callout too.
introduce 'len number' for format chars
the first use is 'c'-the callout return to select a part of the output string like:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
(note: first part is requested by len=1, len=0 will return the whole string)
add a test to udev-test.pl
2003-12-16 09:54:38 +03:00
}
2004-03-04 05:16:35 +03:00
if ( i > 0 ) {
dbg ( " requested part of result string not found " ) ;
break ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
}
2004-03-11 12:37:18 +03:00
if ( rest [ 0 ] = = ' + ' )
strfieldcpy ( temp2 , spos ) ;
else
strfieldcpymax ( temp2 , spos , slen + 1 ) ;
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , temp2 , maxsize ) ;
2004-03-04 11:54:13 +03:00
dbg ( " substitute part of result string '%s' " , temp2 ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
} else {
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , udev - > program_result , maxsize ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
dbg ( " substitute result string '%s' " , udev - > program_result ) ;
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
}
break ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
case ' s ' :
if ( attr ! = NULL ) {
tmpattr = find_sysfs_attribute ( class_dev , sysfs_device , attr ) ;
if ( tmpattr = = NULL ) {
dbg ( " sysfa attribute '%s' not found " , attr ) ;
break ;
}
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , tmpattr - > value , maxsize ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
dbg ( " substitute sysfs value '%s' " , tmpattr - > value ) ;
} else {
dbg ( " missing attribute " ) ;
}
break ;
case ' % ' :
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , " % " , maxsize ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
break ;
default :
dbg ( " unknown substitution type '%%%c' " , c ) ;
break ;
}
2004-02-28 17:53:25 +03:00
/* truncate to specified length */
if ( len > 0 )
pos [ len ] = ' \0 ' ;
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , tail , maxsize ) ;
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
}
}
2004-02-13 06:48:07 +03:00
/*
* Note , we can have multiple files for different busses in here due
* to the mess that USB has for its device tree . . .
*/
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
static struct bus_file {
char * bus ;
char * file ;
} bus_files [ ] = {
{ . bus = " scsi " , . file = " vendor " } ,
{ . bus = " usb " , . file = " idVendor " } ,
2004-02-13 06:48:07 +03:00
{ . bus = " usb " , . file = " iInterface " } ,
2004-01-13 10:09:02 +03:00
{ . bus = " usb-serial " , . file = " detach_state " } ,
2003-12-30 12:07:55 +03:00
{ . bus = " ide " , . file = " detach_state " } ,
2003-12-25 09:51:16 +03:00
{ . bus = " pci " , . file = " vendor " } ,
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
{ }
} ;
# define SECONDS_TO_WAIT_FOR_FILE 10
static void wait_for_device_to_initialize ( struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device )
{
/* sleep until we see the file for this specific bus type show up this
* is needed because we can easily out - run the kernel in looking for
* these files before the paticular subsystem has created them in the
* sysfs tree properly .
*
* And people thought that the / sbin / hotplug event system was going to
* be slow , poo on you for arguing that before even testing it . . .
