IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
to the C standard an enum is guarenteed to be an (int), which means
for 4 byte ints specifying a type of 0x80000000 is an invalid value.
The Solaris compiler complains about this. Fix by adding an (int)
cast in front of the value generation.
Jeremy.
- Add/change "wellKnownObjects" attributes
- Order entries in "provision_basedn_modify.ldif"
- Add/change "delete entries" object under BASEDN and CONFIGDN
- Fix default version number of "Default domain policy" group policy
- Add "domain updates" objects for interoperability with MS AD maintaining tools
- Show version number in the "oEMInformation" attribute (suggested by ekacnet)
- Smaller fixups
Additional notes:
- Bump the level to Windows Server 2008 R2 (we should support always the latest
version - if we provision ourself)
- In "descriptor.c" the check for the "domainFunctionality" level shouldn't be
needed: ACL owner groups (not owner user) are supported since Windows 2000
Server (first AD edition)
- I took the argument from: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/329194
- Introduce the "userAccountControl", "groupType" and "sAMAccountType" flags
- Corrects the "domain/forestFunctionality" and "domainControllerFunctionality" flags
- Reorders the header file to have the order "userAccountFlags", "groupType",
"sAMAccountType" (matches the order in the flag_mapping.c and samldb module)
- Fixes the group account flags properly up
- Fixes the flags for "domain/forestFunctionality" and "domainControllerFunctionality"
up
This code eventually calls into mk_priv in the Heimdal code, and if
the client is behind NAT, or somehow has an odd idea about it's own
network addresses, it will fail to accept this packet if we set an
address. It seems easiser not to. (Found by testing with NetAPP at
plugfest)
Andrew Bartlett
Testing against NetAPP showed that clients can object to being told a
larger max xmit fragment size than they negotiated. Choose the
minimum of the server and client values.
Andrew Bartlett
