IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
lock we know nothing about that we retry the lock every
10 seconds instead of waiting for the standard select
timeout. This is how we used to (and are supposed to)
work.
Jeremy.
locking/locking.c we have to send retry messages to timed lock holders.
The majority of this patch passes a "struct messaging_context" down
there. No functional change, survives make test.
works - even with the strange "initial delete on close"
semantics. The "initial delete on close" flag isn't
committed to the share mode db until the handle is
closed, and is discarded if any real "delete on close"
was set. This allows me to remove the "initial_delete_on_close"
flag from the share db, and move it into a BOOL in files_struct.
Warning ! You must do a make clean after this. Cope with
the wrinkle in directory delete on close which is done
differently from files. We now pass all Samba4 smbtortute
BASE-DELETE tests except for the one checking that files
can't be created in a directory which has the delete on
close set (possibly expensive to fix).
Jeremy.
Allow us to correctly refuse to set delete on close on a
non-empty directory. There are still some delete-on-close
wrinkles to be fixed, but I understand how to do that better
now. I'll fix this tomorrow.
Jeremy.
fix the messaging code to call the efficient calls :
save_re_uid()
set_effective_uid(0);
messaging_op
restore_re_uid();
instead of using heavyweight become_root()/unbecome_root()
pairs around all messaging code. Fixup the messaging
code to ensure sec_init() is called (only once) so that non-root
processes still work when sending messages.
This is a lighter weight solution to become_root()/unbecome_root()
(which swaps all the supplemental groups) and should be more
efficient. I will migrate all server code over to using this
(a similar technique should be used in the passdb backend
where needed).
Jeremy.
of the lock array in order to delete them individually
it's also important to make a copy of the *size* of
this array. Otherwise the unlock decrements the termination
index of your for loop :-). Doh ! Big thanks to Volker
for showing me how to set up the build farm to track
this one down. This is not a 3.0.23a issue.
Jeremy.
region between detecting a pending lock was needed
and when we added the blocking lock record. Make
sure that we hold the lock over all this period.
Removed the old code for doing blocking locks on
SMB requests that never block (the old SMBlock
and friends).
Discovered something interesting about the strange
NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT return. If we asked
for a lock with zero timeout, and we got an error
of NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT, treat it as though
it was a blocking lock with a timeout of 150 - 300ms.
This only happens when timeout is sent as zero and
can be seen quite clearly in ethereal. This is the
real replacement for old do_lock_spin() code.
Re-worked the blocking lock select timeout to correctly
use milliseconds instead of the old second level
resolution (far too coarse for this work).
Jeremy.
test. Phew - that was painful :-). But what it means
is that we now implement lock cancels and I can add
lock cancels into POSIX lock handling which will fix
the fast/slow system call issue with cifsfs !
Jeremy.
We shouldn't allow this on the same smbd, but the cifsfs
client negotiates POSIX locks then sends Windows ones.
Doh ! Can't fix shipped client code....
Jeremy.
