IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This reverts commit 961c4b591b.
Subsequent commits will add the same functionality as an optional
feature.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12177
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 30 15:24:02 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
This only makes sure the code compiles again. I'm not able to test this
yet.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rowland Penny <rpenny@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 30 09:21:09 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
A shared rpc modules directory may not exist if all RPC modules are built
static.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12184
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This essentially reverts 1c4284c739. We now call an alien function from
within pthreadpool, and we should not hold a mutex during that call. The alien
function could (and pthreadpool_tevent_job_signal actually does) lock a mutex.
We can't guarantee proper lock ordering here, so in theory we could deadlock. I
haven't seen it in the wild yet, but I could imagine that both _parent pieces
in pthreadpool and tevent could trigger such a deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 30 04:06:20 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Aug 29 22:51:34 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
Otherwise, anything that the transaction has already done to the DB will be left in the DB
even despite the failure. For example, if a fix wrote to the DB, but then failed a post-write
check, then the fix will not be unrolled.
This is because we do not have nested transactions in TDB.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12178
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Aug 29 12:46:21 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
dbcheck of the rid pool (CN=RID Set) for another server will otherwise fail because
rIDNextRid is not replicated, and so it not present
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12178
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10882
Autobuild-User(master): Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Aug 29 08:53:14 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
This file was about updating early Samba AD alpha versions.
We describe all important things related to the update process in the Wiki:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba
Signed-off-by: Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Aug 29 03:28:11 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
If the user specified the username in the URI with with:
smb://DOMAIN;user:secret@server/share
the tool should not prompt for the username nor the password.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12175
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Aug 26 04:22:27 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
With a binary search, this can only be tested on 3+ elements.
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 25 14:22:25 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
This doesn't fix the partialAttrSetEx case, so the test is left in the
knownfail file.
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This has an odd behaviour where PartialAttrSetEx does not respect the
incoming mapping. PartialAttrSetEx is not respected in Samba at all.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
On Windows this does not seem to fail, but causes silent errors.
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This will cause silent errors in the translation, but as far as we know,
Windows will accept it just fine.
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
That was the original plan - not to fail existing envs, but for subunit
not to fail, it is not sufficient to just return 0 from the script.
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 25 09:39:43 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
During path checking, the vfs connectpath_fn is called to
determine the share's root, relative to the file being
queried (for example, in snapshot file this may be other
than the share's "usual" root directory). connectpath_fn
must be able to answer this question even if the path does
not exist and its parent does exist. The convention in this
case is that this refers to a yet-uncreated file under the parent
and all queries are relative to the parent.
This also serves as a workaround for the case where connectpath_fn
has to handle wildcards, as with the case of SMB1 trans2 findfirst.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12172
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 25 05:35:29 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
Add tests which verify that a snapshot file is readable
if and only if it its metadata can be retrieved. Also
verify (in most tests) that file is retrieved from the
correct snapshot.
Together with the existing test for number of previous
versions we can stat, this test checks that we can read
those files, and also that we cannot break out of a snapshot
if wide links are not allowed.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12172
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This will allow reading them and verifying we got the right version
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12172
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
