IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This has been moved to async in 2009
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu May 17 11:30:18 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
This has an async code path hidden inside. Expose that properly.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This is meant to replace the synchronous "dispatch_table".
The current dispatch_table assumes that every synchronous function does
the request_ok or request_error itself. This mixes two concerns: Doing
the work and shipping the reply to the winbind client. This new dispatch
table will make it possible to centralize shipping the reply to the
client. At a later stage this will enable easier statistics on how long
request processing took precisely.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue May 15 21:12:33 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13369
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri May 11 12:02:37 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13369
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13369
Pair-Programmed-With: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Calling the top level winbindd API would probably be more appropriate,
but we lack certain structures. We introduce this call in order to
return the result to NETLOGON (in order to give site-aware and domain
aware DC location).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13365
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This was (possibly) used as an example in the early days of the async winbind
code we have today. It's not necessary to send this through a full tevent_req
round.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Apr 24 17:18:23 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
Probably not really a problem, but we have generate_random(), so why not
use it?
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
A LOOKUPNAME request with a domain and a name containing a winbind
separator character would return the result for the joined domain,
instead of the specified domain.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13312
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Apr 6 21:03:31 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
This is required because we need a new pointer for LDB after the fork,
and with LMDB we can not longer rely on tdb_reopen_all() to do that
for us.
This can not be done in reinit_after_fork() due to the dependency loop
this would create.
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The other allocator for this structure uses talloc_zero()
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Mar 24 07:21:37 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
This is very, very unlikely but possible as in the AD case the RPC server is in
another process that may eventually be able to restart.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
This domain is very close, in AD DC configurations over a internal ncacn_np pipe
and otherwise in the same process via C linking. It is however very expensive
to re-create the binding handle per SID->name lookup, so keep a cache.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13332
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Mar 15 20:57:44 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
This catches more errors and triggers retry as appropriate.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13332
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
The calls were missing the negation operator, a retry should be
attempted is the binding handle got somehow disconnected behind the
scenes and is NOT connected.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13332
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
