IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This corrects parts of 378295c3fe and
301d59caf2. This is seen if CC="ccache
gcc" and CPP isn't used for some reason.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-User(master): Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Mar 24 06:17:55 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
In particular, the Samba dbwrap wrapper can do this for schannel_store,
with the openhook set to clear the database if it can get the lock
(which, being in the same process, it can).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-User(master): Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Mar 23 09:39:50 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
uint64_t are not unsigned longs on 32-bit platforms:
[3265/3996] Compiling source3/modules/vfs_btrfs.c
../source3/modules/vfs_btrfs.c: In function ‘btrfs_copy_chunk_send’:
../source3/modules/vfs_btrfs.c:118:3: error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format]
../source3/modules/vfs_btrfs.c:118:3: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘int64_t’ [-Werror=format]
../source3/modules/vfs_btrfs.c:118:3: error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format]
../source3/modules/vfs_btrfs.c:118:3: error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format]
../source3/modules/vfs_btrfs.c: In function ‘btrfs_copy_chunk_recv’:
../source3/modules/vfs_btrfs.c:180:2: error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘off_t’ [-Werror=format]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
for i in $(seq 1 20000) ; do echo dir ; done | smbclient //127.0.0.1/tmp -U%
without and with this patch:
$ time bin/smbd -d0 -i
smbd version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-1f139ae started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2013
Beendet
real 0m28.342s
user 0m10.249s
sys 0m10.513s
$ time bin/smbd -d0 -i
smbd version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-1f139ae started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2013
Beendet
real 0m27.348s
user 0m9.089s
sys 0m10.853s
The "real" timestamp is irrelevant, this also contains the time between
starting smbd and the smbclient job. It's the "user" time. The result that this
patch improves the time spent in user space by 10% is consistent.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Mar 22 22:10:57 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
As part of forcibly disconnecting a client from a share,
smbd must atomically call reload_services() to ensure that
the entry in the ServicePtrs[] array corresponding to
that share is removed if the share was removed from
the smb.conf or registry entries.
Otherwise the ServicePtrs[] array entry for the share
remains active and the client races to auto-reconnect to
the share before a second message to reload the smb.conf
file can be sent.
This has to be done as part of the close-share message
processing, as removing the share from the smb.conf file
first, then telling the smbd to reload followed by the
forcible disconnect message doesn't work as in this
sequence of events when the reload message is received
the client is still connected to the share, so the
ServicePtrs[] entry is still left active.
The forcible-disconnect + service reload has to be done
together as an atomic operation in order for this to work.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Mar 22 20:10:11 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
On Solaris/Nexenta/Illumos once a pipe is full it will not be reported
as writable until PIPE_BUF (actually on Solaris 4096, which is less than
PIPE_BUF) bytes have been read from it.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Mar 22 18:16:45 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
Ensure the test code will pass against such a system (allow writes/reads
going both ways).
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Mar 22 16:18:06 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
AIX acl code needs to be built by default on AIX,
otherwise smbd will fail to start because of missing symbols
This fixes Bug 9557 - build succeeds, but binaries don't run
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian Ambach <ambi@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Christian Ambach <ambi@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Mar 21 16:31:19 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Mar 20 21:53:20 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
LARGE_READX test shows it's always safe to return a short read.
Windows does so. Do the calculations to return what will fit
in a read depending on what the client negotiated.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
We're going to replace this with a function that calculates
the max PDU to return on a read and supports short reads.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Subtract 4 from smb_size (39) here as the length
of the SMB reply following the 4 byte type+length
field can be up to 0xFFFFFF bytes.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
They have to cope with large READX call replies that have
a length greater than smb_len_nbt() can handle.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Windows servers take a look at the FLAGS2_SMB_SECURITY_SIGNATURES_REQUIRED
flag during a session setup and turn on signing if the client requires it.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This should allow smbclient to keep using large reads against older Samba versions
(<= 3.6.x) and other servers that may also require this.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Older Samba releases (<= 3.6.x)
expect the client to send CAP_LARGE_READX
in order to let the client use large reads.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Gregor Beck <gbeck@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Christian Ambach <ambi@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Christian Ambach <ambi@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Mar 20 17:08:52 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
forgot to bump this earlier when removing the counters for setdir
Signed-off-by: Christian Ambach <ambi@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Mar 18 11:39:27 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Mar 17 12:56:47 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
The is_encrypted_packet() function should only be used on the raw received data
to determine if a packet came in encrypted. Once we're inside the SMB1
processing code in smbd/reply.c we should be looking at the
smb1request->encrypted field to determine if a packet was really encrypted or
not.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Mar 16 12:44:44 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Mar 15 20:22:08 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