*/
struct bus_file * b = & bus_files [ 0 ] ;
struct sysfs_attribute * tmpattr ;
2004-02-13 06:48:07 +03:00
int found = 0 ;
int loop = SECONDS_TO_WAIT_FOR_FILE ;
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
while ( 1 ) {
2004-02-13 06:48:07 +03:00
if ( b - > bus = = NULL ) {
if ( ! found )
break ;
/* sleep to give the kernel a chance to create the file */
sleep ( 1 ) ;
- - loop ;
if ( loop = = 0 )
break ;
b = & bus_files [ 0 ] ;
}
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
if ( strcmp ( sysfs_device - > bus , b - > bus ) = = 0 ) {
2004-02-13 06:48:07 +03:00
found = 1 ;
dbg ( " looking for file '%s' on bus '%s' " , b - > file , b - > bus ) ;
tmpattr = sysfs_get_device_attr ( sysfs_device , b - > file ) ;
if ( tmpattr ) {
/* found it! */
goto exit ;
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
}
2004-02-13 06:48:07 +03:00
dbg ( " can't find '%s' file " , b - > file ) ;
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
}
2004-02-13 06:48:07 +03:00
+ + b ;
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
}
2004-02-13 06:48:07 +03:00
if ( ! found )
dbg ( " did not find bus type '%s' on list of bus_id_files, "
" contact greg@kroah.com " , sysfs_device - > bus ) ;
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
exit :
return ; /* here to prevent compiler warning... */
}
2003-07-19 16:06:55 +04:00
2004-02-12 10:49:04 +03:00
static void fix_kernel_name ( struct udevice * udev )
{
char * temp = udev - > kernel_name ;
while ( * temp ! = 0x00 ) {
/* Some block devices have a ! in their name,
* we need to change that to / */
if ( * temp = = ' ! ' )
* temp = ' / ' ;
+ + temp ;
}
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
static int execute_program ( char * path , char * value , int len )
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
{
int retval ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
int count ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
int status ;
int fds [ 2 ] ;
pid_t pid ;
2003-12-16 09:38:18 +03:00
char * pos ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
char arg [ PROGRAM_SIZE ] ;
char * argv [ sizeof ( arg ) / 2 ] ;
2003-11-21 17:48:01 +03:00
int i ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
i = 0 ;
if ( strchr ( path , ' ' ) ) {
strfieldcpy ( arg , path ) ;
pos = arg ;
while ( pos ! = NULL ) {
if ( pos [ 0 ] = = ' \' ' ) {
/* don't separate if in apostrophes */
pos + + ;
argv [ i ] = strsep ( & pos , " \' " ) ;
while ( pos [ 0 ] = = ' ' )
pos + + ;
} else {
argv [ i ] = strsep ( & pos , " " ) ;
}
dbg ( " arg[%i] '%s' " , i , argv [ i ] ) ;
i + + ;
}
}
argv [ i ] = NULL ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
retval = pipe ( fds ) ;
if ( retval ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( " pipe failed " ) ;
return - 1 ;
}
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
pid = fork ( ) ;
2004-01-27 11:40:12 +03:00
switch ( pid ) {
case 0 :
[PATCH] namedev.c whitespace + debug text cleanup
here is mainly a whitespace cleanup for namedev.c. I changed the
dbg_parse() output a bit for better readability:
current:
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='00:07.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1' id='00:07.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='00:0b.0'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1' id='00:0b.0'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: device id '2-1.1' becomes 'webcam%n' - owner='', group ='', mode=0
becomes:
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:07.1' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:07.1' in '/2-1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:0b.0' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:0b.0' in '/2-1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '2-1.1' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: found id '2-1.1', 'video0' becomes 'webcam%n' - owner='', group ='', mode=0
2003-11-21 05:37:01 +03:00
/* child */
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
close ( STDOUT_FILENO ) ;
2004-02-27 08:29:49 +03:00
/* dup write side of pipe to STDOUT */
dup ( fds [ 1 ] ) ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
if ( argv [ 0 ] ! = NULL ) {
dbg ( " execute '%s' with given arguments " , argv [ 0 ] ) ;
retval = execv ( argv [ 0 ] , argv ) ;
2003-11-21 17:48:01 +03:00
} else {
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
dbg ( " execute '%s' with main argument " , path ) ;
2004-01-27 11:40:12 +03:00
retval = execv ( path , main_argv ) ;
2003-11-21 17:48:01 +03:00
}
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
2004-02-27 08:29:49 +03:00
info ( FIELD_PROGRAM " execution of '%s' failed " , path ) ;
2004-01-27 11:40:12 +03:00
exit ( 1 ) ;
case - 1 :
dbg ( " fork failed " ) ;
