IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
On a cluster we need to use the ctdb controlled database and not
a local secrets.tdb...
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15714
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 20 05:54:43 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
This will allow doing tests and make sure using anonymous credentials
doesn't cause false positive results...
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15714
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Without this we leave stale sharemode entries around that can lead to all sorts
of havoc.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Sep 19 19:36:19 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
This demonstrates the dead lock after a durable reconnect failed
because the stat info changed, the file can't be accessed anymore
as we leak the incomplete share mode entry in a still running
process.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Creates and opens two files with leases, then tries
rename-with-overwrite on file_src -> file_dst.
Ensures we get a lease break on file_dst before
getting the access denied response.
Passes against Windows, fails against Samba.
Add knownfail.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 18 05:42:15 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
When inherting permissions on the created stream, we call into the VFS to fetch
the streams security descriptor via inherit_access_posix_acl() ->
copy_access_posix_acl() -> SMB_VFS_SYS_ACL_SET_FD() passing the stream fsp which
triggers the assert SMB_ASSERT(!fsp_is_alternate_stream(fsp)) in
vfswrap_sys_acl_set_fd() in vfs_default.
Just passing the base fsp to the VFS fixes this.
vfs_streams_depot which *does use* distinct backend filesystem files for the
streams, currently does not apply permissions to the stream files at all, so the
incomplete behaviour of vfs_streams_depot is not affected by this change.
If in the future someone want to fix this defficiency in vfs_streams_depot, the
module code can use fsp->stream_fsp to base decisions in VFS ops whether the
module should carry out some action.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15695
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Sep 2 08:55:28 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
As per MS-FSA 2.1.5.10.22 FSCTL_QUERY_ALLOCATED_RANGES, if response
range entries exceed in_max_output, then we should respond with
STATUS_BUFFER_OVERFLOW and a truncated output buffer.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15699
Reported-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Aug 28 08:54:11 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
FSCTL_QUERY_ALLOCATED_RANGES responses with more than one range should
be truncated to account for a ioctl.smb2.in.max_output_response limit.
Add a test for this.
Flag the new test knownfail; fix in subsequent commit.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
These tests are not affected by the reserved_usn change, so there is
no need to run them twice.
The test_repl_get_tgt_multivalued_links fails with or without
reserved_usn set to zero, but it fails differently in either case.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15701
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jennifer Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Azure AD will set reserved_usn to zero when we expect it to be
the number we gave them.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15701
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jennifer Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This emulates the behaviour of Azure AD.
As this is quite slow we will later reduce the test load in this case,
but for now we want to run all the getncchanges tests this way.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15701
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jennifer Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Currently we do this in mkdir_internal():
mkdirat(client_name);
if (EEXIST) {
return EEXIST;
}
prepare_acls(client_name);
Note 'prepare_acls()' is a placeholder for the complex steps
it is doing to prepare the directory. During these steps
we have the problem that other clients already see
the directory and are able to create files or subdirectories
in it and these may not inherit the correct acls as
the their parent directory is not created completely.
I think I found a good strategie even without relying on
renameat2(RENAME_NOREPLACE).
We would do this instead:
tmp_name = ".::TMPNAME:D:$PID:client_name"
mkdirat(tmp_name, mode=client_mode);
prepare_acls(tmp_name);
mkdirat(client_name, mode=0);
if (EEXIST) {
unlinkat(tmp_name);
return EEXIST;
}
renameat(tmp_name, client_name);
So instead of having a long windows during prepare_acls,
we just have a short window between mkdirat(client_name, mode=0)
and renameat(tmp_name, client_name);
And in that short window the directory with the client_name
has a mode of 0, so it's not possible for other clients
to create files or subdirs in it.
As the mkdirat(client_name, mode=0) still catches
EEXIST the race where two clients try to create
the same client_name is closed as before,
so we don't need any other protection.
