IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
tested it, but I can not reproduce the problem I had with abartlett's initial
implementation anymore.
Fix a bug found using valgrind.
Volker
(This used to be commit 0c6c71ae3c)
but the version before did not either, so we're not worse than before.
One thing this does better is to call the domain init code if it's not there
yet.
Volker
(This used to be commit 35bcfb185b)
Initialize a domain structure properly. Excerpt from wb_init_domain.c:
/*
* Initialize a domain:
*
* - With schannel credentials, try to open the SMB connection with the machine
* creds. Fall back to anonymous.
*
* - If we have schannel creds, do the auth2 and open the schannel'ed netlogon
* pipe.
*
* - Open LSA. If we have machine creds, try to open with ntlmssp. Fall back
* to schannel and then to anon bind.
*
* - With queryinfopolicy, verify that we're talking to the right domain
*
* A bit complex, but with all the combinations I think it's the best we can
* get. NT4, W2k3SP1 and W2k all have different combinations, but in the end we
* have a signed&sealed lsa connection on all of them.
*
* Is this overkill? In particular the authenticated SMB connection seems a
* bit overkill, given that we do schannel for netlogon and ntlmssp for
* lsa later on w2k3, the others don't do this anyway.
*/
Thanks to Jeremy for his detective work, and to the Samba4 team for providing
such a great infrastructure.
Next step is to connect to SAM. Do it via LDAP if we can, fall back to samr
with all we have.
Volker
(This used to be commit 3e69fdc07c)
start to look sane.
Question: What about providing all winbind commands as irpc interfaces that
are called from the samba3 compatibility layer? This way it would be easy for
other samba components to access its functionality. Does that make sense?
Volker
(This used to be commit 2a6b805385)
queryinfopolicy. Idea is to get a consistency check between that and our
notion of the domain name and sid, and take the lsa pipe as the holder of the
central smbcli_tree that netlogon and samr use as well.
Volker
(This used to be commit 126c80aefc)
for it pending.
Also fix a bug with timed events: Don't call the same event recursively in the
handler's inner semi-async event loop.
Volker
(This used to be commit e38e50127a)
Tridge, if you have time, you might want to look at the segfault I was still
seeing. Now I store the handle to the netlogon pipe in the global winbind
state and free it on the next entry into check_machacc. The problem seems to
be that talloc_free()ing a pipe struct from within a callback function on that
pipe is not possible. I think I can live with that, but it has been not really
obvious. To reproduce the segfault you might want to look at putting a
talloc_free(state->getcreds->out.netlogon) into
wbsrv_samba3_check_machacc_receive_creds. This is called from a dcerpc
callback function.
In particular if the check failed it would be nice if I could delete the pipe
directly and not post a different event to some winbind queue.
I tried to delete the pipe from a timed event triggered immediately, but this
also fails because the inner loop seems to hit the same event again, calling
it twice.
Volker
(This used to be commit 5436d77648)
stuff.
- don't use SMBCLI_REQUEST_* state's in the genreic composite stuff
- move monitor_fn to libnet.
NOTE: I have maybe found some bugs, in code that is dirrectly in DONE or ERROR
state in the _send() function. I haven't fixed this bugs in this
commit! We may need some composite_trigger_*() functions or so.
And maybe some other generic helper functions...
metze
(This used to be commit 4527815a0a)
domain and gets the DC's name via a mailslot call.
Metze, I renamed wbsrv_queue_reply to wbsrv_send_reply in accordance with
irpc_send_reply. Having _queue_ here and _send_ there is a bit confusing. And
as everything is async anyway, the semantics should not be too much of a
problem.
Volker
(This used to be commit 4637964b19)
- remove the echo test stuff
- abstract out the used protocol
- we have a seperate handler for the samba3 protocol now
- the backend can easy do async replies
by setting WBSRV_CALL_FLAGS_REPLY_ASYNC in wbsrv_call
and then call wbsrv_queue_reply() later
metze
(This used to be commit 32f3e68a56)
