mirror of
https://github.com/systemd/systemd.git
synced 2024-12-23 21:35:11 +03:00
119 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown
119 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: Desktop Environment Integration
|
|
category: Concepts
|
|
layout: default
|
|
SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Desktop Environments
|
|
|
|
NOTE: This document is a work-in-progress.
|
|
|
|
## Single Graphical Session
|
|
|
|
systemd only supports running one graphical session per user at a time.
|
|
While this might not have always been the case historically, having multiple
|
|
sessions for one user running at the same time is problematic.
|
|
The DBus session bus is shared between all the logins, and services that are
|
|
started must be implicitly assigned to the user's current graphical session.
|
|
|
|
In principle it is possible to run a single graphical session across multiple
|
|
logind seats, and this could be a way to use more than one display per user.
|
|
When a user logs in to a second seat, the seat resources could be assigned
|
|
to the existing session, allowing the graphical environment to present it
|
|
is a single seat.
|
|
Currently nothing like this is supported or even planned.
|
|
|
|
## Pre-defined systemd units
|
|
|
|
[`systemd.special(7)`](https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.special.html)
|
|
defines the `graphical-session.target` and `graphical-session-pre.target` to
|
|
allow cross-desktop integration. Furthermore, systemd defines the three base
|
|
slices `background`, `app` and `session`.
|
|
All units should be placed into one of these slices depending on their purposes:
|
|
|
|
* `session.slice`: Contains only processes essential to run the user's graphical session
|
|
* `app.slice`: Contains all normal applications that the user is running
|
|
* `background.slice`: Useful for low-priority background tasks
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this grouping is to assign different priorities to the
|
|
applications.
|
|
This could e.g. mean reserving memory to session processes,
|
|
preferentially killing background tasks in out-of-memory situations
|
|
or assigning different memory/CPU/IO priorities to ensure that the session
|
|
runs smoothly under load.
|
|
|
|
TODO: Will there be a default to place units into e.g. `app.slice` by default
|
|
rather than the root slice?
|
|
|
|
## XDG standardization for applications
|
|
|
|
To ensure cross-desktop compatibility and encourage sharing of good practices,
|
|
desktop environments should adhere to the following conventions:
|
|
|
|
* Application units should follow the scheme `app[-<launcher>]-<ApplicationID>[@<RANDOM>].service`
|
|
or `app[-<launcher>]-<ApplicationID>-<RANDOM>.scope`
|
|
e.g:
|
|
- `app-gnome-org.gnome.Evince@12345.service`
|
|
- `app-flatpak-org.telegram.desktop@12345.service`
|
|
- `app-KDE-org.kde.okular@12345.service`
|
|
- `app-org.kde.amarok.service`
|
|
- `app-org.gnome.Evince-12345.scope`
|
|
* Using `.service` units instead of `.scope` units, i.e. allowing systemd to
|
|
start the process on behalf of the caller,
|
|
instead of the caller starting the process and letting systemd know about it,
|
|
is encouraged.
|
|
* The RANDOM should be a string of random characters to ensure that multiple instances
|
|
of the application can be launched.
|
|
It can be omitted in the case of a non-transient application services which can ensure
|
|
multiple instances are not spawned, such as a DBus activated application.
|
|
* If no application ID is available, the launcher should generate a reasonable
|
|
name when possible (e.g. using `basename(argv[0])`). This name must not
|
|
contain a `-` character.
|
|
|
|
This has the following advantages:
|
|
* Using the `app-<launcher>-` prefix means that the unit defaults can be
|
|
adjusted using desktop environment specific drop-in files.
|
|
* The application ID can be retrieved by stripping the prefix and postfix.
|
|
This in turn should map to the corresponding `.desktop` file when available
|
|
|
|
TODO: Define the name of slices that should be used.
|
|
This could be `app-<launcher>-<ApplicationID>-<RANDOM>.slice`.
|
|
|
|
TODO: Does it really make sense to insert the `<launcher>`? In GNOME I am
|
|
currently using a drop-in to configure `BindTo=graphical-session.target`,
|
|
`CollectMode=inactive-or-failed` and `TimeoutSec=5s`. I feel that such a
|
|
policy makes sense, but it may make much more sense to just define a
|
|
global default for all (graphical) applications.
|
|
|
|
* Should application lifetime be bound to the session?
|
|
* May the user have applications that do not belong to the graphical session (e.g. launched from SSH)?
|
|
* Could we maybe add a default `app-.service.d` drop-in configuration?
|
|
|
|
## XDG autostart integration
|
|
|
|
To allow XDG autostart integration, systemd ships a cross-desktop generator
|
|
to create appropriate units for the autostart directory
|
|
(`systemd-xdg-autostart-generator`).
|
|
Desktop Environments can opt-in to using this by starting
|
|
`xdg-desktop-autostart.target`. The systemd generator correctly handles
|
|
`OnlyShowIn=` and `NotShowIn=`. It also handles the KDE and GNOME specific
|
|
`X-KDE-autostart-condition=` and `AutostartCondition=` by using desktop-environment-provided
|
|
binaries in an `ExecCondition=` line.
|
|
|
|
However, this generator is somewhat limited in what it supports. For example,
|
|
all generated units will have `After=graphical-session.target` set on them,
|
|
and therefore may not be useful to start session services.
|
|
|
|
Desktop files can be marked to be explicitly excluded from the generator using the line
|
|
`X-systemd-skip=true`. This should be set if an application provides its own
|
|
systemd service file for startup.
|
|
|
|
## Startup and shutdown best practices
|
|
|
|
Question here are:
|
|
|
|
* Are there strong opinions on how the session-leader process should watch the user's session units?
|
|
* Should systemd/logind/… provide an integrated way to define a session in terms of a running *user* unit?
|
|
* Is having `gnome-session-shutdown.target` that is run with `replace-irreversibly` considered a good practice?
|