IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
lstat() returns the error in errno, not as return value. Let's propagate
this correctly.
This broke the bolt test suite, as @gicmo discovered.
Follow-up for acfc2a1d15.
Let's define both an enum and a typedef named SpecialGlyph, the way we
usually do it.
Also, introduce an "invalid" special glyph, assigned to -EINVAL, also
like we always do it. (And handle it somewhat sanely in special_glyph()
'! grep -v' does *not* test that there are no matching lines.
Instead, it checks that whether there are any non-matching lines.
And of course, for the test to fail, '! grep' cannot be part of
an expression with &&.
We were grepping for 'hello world', and in the namespace we would
match on 'hello world', and outside, on 'echo "hello world"'. When
the condition check was fixed, the test gave a false positive.
We were invoking 'systemd-run bash', but the test invoked by bash
was not effective. When the result of that check is propagated, the
outer command fails.
create_fifo() was added in a2fc2f8dd3, and
would always ignore failure. The test was trying to fail in this case, but
we actually don't fail, which seems to be correct. We didn't notice before
because the test was ineffective.
To make things consistent, generally log at warning level, but don't propagate
the error. For symlinks, log at debug level, as before.
For 'e', failure is not propagated now. The test is adjusted to match.
I think warning is appropriate in most cases: we do not expect a device node to
be replaced by a different device node or even a non-device file. This would
most likely be an error somewhere. An exception is made for symlinks, which are
mismatched on purpose, for example /etc/resolv.conf. With this patch, we don't
get any warnings with the any of the 74 tmpfiles.d files, which suggests that
increasing the warning levels will not cause too many unexpected warnings. If
it turns out that there are valid cases where people have expected mismatches
for non-symlink types, we can always decrease the log levels again.
Quoting of values differs between distros: Fedora doesn't quote the ID_
fields, but CentOS does.
Adjust the test checks to account for this.
Fixes#19242
Also add "system" in the messages, because we set the internal value,
and are just skipping the setting of the external value, so the message
could be confusing without that clarification.
We didn't document this behaviour one way or another, so I think it's
OK to change. All callers do the NULL check before callling this to avoid
the assert warning, so it seems reasonable to do it internally.
sd_bus_can_send() is similar, but there we expressly say that an
error is returned on NULL, so I didn't change it.
Also use standard error loggin/return pattern.
Only cursory tested, by checking that with a simple config file
the array is the same before/after. Not tested with actual scsi
rules and devices, due to missing hardware.
Some static analyzers (lgtm) warn against using non-re-entrant functions,
even though at the moment this code is not multi-threaded, just switch to
format_timestamp.
The warning was disabled in 8794164fed to avoid
false positives. But it is useful in finding errors, even if it sometimes
results in untrue warnings (c.f. 77fac974fe, da46a1bc3c).
After #19168, #19169, and #19175, there are no warnings with
-Dbuildtype=debug-optimized/-O2 and gcc-11.0.1-0.3.fc34.x86_64. Warnings
are reenabled for -O[23]
-O0 is good for development, and -O2 is the default optimization level for
Fedora package builds. -Os, -O3, -O1, and -Og still generate some warnings. In
fact, with -Os the number of warnings seems completely hopeless. Dozens and
dozens.
gcc-11.0.1-0.3.fc34.x86_64 with -Og was complaining that 'r' might be
unitialized. It cannot, but let's rework the code to use a goto instead of
conditionalizing on 'call' being unset, which I think is clearer and less error
prone. This silences the warning.
gcc-11.0.1-0.3.fc34.x86_64 was complaining that n might be unset with
--optimization=1. It was wrong, but let's rework the code to make it
obvious that it is always set.
