IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The message SD_MESSAGE_UNIT_FAILED is closely related to
SD_MESSAGE_UNIT_STARTED as it is generated when a start job failed
instead of completed successfully, Hence they should be placed together.
Otherwise one might get the impression that the message was about
failing units, which it really is not.
These texts have been slightly misleading previously, as they talked
about units, not jobs, but are actually generated for jobs, not units.
This difference matters as units can change state without a job
requesting that.
Also, the message be02cf6855d2428ba40df7e9d022f03d was particularly
wrong, as it claimed the unit failed, while it actually is the start job
that failed, which is a major difference, as jobs can fail without the
unit actually being placed in a failed state. Let's move this message a
bit up, closed to 39f53479d3a045ac8e11786248231fbf (i.e. the message
seen when a start job finished successfully).
This call is only used by job.c and very specific to job handling.
Moreover the very similar logic of job_emit_status_message() is already
in job.c.
Hence, let's clean this up, and move both sets of functions to job.c,
and rename them a bit so that they express precisely what they do:
1. unit_status_emit_starting_stopping_reloading() →
job_emit_begin_status_message()
2. job_emit_status_message() → job_emit_done_status_message()
The first call is after all what we call when we begin with the
execution of a job, and the second call what we call when we are done
wiht it.
Just some moving and renaming, not other changes, and hence no change in
behaviour.
This should help to catch issues that are easily detectable by
bad_build_check like the one being fixed in https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/10793,
which would totally break the build tomorrow if I hadn't run
`helper.py check_build` manually.
asan doesn't like it if we use strndup() (i.e. a string function) on a
non-NULL terminated buffer (i.e. something that isn't really a string).
Let's hence use memdup_suffix0() instead of strndup(), which is more
appropriate for binary data that is to become a string.
Fixes: #10385
This is a follow-up to 8857fb9beb that prevents the fuzzer from crashing with
```
==220==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: ABRT on unknown address 0x0000000000dc (pc 0x7ff4953c8428 bp 0x7ffcf66ec290 sp 0x7ffcf66ec128 T0)
SCARINESS: 10 (signal)
#0 0x7ff4953c8427 in gsignal (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x35427)
#1 0x7ff4953ca029 in abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x37029)
#2 0x7ff49666503a in log_assert_failed_realm /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/basic/log.c:805:9
#3 0x7ff496614ecf in safe_close /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/basic/fd-util.c:66:17
#4 0x548806 in server_done /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/journal/journald-server.c:2064:9
#5 0x5349fa in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/fuzz/fuzz-journald-kmsg.c:26:9
#6 0x592755 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ExecuteCallback(unsigned char const*, unsigned long) /src/libfuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:571:15
#7 0x590627 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::RunOne(unsigned char const*, unsigned long, bool, fuzzer::InputInfo*, bool*) /src/libfuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:480:3
#8 0x594432 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::MutateAndTestOne() /src/libfuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:708:19
#9 0x5973c6 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::Loop(std::__1::vector<std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> >, fuzzer::fuzzer_allocator<std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > > > const&) /src/libfuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:839:5
#10 0x574541 in fuzzer::FuzzerDriver(int*, char***, int (*)(unsigned char const*, unsigned long)) /src/libfuzzer/FuzzerDriver.cpp:764:6
#11 0x5675fc in main /src/libfuzzer/FuzzerMain.cpp:20:10
#12 0x7ff4953b382f in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2082f)
#13 0x420f58 in _start (/out/fuzz-journald-kmsg+0x420f58)
```
The function takes a pointer to a random block of memory and
the length of that block. It shouldn't crash every time it sees
a zero byte at the beginning there.
This should help the dev-kmsg fuzzer to keep going.
With gcc-7.1.1-3.fc26.aarch64:
../src/basic/json.c: In function ‘json_format’:
../src/basic/json.c:1409:40: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Wtype-limits]
if (*q >= 0 && *q < ' ')
^~
../src/basic/json.c: In function ‘inc_lines_columns’:
../src/basic/json.c:1762:31: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Wtype-limits]
} else if (*s >= 0 && *s < 127) /* Process ASCII chars quickly */
^~
Cast to (signed char) silences the warning, but a cast to (int) for some reason
doesn't.
Now that we don't (mis-)use the env file parser to parse kernel command
lines there's no need anymore to override the used newline character
set. Let's hence drop the argument and just "\n\r" always. This nicely
simplifies our code.