return - 1 ;
default :
[PATCH] namedev.c whitespace + debug text cleanup
here is mainly a whitespace cleanup for namedev.c. I changed the
dbg_parse() output a bit for better readability:
current:
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='00:07.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1' id='00:07.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='00:0b.0'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1' id='00:0b.0'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: device id '2-1.1' becomes 'webcam%n' - owner='', group ='', mode=0
becomes:
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:07.1' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:07.1' in '/2-1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:0b.0' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:0b.0' in '/2-1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '2-1.1' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: found id '2-1.1', 'video0' becomes 'webcam%n' - owner='', group ='', mode=0
2003-11-21 05:37:01 +03:00
/* parent reads from fds[0] */
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
close ( fds [ 1 ] ) ;
retval = 0 ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
i = 0 ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
while ( 1 ) {
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
count = read ( fds [ 0 ] , value + i , len - i - 1 ) ;
if ( count < = 0 )
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
break ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
i + = count ;
if ( i > = len - 1 ) {
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
dbg ( " result len %d too short " , len ) ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
retval = - 1 ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
break ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
}
}
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
if ( count < 0 ) {
dbg ( " read failed with '%s' " , strerror ( errno ) ) ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
retval = - 1 ;
}
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
if ( i > 0 & & value [ i ] = = ' \n ' )
i - - ;
value [ i ] = ' \0 ' ;
dbg ( " result is '%s' " , value ) ;
close ( fds [ 0 ] ) ;
wait ( & status ) ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
if ( ! WIFEXITED ( status ) | | ( WEXITSTATUS ( status ) ! = 0 ) ) {
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
dbg ( " exec program status 0x%x " , status ) ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
retval = - 1 ;
}
}
return retval ;
}
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
static struct sysfs_attribute * find_sysfs_attribute ( struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device , char * attr )
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
{
struct sysfs_attribute * tmpattr = NULL ;
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
char * c ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
dbg ( " look for device attribute '%s' " , attr ) ;
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
/* try to find the attribute in the class device directory */
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
tmpattr = sysfs_get_classdev_attr ( class_dev , attr ) ;
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
if ( tmpattr )
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
goto attr_found ;
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
/* look in the class device directory if present */
if ( sysfs_device ) {
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
tmpattr = sysfs_get_device_attr ( sysfs_device , attr ) ;
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
if ( tmpattr )
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
goto attr_found ;
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
}
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
return NULL ;
attr_found :
c = strchr ( tmpattr - > value , ' \n ' ) ;
if ( c ! = NULL )
c [ 0 ] = ' \0 ' ;
dbg ( " found attribute '%s' " , tmpattr - > path ) ;
return tmpattr ;
}
static int compare_sysfs_attribute ( struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device , struct sysfs_pair * pair )
{
struct sysfs_attribute * tmpattr ;
2004-03-05 05:59:13 +03:00
int i ;
int len ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
if ( ( pair = = NULL ) | | ( pair - > file [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' ) | | ( pair - > value = = ' \0 ' ) )
return - ENODEV ;
tmpattr = find_sysfs_attribute ( class_dev , sysfs_device , pair - > file ) ;
if ( tmpattr = = NULL )
return - ENODEV ;
2004-03-05 05:59:13 +03:00
/* strip trailing whitespace of value, if not asked to match for it */
if ( ! isspace ( pair - > value [ strlen ( pair - > value ) - 1 ] ) ) {
