IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This shows that the internal server can use the dns-SERVER account.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We do this by having the samba-tool domain dcpromo for promoted_vampire_dc also create a
dns-SERVER account.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This avoids asking for attributes that will not be used, and looks only for the
expected exceptions, rather than all exceptions.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This will ensure that the DLZ plugin works out of the box when joining a second Samba DC to the
domain.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 4 01:19:05 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
Leave dsgetdcname_internal() only using const char *site_name.
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 3 19:13:14 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
The comment for this routine said:
> Modifies d->num_share_modes, watch out in routines iterating over
> that array.
Well, it turns out that *every* caller of this API got it wrong. So I
think it's better to change the routine.
This leaves the array untouched while iterating but filters out the
deleted ones while saving them back to disk.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjoern Jacke <bj@sernet.de>
Autobuild-User(master): Björn Jacke <bj@sernet.de>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Aug 30 17:33:58 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
The vfs_gluster_open() function generates a debug message (at level 0)
for every failed attempt to open a pathname. This includes cases in
which attempts are made to open a directory as a file (those attempts
are retried calling vfs_gluster_opendir()). The result is that the log
file fills with messages about failed attempts to open directories, just
because they are directories.
This latest version, of the patch completely removes logging from the
vfs_gluster_open() function. The error code returned is handled in
upper layers, and the open function in the default VFS module does not
log any errors.
Signed-off-by: Christopher R. Hertel <crh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: susant palai <spalai@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: raghavendra talur <rtalur@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jose A. Rivera <jarrpa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Aug 30 02:43:48 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
This prevents segfaults when e.g. a previous SMB_STRDUP failed..
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 29 18:54:28 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
Otherwise there is a good chance the domain has not been connected and we don't
know the realm name yet.
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
We already chown the dns.keytab file, so remove the suggestion to do that,
and instead explain why we can not use chroot (an often-requested feature).
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Björn Jacke <bj@sernet.de>
Autobuild-User(master): Björn Jacke <bj@sernet.de>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 29 13:53:25 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
Fix bug #10001 - Man page for samba-regedit tool missing.
Signed-off-by: Karolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Björn Jacke <bj@sernet.de>
Autobuild-User(master): Björn Jacke <bj@sernet.de>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 29 03:15:51 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
Make sure we get the smb2 infolevel fixed portions right
I could not find correct #defines for the infolevels
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 29 01:27:11 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
This is required if the client offered less buffer than the fixed portion
of the info level data requires
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The stream_info marshalling follows its own rules. This needs unifying
eventually...
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This was too broad and has been replaced by finer-grained error checks
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We have to return this error if the client offered less than the fixed
portion of the infolevel data requires
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The error message will have to change depending whether the buffer is
too small for the fixed or variable buffers
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The error message will have to change depending whether the buffer is
too small for the fixed or variable buffers
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Simo Sorce <idra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Aug 28 20:25:56 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
bin/smbtorture //127.0.0.1 local.talloc now runs with no valgrind errors.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: "Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Aug 28 02:44:17 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
Replace the last use of talloc_memlimit_update() with talloc_memlimit_grow()/
talloc_memlimit_shrink().
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Simo Sorce <idra@samba.org>
Don't check the memlimit if the allocation was successful from a pool. We already
checked the memory limit when we created the pool.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Simo Sorce <idra@samba.org>