IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Otherwise the value cache might become outdated.
Autobuild-User: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Mon May 7 16:11:05 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
It simply calls to the regdb functions.
This fixes a caching issue uncovered by recent changes.
Autobuild-User: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sat May 5 04:10:43 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
This prevents race between fetching seqnum and key content.
Because there is currently no way to atomically fetch the
record along with the seqnum, I use a loop.
This is far from optimal and should should ideally be done
differently. But for now it fixes the race.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This prevents race between fetching seqnum and key content.
Because there is currently no way to atomically fetch the
record along with the seqnum, I use a loop.
This is far from optimal and should should ideally be done
differently. But for now it fixes the race.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
The purpose is to prevent next reads from going to disk.
Note that this will currently only be effective with local tdbs, not
with ctdb: For tdb, store and delete bump the seqnum while transaction
commit does not. For ctdb, transaction commit bumps the seqnum, while
store and delete don't... This needs fixing (in ctdb).
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Note that this will currently only be effective in the local TDB implementation.
For CTDB, this wont work since seqnum currently works differently there (needs
fixing): For tdb, store and delete operations bump the db seqnum, while
transaction commits don't. For ctdb, the seqnum is bumped by the transaction
commit but not by store and delete operations.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This is wrong layering (calling into regdb_transaction* in the reg_api code)
but fixes a potential race. It makes the multi-step create procedure atomic.
This should completely be done in the backend.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This is at the wrong layer, but if fixes a race potentially causing
data corruption by concurrent access.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
(there was no lock around fetching the values and storing them)
The layering is wrong in that it uses regdb transactions in reg_api
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This is like regval_ctr_key_exists() but does not return bool,
but the regval_blob instead, if found, and NULL if not found.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Fri Apr 13 02:23:36 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Tue Jan 24 13:54:09 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
This will be used to enforce a lock hierarchy between the databases. We have
seen deadlocks between locking.tdb, brlock.tdb, serverid.tdb and notify*.tdb.
These should be fixed by refusing a dbwrap_fetch_locked that does not follow a
defined lock hierarchy.
As reported by Ismail Doenmez (idonmez@suse.com), sizeof() is
incorrectly used by _reg_perfcount_init_data_block() in an attempt to
determine the length of a talloced array.
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-User: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Wed Jan 4 16:54:37 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sat Dec 3 05:20:30 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
It is importante to not use the database backend implementation
in the upgrade. Otherwise this would only work as long as this
is the newset version. In future versions of the registry, this
(then) intermediate upgrade step would change in behaviour and not
work as expected any more.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Skip the transaction for the upgrade code, if the database
is already at code-level.
Autobuild-User: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Wed Nov 9 15:06:59 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
