IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Before we have been trying to cram three cases into a boolean return
value:
* cmdline had secrets, we burnt them -> true
* cmdline had no secrets, all good -> false
* cmdline has NULL string, WTF! emergency! -> false
This return value is only used by Python which wants to know whether to
go to the trouble of replacing the command line. If samba_cmdline_burn()
returns false, no action is taken.
If samba_cmdline_burn() burns a password and then hits a NULL, it would
be better not to do nothing. It would be better to crash. And that is
what Python will end up doing, by some talloc returning NULL triggering
a MemoryError.
What about the case like {"--foo", NULL, "-Ua%b"} where the secret comes
after the NULL? That will still be ignored by Python, as it is by all C
tools, but we are hoping that can't happen anyway.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit d3d8dffc02)
We weren't treating "--password secret" the same as "--password=secret",
which sometimes led to secrets not being redacted.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit 53a1184525)
If argv contains a secret option without an '=' (or in the case of
"-U", the username is separated by space), we will get to the
`if (strlen(p) == ulen) { continue; }` without resetting the found
and is_user variables. This *sometimes* has the right effect, because
the next string in argv ought to contain the secret.
But in a case like {"--password", "1234567890"}, where the secret
string is the same length as the option, we *again* take that branch
and the password is not redacted, though the argument after it will be
unless it is also of the same length.
If we always set the flags at the start we avoid this. This makes
things worse in the short term for secrets that are not the same
length as their options, but we'll get to that in another commit soon.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit 2f6020cf3d)
We return true from this function when a secret has been erased,
and were accidentally treating as if it had secrets.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit f3b240da5c)
ldap server require strong auth = allow_sasl_over_tls
is now an alias for 'allow_sasl_without_tls_channel_bindings'
and should be avoided and changed to 'yes' or
'allow_sasl_without_tls_channel_bindings'.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15621
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6c17e3d280)
gnutls_session_channel_binding(GNUTLS_CB_TLS_SERVER_END_POINT)
is only available with gnutls 3.7.2, but we still want to
support older gnutls versions and that's easily doable...
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15621
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2f2af3aa8a)
Without a valid loadparm_context we can't connect.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2435ab1ad7)
* BUG 15569: Many qsort() comparison functions are non-transitive, which
can lead to out-of-bounds access in some circumstances.
Signed-off-by: Jule Anger <janger@samba.org>
If two strings are invalid UTF-8, the string is first compared with
memcmp(), which compares as unsigned char.
If the strings are of different lengths and one is a substring of the
other, the memcmp() returns 0 and a second comparison is made which
assumes the next character in the shorter string is '\0' -- but this
comparison was done using SIGNED chars (on most systems). That leads
to non-transitive comparisons.
Consider the strings {"a\xff", "a", "ab\xff"} under that system.
"a\xff" < "a", because (char)0xff == -1.
"ab\xff" > "a", because 'b' == 98.
"ab\xff" < "a\xff", because memcmp("ab\xff", "a\xff", 2) avoiding the
signed char tiebreaker.
(Before c49c48afe0, the final character
might br arbitrarily cast into another character -- in latin-1, for
example, the 0xff here would have been seen as 'ÿ', which would be
uppercased to 'Ÿ', which is U+0178, which would be truncated to
'\x78', a positive char.
On the other hand e.g. 0xfe, 'þ', would have mapped to 0xde, 'Þ',
remaining negative).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit e2051eebd4)
This also sorts NULLs after invalid DNs, which matches the comment
above.
CID 1596622.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit af7654331f)
This isn't supposed to be used for sorting, but it is hard to say it
won't be, so we might as well make it sort properly.
Following long-standing behaviour, we try to sort "FALSE" > "TRUE", by
length, then switch to using strncasecmp().
strncasecmp would sort the other way, so we swap the operands. This is
to make e.g. "TRUE\0" sort the same as "TRUE".
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit a75c98ad68)
If both DNs are invalid, we can say they are equal.
This means invalid or NULL DNs will sort to the end of the array,
before deleted DNs:
[ valid DNs, sorted | invalid/NULL DNs | deleted DNs, sorted ]
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 7280c8e53f)
dn1 and dn2 can be invalid but still occupying memory.
(ldb_dn_validate(dn2) does contain a NULL check, but a lot more besides).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 341b8fb60e)
This changes the behaviour of the DN syntax .comparison_fn when being
used in a search, if the search key is a deleted DN.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 7035659256)
these tend to go to the end of the sorted array.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 11d5a80932)
We were always returning -1 for a deleted object, which works for an
equality test, but not a relative comparison.
This sorts deleted DNs toward the end of the list -- except when both
DNs are deleted. What should happen there is yet to be determined.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit db963b1674)
This function compares blobs that might be SID strings or might be SID
structures. Until now, if they were both (seemingly) strings, they were
compared as strings, otherwise if either was a string it was converted to
a structure blob, then the blobs were compared. This had two big problems:
1. There is variety in the way a SID can be stringified. For example,
"s-1-02-3" means the same SID as "S-1-2-3", but those wouldn't compare
equal.
2. SID comparison was crazily non-transitive. Consider the three values
a = "S-1-2-3-4-5",
b = "S-1-9-1",
c = SID("S-1-11-1"), where c is a struct and the others are string.
then we had,
a < b, because the 5th character '2' < '9'.
a > c, because when converted to a structure, the number of sub-auths
is the first varying byte. a has 3, c has 0.
b < c, because after the sub-auth count comes the id_auth value
(big-endian, which doesn't matter in this case).
