IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
When `linux-headers` is installed on Arch Linux, it stores the module
source tree in the kernel module directory, which is then picked up by
`find` and we get a lot of harmless but annoying errors:
```
...
modprobe: FATAL: Module Kconfig.iosched not found in directory /lib/modules/5.13.7-arch1-1
modprobe: FATAL: Module Kconfig not found in directory /lib/modules/5.13.7-arch1-1
modprobe: FATAL: Module Kconfig not found in directory /lib/modules/5.13.7-arch1-1
modprobe: FATAL: Module dm-mpath.h not found in directory /lib/modules/5.13.7-arch1-1
modprobe: FATAL: Module dm-bio-prison-v2.h not found in directory /lib/modules/5.13.7-arch1-1
modprobe: FATAL: Module raid0.h not found in directory /lib/modules/5.13.7-arch1-1
...
```
Let's fix this by trying to install only kernel modules (*.ko files with
an optional compression).
We would update 'found' using bit operations, but studiously ignore the actual
value and treat it as boolean. So just use a boolean variable instead. Because
there is a double loop, we would break the inner loop, but repeat the outer
loop, even though the boolean was already set. Add '&& !found' in the loop
conditions to break iteration immediately.
We had 'msghdr' and 'mh' in various places. Now 'const struct msghdr msghdr' is
used consistently. With structured init the variable is only used in the call
to sendmsg(), so let's make it a bit more descriptive.
Normally, these services are killed because we run isolate. But I booted into
emergency mode (because of a futher bug with us timing out improperly on the
luks password prompt), and then continuted to the host system by running
'systemctl start systemd-switch-root.service'. My error, but the results are
confusing and bad: systemd in the host sees 'systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service'
as started successfully, and doesn't restart it, so the setup for /tmp/.X11 is
not done and gdm.service fails. So while we wouldn't encounter this during
normal successful boot, I think it's good to make this more robust.
The dep is added to systemd-tmpfiles-{setup,clean}, because /tmp is not
propagated over switch-root. /dev is, so I didn't touch
systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.service.
The current pattern '#' triggers on the openSUSE kernel version that is
printed early during boot when no actual prompt is ready
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.12.10-1-default (geeko@buildhost) (gcc (SUSE Linux) 11.1.1 20210510 [revision 23855a176609fe8dda6abaf2b21846b4517966eb], GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Tumbleweed) 2.36.1.20210326-4) #1 SMP Fri Jun 11 05:05:06 UTC 2021 (b92eaf7)
Instead wait for pattern that: a) should have fewer false positives, b)
still be with working on distro shells:
openSUSE (red color)
^[[1m^[[31mimage:~ #^[[m^O
arch
[root@image ~]#
debian
root@image:~#
ubuntu
root@image:~#
fedora
[root@image ~]#
The current boot test relies on terminal login, therefore network setup
inside image is unnecessary. This opens up possibility to test images
that don't support the network setup via veth devices.
These have ignored the return value forever. Two are public APIs so
we can't really change what they return anyway, and the other one is
a cleanup path and the existing error code is more important.
CID#1461274
CID#1461275
CID#1461276
In general we almost never hit those asserts in production code, so users see
them very rarely, if ever. But either way, we just need something that users
can pass to the developers.
We have quite a few of those asserts, and some have fairly nice messages, but
many are like "WTF?" or "???" or "unexpected something". The error that is
printed includes the file location, and function name. In almost all functions
there's at most one assert, so the function name alone is enough to identify
the failure for a developer. So we don't get much extra from the message, and
we might just as well drop them.
Dropping them makes our code a tiny bit smaller, and most importantly, improves
development experience by making it easy to insert such an assert in the code
without thinking how to phrase the argument.