i = len = strlen ( tmpattr - > value ) ;
while ( i > 0 & & isspace ( tmpattr - > value [ i - 1 ] ) )
i - - ;
if ( i < len ) {
tmpattr - > value [ i ] = ' \0 ' ;
dbg ( " remove %i trailing whitespace chars from '%s' " ,
len - i , tmpattr - > value ) ;
}
}
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
dbg ( " compare attribute '%s' value '%s' with '%s' " ,
pair - > file , tmpattr - > value , pair - > value ) ;
if ( strcmp_pattern ( pair - > value , tmpattr - > value ) ! = 0 )
return - ENODEV ;
dbg ( " found matching attribute '%s' with value '%s' " ,
pair - > file , pair - > value ) ;
return 0 ;
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
static int match_sysfs_pairs ( struct config_device * dev , struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device )
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
{
struct sysfs_pair * pair ;
int i ;
2003-11-27 04:45:05 +03:00
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
for ( i = 0 ; i < MAX_SYSFS_PAIRS ; + + i ) {
pair = & dev - > sysfs_pair [ i ] ;
if ( ( pair - > file [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' ) | | ( pair - > value [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' ) )
break ;
if ( compare_sysfs_attribute ( class_dev , sysfs_device , pair ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( " sysfs attribute doesn't match " ) ;
return - ENODEV ;
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
}
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
return 0 ;
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
static int match_id ( struct config_device * dev , struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device )
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
{
char path [ SYSFS_PATH_MAX ] ;
char * temp = NULL ;
2004-01-13 10:22:13 +03:00
/* we have to have a sysfs device for ID to work */
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
if ( ! sysfs_device )
return - ENODEV ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
strfieldcpy ( path , sysfs_device - > path ) ;
temp = strrchr ( path , ' / ' ) ;
2004-02-12 12:25:28 +03:00
temp + + ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
dbg ( " search '%s' in '%s', path='%s' " , dev - > id , temp , path ) ;
2004-02-12 12:25:28 +03:00
if ( strcmp_pattern ( dev - > id , temp ) ! = 0 )
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
return - ENODEV ;
2004-02-12 12:24:54 +03:00
else
return 0 ;
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
static int match_place ( struct config_device * dev , struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device )
2003-11-13 05:08:19 +03:00
{
char path [ SYSFS_PATH_MAX ] ;
int found ;
char * temp = NULL ;
2004-01-13 10:22:13 +03:00
/* we have to have a sysfs device for PLACE to work */
2003-11-13 05:08:19 +03:00
if ( ! sysfs_device )
return - ENODEV ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
found = 0 ;
strfieldcpy ( path , sysfs_device - > path ) ;
temp = strrchr ( path , ' / ' ) ;
dbg ( " search '%s' in '%s', path='%s' " , dev - > place , temp , path ) ;
if ( strstr ( temp , dev - > place ) ! = NULL ) {
found = 1 ;
} else {
* temp = 0x00 ;
2003-11-13 05:08:19 +03:00
temp = strrchr ( path , ' / ' ) ;
2003-12-03 05:38:30 +03:00
dbg ( " search '%s' in '%s', path='%s' " , dev - > place , temp , path ) ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
if ( strstr ( temp , dev - > place ) ! = NULL )
2003-11-13 05:08:19 +03:00
found = 1 ;
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
if ( ! found ) {
dbg ( " place doesn't match " ) ;
return - ENODEV ;
2003-11-12 19:26:08 +03:00
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
return 0 ;
2003-11-19 17:19:06 +03:00
}
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
static struct sysfs_device * get_sysfs_device ( struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev )
2003-07-19 09:48:28 +04:00
{
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device ;
struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev_parent ;
2004-01-15 09:21:38 +03:00
struct timespec tspec ;
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
int loop ;
2003-12-25 06:44:19 +03:00
/* Figure out where the device symlink is at. For char devices this will
* always be in the class_dev - > path . But for block devices , it ' s different .
* The main block device will have the device symlink in it ' s path , but
* all partitions have the symlink in its parent directory .
* But we need to watch out for block devices that do not have parents , yet
* look like a partition ( fd0 , loop0 , etc . ) They all do not have a device
* symlink yet . We do sit and spin on waiting for them right now , we should
* possibly have a whitelist for these devices here . . .