Following patches will make use of renameat2(RENAME_NOREPLACE),
but this already a very good improvement.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15693
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
This reproduces a race where one client creates
a directory and other clients see it before
the directory is fully setup including the correct
permissions and similar things.
We have a DENY ACE for SEC_DIR_ADD_FILE, which means
that files can't be created. This is set on
a base directory 'mkdir_visible'.
Then we have a lot of async loops trying to create
a file called 'mkdir_visible\dir\file_NR'. These loop
as fast as possible expecting OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND,
because 'mkdir_visible\dir' is not there.
Then we send a create for 'mkdir_visible\dir' and
expect that to work.
This should turn the 'mkdir_visible\dir\file_NR' loop
into getting ACCESS_DENIED, because the
DENY ACE for SEC_DIR_ADD_FILE should be inherited
before 'mkdir_visible\dir' is visible to other clients.
Because of the complex steps in mkdir_internal(),
smbd allows the creation 'mkdir_visible\dir\file_NR',
as 'mkdir_visible\dir' is already visible after the
mkdirat(), before the DENY ACE is inherited.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15693
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15696
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 13 22:29:28 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
This shows that all compound related requests should get
NT_STATUS_NETWORK_SESSION_EXPIRED.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15696
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Not adding a specific test for per-user hide files as that uses the exact same
mechanism as the per-user veto files.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Likely not needed anymore since we now cleanup the fileserver env.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This was likely taken by copy/paste from somewhere else where it might have made
sense.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This ensures provision() can remove st/fileserver/* from previous runs.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This ensures provision() can remove st/simpleserver/* from previous runs.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
provision_ctdb() was always called with $no_delete_prefix undefined
from setup_ctdb(), so we can just remove the check.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jo Sutton <jsutton@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jul 23 23:47:43 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
There is no longer any meaningful distinction between the two files.
Signed-off-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
They are both only for debugging problems.
In normal runs we don't need them and this avoids leaving to many
/tmp/pam.* directories arround.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9705
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
The test needs --option="torture:Forest_Trust_Dom2_Binding=..." in order
to be useful, so the skip is correct, but the knownfail entry should
have been removed with e5163dfd57.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
In standalone setups we use the PAM stack to verify
the plaintext authentication, so we need to pass it
down...
There are still production systems out there
(legacy audio/video recording systems...)
using this.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9705
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Jul 17 11:17:54 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
This allows testing a plaintext password authentication
on a standalone server using the PAM stack to verify it.
There are still production systems out in the wild using this...
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9705
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Updating things like the bad pwd count should not clear the
stored LM HASH with 'lanman auth = no'.
This allows testing with 'lanman auth = no' and 'lanman auth = yes'.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9705
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This demonstrates that we currently have problems with
plaintext and lanman authentication. In both domain member
and standalone setups.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9705
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Note that the LM HASH is only generated for passwords
up to 14 characters...
We use extra_options_before_inject in order to
allow overriding any existing parameter.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9705
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This allows overriding any existing parameter.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9705
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
We burn arguments to all unknown options containing "pass" (e.g.
"--passionate=false") in case they are a password option, but is bad
in the case where the unknown option takes no argument but the next
option *is* a password (like "--overpass --password2 barney". In that
case "--password2" would be burnt and not "barney".
The burning behaviour doesn't change with this commit, but users will now
see an error message explaining that the option was unknown. This is not
so much aimed at end users -- for who an invalid option will hopefully
lead to --help like output -- but to developers who add a new "pass"
option.
This also slightly speeds up the processing of known password options,
which is a little bit important because we are in a race to replace the
command line in /proc before an attacker sees it.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Douglas Bagnall <dbagnall@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Jul 10 06:28:08 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
This is the long form of -U in samba-tool.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
We have more secret arguments, like --client-password, --adminpass,
so we are going to use an allowlist for options containing 'pass', but
we don't want to burn the likes of --group=passionfruit.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
We weren't treating "--password secret" the same as "--password=secret",
which sometimes led to secrets not being redacted.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
