IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
While it doesn't really make much sense to set "auto-reboot-to-firmware"
as oneshot boot item, let's still support it properly, by also
dispatching such a menu item if selected.
Let's stick to one nomenclature. In userspace we usually call this
"reboot to firmware setup", hence use the same name in sd-boot too.
This name was previously only relevant internally, but since the
addition of the LoaderEntries EFI var is exposed to userspace, hence
let's get this right with the first release adding this.
We keep adding new features, let's advertise to the host OS what these
are in a new variable LoaderFeatures.
It works a bit like OsIndicationsSupported, but is about Loader
features.
The three core variables that affect idleness handling are whether we
are docked, whether we are on AC power and whether the lid is closed,
hence let's also expose the third variable on the bus, to make things
nicely debuggable.
It's not, after all, that's what SetRebootToFirmware() is about.
(I was wondering for a moment whether to make this EMITS_CHANGES, but
decided against it, given that the flag actually can be changed
externally to logind too, and we couldn't send out notifications for
that.)
Ideally we'd even propagate this all the way to the client, by having a
separate JobType enum value for this. But it's hard to add this without
breaking compat, hence for now let's at least internally propagate this
case differently from the case "already on it".
This is then used to call job_finish_and_invalidate() slightly
differently, with the already= parameter false, as in the failed
condition case no message was likely produced so far.
The message SD_MESSAGE_UNIT_FAILED is closely related to
SD_MESSAGE_UNIT_STARTED as it is generated when a start job failed
instead of completed successfully, Hence they should be placed together.
Otherwise one might get the impression that the message was about
failing units, which it really is not.
These texts have been slightly misleading previously, as they talked
about units, not jobs, but are actually generated for jobs, not units.
This difference matters as units can change state without a job
requesting that.
Also, the message be02cf6855d2428ba40df7e9d022f03d was particularly
wrong, as it claimed the unit failed, while it actually is the start job
that failed, which is a major difference, as jobs can fail without the
unit actually being placed in a failed state. Let's move this message a
bit up, closed to 39f53479d3a045ac8e11786248231fbf (i.e. the message
seen when a start job finished successfully).
This call is only used by job.c and very specific to job handling.
Moreover the very similar logic of job_emit_status_message() is already
in job.c.
Hence, let's clean this up, and move both sets of functions to job.c,
and rename them a bit so that they express precisely what they do:
1. unit_status_emit_starting_stopping_reloading() →
job_emit_begin_status_message()
2. job_emit_status_message() → job_emit_done_status_message()
The first call is after all what we call when we begin with the
execution of a job, and the second call what we call when we are done
wiht it.
Just some moving and renaming, not other changes, and hence no change in
behaviour.