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
*/
2004-01-15 09:21:38 +03:00
class_dev_parent = sysfs_get_classdev_parent ( class_dev ) ;
if ( class_dev_parent )
dbg ( " Really a partition " ) ;
2003-12-23 06:07:08 +03:00
2004-01-15 09:21:38 +03:00
tspec . tv_sec = 0 ;
tspec . tv_nsec = 10000000 ; /* sleep 10 millisec */
loop = 10 ;
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
while ( loop - - ) {
2004-02-18 07:59:26 +03:00
if ( udev_sleep )
nanosleep ( & tspec , NULL ) ;
2004-01-15 09:21:38 +03:00
if ( class_dev_parent )
sysfs_device = sysfs_get_classdev_device ( class_dev_parent ) ;
else
sysfs_device = sysfs_get_classdev_device ( class_dev ) ;
2003-12-25 06:44:19 +03:00
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
if ( sysfs_device ! = NULL )
2004-01-15 09:21:38 +03:00
goto device_found ;
2003-11-13 04:38:14 +03:00
}
[PATCH] add udev logging to info log
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:14:16AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:10:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Clay Haapala wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Chris Friesen spake thusly:
> > > >
> > > > Maybe for ones with a matching rule, you could print something like:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Is the act of printing/syslogging a rule in an of itself?
> >
> > No, as currently the only way stuff ends up in the syslog is if
> > DEBUG=true is used on the build line.
> >
> > But it's sounding like we might want to change that... :)
>
> How about this in the syslog after connect/disconnect?
>
> Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: configured rule in '/etc/udev/udev.rules' at line 17 applied, 'video*' becomes 'video/webcam%n'
> Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: creating device node '/udev/video/webcam0'
> Jan 15 05:07:47 pim udev[28015]: removing device node '/udev/video/webcam0'
Here is a slightly better version. I've created a logging.h file and
moved the debug macros from udev.h in there.
If you type:
'make' - you will get a binary that prints one or two lines to syslog
if a device node is created or deleted
'make LOG=false' - you get a binary that prints asolutely nothing
'make DEBUG=true' - the same as today, it will print all debug lines
2004-01-16 08:53:20 +03:00
dbg ( " timed out waiting for device symlink, continuing on anyway... " ) ;
2004-01-15 09:21:38 +03:00
device_found :
/* We have another issue with just the wait above - the sysfs part of
* the kernel may not be quick enough to have created the link to the
* device under the " bus " subsystem . Due to this , the sysfs_device - > bus
* will not contain the actual bus name : (
*
* Libsysfs now provides a new API sysfs_get_device_bus ( ) , so use it
* if needed
*/
if ( sysfs_device ) {
if ( sysfs_device - > bus [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' )
goto bus_found ;
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
2004-01-15 09:21:38 +03:00
loop = 10 ;
tspec . tv_nsec = 10000000 ;
while ( loop - - ) {
2004-02-18 07:59:26 +03:00
if ( udev_sleep )
nanosleep ( & tspec , NULL ) ;
2004-01-15 09:21:38 +03:00
sysfs_get_device_bus ( sysfs_device ) ;
if ( sysfs_device - > bus [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' )
goto bus_found ;
}
[PATCH] add udev logging to info log
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:14:16AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:10:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Clay Haapala wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Chris Friesen spake thusly:
> > > >
> > > > Maybe for ones with a matching rule, you could print something like:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Is the act of printing/syslogging a rule in an of itself?
> >
> > No, as currently the only way stuff ends up in the syslog is if
> > DEBUG=true is used on the build line.
> >
> > But it's sounding like we might want to change that... :)
>
> How about this in the syslog after connect/disconnect?
>
> Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: configured rule in '/etc/udev/udev.rules' at line 17 applied, 'video*' becomes 'video/webcam%n'
> Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: creating device node '/udev/video/webcam0'
> Jan 15 05:07:47 pim udev[28015]: removing device node '/udev/video/webcam0'
Here is a slightly better version. I've created a logging.h file and
moved the debug macros from udev.h in there.
