IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This parameter adds complexity to our brlock implementation that I don't think
is justified. Not a lot of complexity, but if we would want to really support
it we'd need tests. Instead of doing those, I think removing the parameter is
the better choice.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jun 18 14:47:08 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Jul 25 06:28:21 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
Thanks to Frans Luteijn <f.a.g.luteijn at knoware.nl> for providing the fixes!
Autobuild-User(master): Björn Jacke <bj@sernet.de>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Jun 11 23:16:26 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
vl recently pointed me to a valid reason to use posix locking = no.
Fix the smb.conf manpage to explain this reason, as this question
comes up on the samba mailing list from time to time as well.
Autobuild-User: Kai Blin <kai@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Wed Dec 1 10:37:30 CET 2010 on sn-devel-104
