IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
When you update an #ifdef'ed function, also update its matching null function
or all hell breaks loose on the build farm!
Andrew Bartlett
(This used to be commit 58b981a56f99bce0e98c9e1752c99a69e3cb2a25)
Added vfs calls to symlink() and readlink() with appropriate configure
checks.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit c24e6b41ea60ab4bac2fcd19da947851d6df3c7c)
hi jeremy,
can you commit the following patch against HEAD. I can't do it right now
Thanks Tim for me. He changed the SAM_DISPINFO_1 array without checking if
he didn't break the server code. And he did.
So on my way I cleaned info_1, 2, .. 5
it may break winbind. I leave to tim the pleasure to fix it ;-)
jf.
I added some talloc changes and checks for alloc fails.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 001e9b7b540f04c80ba65c879aaa41acddc86f3e)
server manager first. Just use the -U parameter to smbpasswd when joining
the domain:
smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -U administrator%password
Should also work with domain users with the 'add workstation to domain'
user right.
(This used to be commit 937b96feaa276f8dd626f2d640f03dc4c55f48c6)
server, Win9x only sends \PIPE instead of \PIPE\. Looks suspiciously like
an off-by one bug in the Win9x dce/rpc pipe code.
(This used to be commit b4a9079833c261705e18fdcaab752cb5292a078f)
people are reporting regarding multiple responses to queries on <1D> names.
There should only ever be one LMB but some users are seeing multiple replies
to queries for the LMB name. This is probably due to nodes on the LAN that
have NetBIOS over NetBEUI and/or IPX enabled. Previously, the debug message
did not include the IP address associated with the name. It *did* include
the source address of the packet, but in the examples I've seen all of these
were the same, eg:
[2000/06/22 11:58:25, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(93)
query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet
129.130.10.136 for name NT.CIS.KSU.EDU<1d>. This response was from IP
129.130.10.24
[2000/06/22 11:58:25, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(93)
query_name_response: Multiple (3) responses received for a query on subnet
129.130.10.136 for name NT.CIS.KSU.EDU<1d>. This response was from IP
129.130.10.24
[2000/06/22 11:58:25, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(93)
query_name_response: Multiple (4) responses received for a query on subnet
129.130.10.136 for name NT.CIS.KSU.EDU<1d>. This response was from IP
129.130.10.24
[2000/06/22 11:58:25, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(93)
query_name_response: Multiple (5) responses received for a query on subnet
129.130.10.136 for name NT.CIS.KSU.EDU<1d>. This response was from IP
129.130.10.24
Note that all of the above are reported as having come from 129.130.10.24.
This should never happen. If 129.130.10.24 is a WINS server it should
send a Negative Name Query Response for a <1D> name query (wierd but true).
So, are all of the above coming from different systems, all of which
think are the LMB? Are they all coming from one system that is, for some
strange reason, replying five times to the same query?
Anyway, I needed more info so I've changed the debug messages.
Chris -)-----
(This used to be commit 8f2f09af0a0a80cacef933ed500884e2c0b3f2fb)
We now test security=share, security=user, security=server for both the
positive and negitive case (good/bad pw) and check that guest shares work for
share level security.
The server level security stuff seems to test positive without actualy
contating a server (another LIBSMB_PROG based smbd) - I will need to look into that...
Andrew Bartlett
(This used to be commit 19fdc553d6ab06e53c21425468f86da56f4d9153)
This is so I can find out what platforms it fails on. I will pull it again tomorrow if there are too many problems, like > 2 platforms that it fails to build on, but will pop it back in again as I resolve platforms.
(This used to be commit cc72c44e53a36f3da135f4dc10a9391f65c8b6c7)
on RH7.0 with _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE, and probably not
present on non-Unix systems like VMS.
(This used to be commit 8b0a5bc436fb44f5123d037b102f2d2c4d3287e8)
malloc() to talloc(). Previously, creating an ACL containing zero ACEs
would return a non-NULL pointer to zero bytes of memory. The talloc() code
would return a NULL pointer making the ACL a NULL ACL instead of an empty
one. The difference is a NULL ACL allows all access and an empty ACL
denies all access.
We solve this by calling talloc(ctx, sizeof(SEC_ACE) * num_aces + 1).
Heh.
(This used to be commit 89eaaafe7d266788609fab6951fd912c441b3a26)
for NET_SRV_SET_INFO rpc call which is made when double-clicking on a
computer in the server manager and changing the description. We always
return NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO as NT doesn't seem to decode any error messages
passed back.
Maybe the changed comment string could be stored in a tdb and regurgitated
instead of the "server string" smb.conf parameter?
(This used to be commit d936ffedd90fe442f990c9ac2e172877f28d7230)
allow us to have test targets without special configure options
- fixed make proto so that it actually does something
(This used to be commit 55109a752578e9389d853cb27ec17c2114ecff77)