If you type:
'make' - you will get a binary that prints one or two lines to syslog
if a device node is created or deleted
'make LOG=false' - you get a binary that prints asolutely nothing
'make DEBUG=true' - the same as today, it will print all debug lines
2004-01-16 08:53:20 +03:00
dbg ( " timed out waiting to find the device bus, continuing on anyway " ) ;
2004-01-15 09:21:38 +03:00
goto exit ;
bus_found :
[PATCH] add udev logging to info log
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:14:16AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:10:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Clay Haapala wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Chris Friesen spake thusly:
> > > >
> > > > Maybe for ones with a matching rule, you could print something like:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Is the act of printing/syslogging a rule in an of itself?
> >
> > No, as currently the only way stuff ends up in the syslog is if
> > DEBUG=true is used on the build line.
> >
> > But it's sounding like we might want to change that... :)
>
> How about this in the syslog after connect/disconnect?
>
> Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: configured rule in '/etc/udev/udev.rules' at line 17 applied, 'video*' becomes 'video/webcam%n'
> Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: creating device node '/udev/video/webcam0'
> Jan 15 05:07:47 pim udev[28015]: removing device node '/udev/video/webcam0'
Here is a slightly better version. I've created a logging.h file and
moved the debug macros from udev.h in there.
If you type:
'make' - you will get a binary that prints one or two lines to syslog
if a device node is created or deleted
'make LOG=false' - you get a binary that prints asolutely nothing
'make DEBUG=true' - the same as today, it will print all debug lines
2004-01-16 08:53:20 +03:00
dbg ( " device %s is registered with bus '%s' " ,
2004-01-15 09:21:38 +03:00
sysfs_device - > name , sysfs_device - > bus ) ;
}
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
exit :
return sysfs_device ;
}
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
static int match_rule ( struct config_device * dev , struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct udevice * udev , struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device )
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
{
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
while ( 1 ) {
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
/* check for matching bus value */
if ( dev - > bus [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
if ( sysfs_device = = NULL ) {
dbg ( " device has no bus " ) ;
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
goto try_parent ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
}
dbg ( " check for " FIELD_BUS " dev->bus='%s' sysfs_device->bus='%s' " , dev - > bus , sysfs_device - > bus ) ;
if ( strcmp_pattern ( dev - > bus , sysfs_device - > bus ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_BUS " is not matching " ) ;
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
goto try_parent ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
} else {
dbg ( FIELD_BUS " matches " ) ;
}
}
2003-11-12 19:26:08 +03:00
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
/* check for matching kernel name*/
if ( dev - > kernel [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
dbg ( " check for " FIELD_KERNEL " dev->kernel='%s' class_dev->name='%s' " , dev - > kernel , class_dev - > name ) ;
if ( strcmp_pattern ( dev - > kernel , class_dev - > name ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_KERNEL " is not matching " ) ;
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
goto try_parent ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
} else {
dbg ( FIELD_KERNEL " matches " ) ;
}
}
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
/* check for matching bus id */
if ( dev - > id [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
dbg ( " check " FIELD_ID ) ;
if ( match_id ( dev , class_dev , sysfs_device ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_ID " is not matching " ) ;
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
goto try_parent ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
} else {
dbg ( FIELD_ID " matches " ) ;
}
}
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
/* check for matching place of device */
if ( dev - > place [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
dbg ( " check " FIELD_PLACE ) ;
if ( match_place ( dev , class_dev , sysfs_device ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_PLACE " is not matching " ) ;
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
goto try_parent ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
} else {
dbg ( FIELD_PLACE " matches " ) ;
}
}
2003-11-13 05:08:19 +03:00
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
/* check for matching sysfs pairs */
if ( dev - > sysfs_pair [ 0 ] . file [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
dbg ( " check " FIELD_SYSFS " pairs " ) ;
if ( match_sysfs_pairs ( dev , class_dev , sysfs_device ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_SYSFS " is not matching " ) ;
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
goto try_parent ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
} else {
dbg ( FIELD_SYSFS " matches " ) ;
}
}
/* execute external program */
if ( dev - > program [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
dbg ( " check " FIELD_PROGRAM ) ;
[PATCH] udev - safer string handling - part two
As promised, here is the next round. We provide in addition to the
already used macros:
strfieldcpy(to, from)
strfieldcat(to, from)
the corresponding friends, if the size of the target is not known and
must be provided by the caller:
strnfieldcpy(to, from, maxsize)
strnfieldcat(to, from, maxsize)
and switch nearly all possibly unsafe users of strcat(), strncat(),
strcpy() and strncpy() to these safer macros.
