IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
specialix_rioctl: no kernel name symlink
specialix_sxctl: no kernel name symlink
bus/usb: 0644 -> 0664
ppdev: lp
dri: 0666 -> 0660
js: no kernel name symlink
In the interest of standardizing udev rules, please consider the
following patch that adds udev rules for the ATA over Ethernet character
and block devices. The aoe module has been a long-time member of the
kernel and needs inclusion in the standard udev rules.
[...] running the command
`make maintainer-clean' should not delete `configure' even if
`configure' can be remade using a rule in the Makefile. More
generally, `make maintainer-clean' should not delete anything that
needs to exist in order to run `configure' and then begin to build
the program. This is the only exception; `maintainer-clean' should
delete everything else that can be rebuilt.
* fix typo (hs vs. hbb)
* set id->{version,usage,type} when all tests pass
* be paranoid and don't use hs->version when "hs" source buffer was
possibly modified by next volume_id_get_buffer() call.
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 21:07, Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@gentoo.org> wrote:
> It seems that the rules related to capi devices are not correct:
>
> KERNEL=="capi", NAME="capi20", SYMLINK+="isdn/capi20"
> KERNEL=="capi*", NAME="capi/%n"
>
> Changing the second rule to match only on KERNEL=="capi[0-9]*" is reported to
> make it work.
> So I can only guess that the problem is the second rule overwriting the NAME
> set by the first one.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 14:17, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> wrote:
> I see the patch (volume_id_probe_filesystem()) and a few things come
> to mind:
>
> - shouldn't be the relevant parts (label, uuid, version, ...) of
> the "struct volume_id" zeroized when you found a signature and
> before you call the next probing function?
>
> - it seems as overkill to use two for()s and probe two times for all
> filesystems. What about to store the first result and re-use it?
>
> - .. or at least never use the second for() when the fist for() found
> nothing ;-)