That made the function unreliable for sorting, AND for simple equality
tests. Also it leaked.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6722e80d1b)
We rearrange rather than just replacing the subtraction, because that
would call ntohl() more than necessary, and I think the flow is a bit
clearer this way.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 7ba6fcb936)
We were returning -1 in all these cases:
ldb_dn_compare(dn, NULL);
ldb_dn_compare(NULL, dn);
ldb_dn_compare(NULL, NULL);
which would give strange results in sort, where this is often used.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 5fe488d515)
We assume no values is unlikely, since we have been dereferencing
->values[0] forever, with no known reports of trouble.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit d4e69734c6)
There are further changes coming here.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit d785c1991c)
We can still have inconsistent comparisons, because two elements with
the same number of values will always return -1 if they are unequal,
which means they will sort differently depending on the order in which
they are compared.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 21a071e486)
In some situations, like comparison functions for qsort, we don't care
about the actual value, just whethger it was greater or less than
zero.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6159b098cf)
If these are truly unicode codepoints (< ~2m) there is no overflow,
but the type is defined as uint32_t.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 675fdeee3d)
We have changed strcasecmp_m() to return -1 in a place where it used
to return -3. This upset a test, but it shouldn't have: the exact
value of the negative int is not guaranteed by the function.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit d4ce8231f9)
We now test cases:
1. where the first string compares less
2. one of the strings ends before the other
3. the strings differ on a character other than the first.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit a512759d7b)
strncasecmp_m is supposed to return a negative, zero, or positive
number, not necessarily the difference between the codepoints in
the first character that differs, which we have been asserting up to
now.
This fixes a knownfail on 32 bit.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit dda0bb6fc7)
strcasecmp_m is supposed to return a negative, zero, or positive
number, depending on whether the first argument is less than, equal to,
or greater than the second argument (respectively).
We have been asserting that it returns exactly the difference between
the codepoints in the first character that differs.
This fixes a knownfail on 32 bit.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit ac0a8cd92c)
In other places we tend to include tsort.h, which also has TYPESAFE_QSORT.
ldb.h already has TYPESAFE_QSORT, so it might as well have NUMERIC_CMP.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit de1b94f79e)
In many places we use `return a - b;` in a comparison function. This can
be problematic if the comparison is used in a sort, as `a - b` is not
guaranteed to do what we expect. For example:
* if a and b are 2s-complement ints, a is INT_MIN and b is INT_MAX, then
a - b = 1, which is wrong.
* if a and b are 64 bit pointers, a - b could wrap around many times in
a cmp function returning 32 bit ints. (We do this often).
The issue is not just that a sort could go haywire.
Due to a bug in glibc, this could result in out-of-bounds access:
https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/01/30/7
(We have replicated this bug in ldb_qsort).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 5ab93f48c5)
Usually we are dealing with a filename that tells you what the pipe is,
and there is no reason for this debug helper not to be convenient
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8b6a584170)
If a compare function is non-transitive (for example, if it evaluates
A > B and B > C, but A < C), this implementation of qsort could access
out-of-bounds memory. This was found in glibc's qsort by Qualys, and
their write-up for OSS-Security explains it very well:
https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/01/30/7
An example of a non-transitive compare is one in which does this
int cmp(const void *_a, const void *_b)
{
int a = *(int *)_a;
int b = *(int *)_b;
return a - b;
}
which does the right thing when the magnitude of the numbers is small,
but which will go wrong if a is INT_MIN and b is INT_MAX. Likewise, if
a and b are e.g. uint32_t, the value can wrap when cast to int.
We have functions that are non-transitive regardless of subtraction.
For example, here (which is not used with ldb_qsort):
int codepoint_cmpi(codepoint_t c1, codepoint_t c2)
if (c1 == c2 ||
toupper_m(c1) == toupper_m(c2)) {
return 0;
}
return c1 - c2;
}
The toupper_m() is only called on equality case. Consider {'a', 'A', 'B'}.
'a' == 'A'
'a' > 'B' (lowercase letters come after upper)
'A' < 'B'
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15569
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 73e4f6026a)
While Active Directory does not support yet RFC 8009 encryption and
checksum types, it is possible to verify these checksums when running
with both MIT Kerberos and Heimdal Kerberos. This matters for FreeIPA
domain controller which uses them by default.
[2023/06/16 21:51:04.923873, 10, pid=51149, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
../../lib/krb5_wrap/krb5_samba.c:1496(smb_krb5_kt_open_relative)
smb_krb5_open_keytab: resolving: FILE:/etc/samba/samba.keytab
[2023/06/16 21:51:04.924196, 2, pid=51149, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0),
class=auth] ../../auth/kerberos/kerberos_pac.c:66(check_pac_checksum)
check_pac_checksum: Checksum Type 20 is not supported
[2023/06/16 21:51:04.924228, 5, pid=51149, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0),
class=auth] ../../auth/kerberos/kerberos_pac.c:353(kerberos_decode_pac)
PAC Decode: Failed to verify the service signature: Invalid argument
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15635
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8e931fce12)
Autobuild-User(v4-20-test): Jule Anger <janger@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(v4-20-test): Tue Apr 16 12:24:55 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
- documentation fixes
- build with Python 3.12 (bug #15513)
- a lot of additional error checking in
the python bindings
- minor code fixes
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15513
Signed-off-by: Jule Anger <janger@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