The last known remaining issue seems the use of sprintf() and
snprintf(). I will take on it later today or tomorrow.
2004-02-27 06:40:22 +03:00
apply_format ( udev , dev - > program , sizeof ( dev - > program ) ,
class_dev , sysfs_device ) ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
if ( execute_program ( dev - > program , udev - > program_result , NAME_SIZE ) ! = 0 ) {
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
dbg ( FIELD_PROGRAM " returned nonzero " ) ;
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
goto try_parent ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
} else {
dbg ( FIELD_PROGRAM " returned successful " ) ;
}
}
/* check for matching result of external program */
if ( dev - > result [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
dbg ( " check for " FIELD_RESULT
" dev->result='%s', udev->program_result='%s' " ,
dev - > result , udev - > program_result ) ;
if ( strcmp_pattern ( dev - > result , udev - > program_result ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_RESULT " is not matching " ) ;
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
goto try_parent ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
} else {
dbg ( FIELD_RESULT " matches " ) ;
}
}
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
/* Yeah, we matched! */
return 0 ;
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
try_parent :
dbg ( " try parent sysfs device " ) ;
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
sysfs_device = sysfs_get_device_parent ( sysfs_device ) ;
if ( sysfs_device = = NULL )
return - ENODEV ;
dbg ( " sysfs_device->path='%s' " , sysfs_device - > path ) ;
dbg ( " sysfs_device->bus_id='%s' " , sysfs_device - > bus_id ) ;
dbg ( " sysfs_device->bus='%s' " , sysfs_device - > bus ) ;
}
}
int namedev_name_device ( struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct udevice * udev )
{
struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device = NULL ;
struct config_device * dev ;
struct perm_device * perm ;
char * pos ;
udev - > mode = 0 ;
/* find the sysfs_device associated with this class device */
sysfs_device = get_sysfs_device ( class_dev ) ;
if ( sysfs_device ) {
dbg ( " sysfs_device->path='%s' " , sysfs_device - > path ) ;
dbg ( " sysfs_device->bus_id='%s' " , sysfs_device - > bus_id ) ;
dbg ( " sysfs_device->bus='%s' " , sysfs_device - > bus ) ;
strfieldcpy ( udev - > bus_id , sysfs_device - > bus_id ) ;
wait_for_device_to_initialize ( sysfs_device ) ;
}
2004-02-12 10:49:04 +03:00
dbg ( " class_dev->name = '%s' " , class_dev - > name ) ;
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
strfieldcpy ( udev - > kernel_name , class_dev - > name ) ;
2004-02-12 10:49:04 +03:00
fix_kernel_name ( udev ) ;
dbg ( " udev->kernel_name = '%s' " , udev - > kernel_name ) ;
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
/* get kernel number */
pos = class_dev - > name + strlen ( class_dev - > name ) ;
while ( isdigit ( * ( pos - 1 ) ) )
pos - - ;
strfieldcpy ( udev - > kernel_number , pos ) ;
dbg ( " kernel_number='%s' " , udev - > kernel_number ) ;
/* look for a matching rule to apply */
list_for_each_entry ( dev , & config_device_list , node ) {
dbg ( " process rule " ) ;
if ( match_rule ( dev , class_dev , udev , sysfs_device ) = = 0 ) {
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
if ( dev - > name [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' & & dev - > symlink [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' ) {
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
info ( " configured rule in '%s' at line %i applied, '%s' is ignored " ,
2004-03-02 09:28:51 +03:00
dev - > config_file , dev - > config_line , udev - > kernel_name ) ;
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
return - 1 ;
}
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
if ( dev - > symlink [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
info ( " configured rule in '%s' at line %i applied, added symlink '%s' " ,
2004-03-02 09:28:51 +03:00
dev - > config_file , dev - > config_line , dev - > symlink ) ;
2004-03-11 12:39:53 +03:00
if ( udev - > symlink [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' )
strfieldcat ( udev - > symlink , " " ) ;
strfieldcat ( udev - > symlink , dev - > symlink ) ;
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
}
if ( dev - > name [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
info ( " configured rule in '%s' at line %i applied, '%s' becomes '%s' " ,
2004-03-02 09:28:51 +03:00
dev - > config_file , dev - > config_line , udev - > kernel_name , dev - > name ) ;
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
strfieldcpy ( udev - > name , dev - > name ) ;
goto found ;
}
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
}
2003-11-12 19:26:08 +03:00
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
/* no rule was found so we use the kernel name */
2004-02-17 05:19:48 +03:00
strfieldcpy ( udev - > name , udev - > kernel_name ) ;
2003-11-19 17:19:06 +03:00
goto done ;
2003-10-20 08:56:21 +04:00
2003-11-19 17:19:06 +03:00
found :
2004-03-11 12:39:53 +03:00
apply_format ( udev , udev - > name , sizeof ( udev - > name ) , class_dev , sysfs_device ) ;
apply_format ( udev , udev - > symlink , sizeof ( udev - > symlink ) , class_dev , sysfs_device ) ;
2004-02-17 08:44:28 +03:00
udev - > partitions = dev - > partitions ;
[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
strfieldcpy ( udev - > config_file , dev - > config_file ) ;
udev - > config_line = dev - > config_line ;
2004-03-11 09:35:37 +03:00
2003-11-19 17:19:06 +03:00
done :
2004-03-11 09:35:37 +03:00
/* get permissions given in rule */
set_empty_perms ( udev , dev - > mode ,
dev - > owner ,
dev - > group ) ;
/* get permissions given in config file or set defaults */
2003-12-04 05:33:58 +03:00
perm = find_perm ( udev - > name ) ;
2004-03-11 09:35:37 +03:00
if ( perm ! = NULL ) {
set_empty_perms ( udev , perm - > mode ,
perm - > owner ,
perm - > group ) ;
2003-12-04 05:33:58 +03:00
} else {
2004-03-11 09:35:37 +03:00
set_empty_perms ( udev , get_default_mode ( ) ,
get_default_owner ( ) ,
get_default_group ( ) ) ;
2003-07-25 15:01:48 +04:00
}
2004-03-11 09:35:37 +03:00
2003-12-04 05:33:58 +03:00
dbg ( " name, '%s' is going to have owner='%s', group='%s', mode = %#o " ,
udev - > name , udev - > owner , udev - > group , udev - > mode ) ;
2003-11-13 04:38:14 +03:00
[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
/* store time of action */
udev - > config_time = time ( NULL ) ;
2003-11-12 19:26:08 +03:00
return 0 ;
2003-07-19 09:48:28 +04:00
}
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
int namedev_init ( void )
{
int retval ;
2003-12-05 06:21:27 +03:00
2003-12-03 12:08:46 +03:00
retval = namedev_init_rules ( ) ;
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
if ( retval )
return retval ;
retval = namedev_init_permissions ( ) ;
if ( retval )
return retval ;
2003-12-03 05:38:30 +03:00
dump_config_dev_list ( ) ;
2003-12-04 05:33:58 +03:00
dump_perm_dev_list ( ) ;
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
return retval ;
}