IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Remove the sock_exec code which is no longer needed and additionally has been
used by exploit code.
This was originally test support code, the tests relying on the sock_exec
code have been removed.
Past exploits have used sock_exec as a proxy for system() matching a talloc
destructor prototype.
See for example:
Exploit for Samba vulnerabilty (CVE-2015-0240) at
https://gist.github.com/worawit/051e881fc94fe4a49295
and the Red Hat post at
https://access.redhat.com/blogs/766093/posts/1976553
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Nov 20 07:20:13 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Nov 19 15:14:13 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13150
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Nov 18 04:07:24 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
Don't use winbind_messaging_context anymore.
This fixes a bug analysed by Peter Somogyi <PSOMOGYI@hu.ibm.com>: If a
parent winbind forks, it only called reinit_after_fork on
winbind_messaging_context. On the other hand, deep in dbwrap_open we use
server_messaging_context(). This is not reinitialized by
winbind_reinit_after fork, so the parent and child share a ctdb
connection. This is invalid, because replies from ctdb end up in the
wrong process.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13150
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
There's no point in having two global event contexts
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13150
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We need to open the ncacn_np (smb) transport connection with
anonymous credentials.
In order to do netr_ServerPasswordSet*() we need to
establish a 2nd netlogon connection using dcerpc schannel
authentication.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13149
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This demonstrates that "net rpc oldjoin" is currently broken.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13149
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We don't need a separate variable, C passes a copy on the stack
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Do an early return, avoid an "else", avoid an indentation level
Review with git show -b
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We don't need to store it. I prefer this as it shows that we must always
get wakeup_fd from the event context at time of use, rather than possibly
storing an out-of-date variable.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Nov 17 12:43:01 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
We just need one tevent_threaded_context per unique combintation of
tevent event contexts and pthreadpool_tevent pools, not multiple copies
for identical combinations of a tevent contexts and a pthreadpool_tevent
pools.
With this commit we register tevent contexts in a list in the
pthreadpool_tevent structure and will only have one
tevent_threaded_context object per tevent context per pool.
With many pthreadpool_tevent_job_send reqs this pays off, I've seen a
small decrease in cpu-ticks with valgrind callgrind and a modified
local.messaging.ping-speed torture test. The test modification ensured
messages we never directly send, but always submitted via
pthreadpool_tevent_job_send.
Pair-Programmed-With: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Nov 17 02:35:52 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
Use an alarm to break out of waiting for a signal.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13121
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Nov 16 22:27:06 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13140
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Nov 15 19:50:54 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Nov 14 03:55:37 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
Looks surprising, but this does save bytes if you look at the object with
"size".
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We always return in the if-branch before. The else is redundant
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
* Remove unused select backend
* Fix a race condition in tevent_threaded_schedule_immediate()
(bug #13130)
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Nov 13 18:02:46 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Nov 13 14:05:46 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
Test if the server blocks whilst waiting on a kernel lease held by
a non-smbd process.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13121
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Nov 11 20:12:26 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
If a O_NONBLOCK open fails with EWOULDBLOCK, this code changes smbd to
do a retry open every second, until either the timeout or we get a successful
open. If we're opening a file that has a kernel lease set by a non-smbd
process, this is the best we can do.
Prior to this, smbd would block on the second open on such a leased file
(not using O_NONBLOCK) which freezes active clients.
Regression test to follow.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13121
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
It does this if we send a session ID of zero. The server still replied.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13007
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Nov 11 08:44:37 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
init_search_op is about to be removed from the VFS in
a following commit. In the meantime, removing it poses
no issue because he underlying impementation is a no-op.
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This VFS function is about to be removed in a following commit.
In the meantime, not handling it by vfs_media_harmony poses no
issue because the underlying implenentation is a no-op.
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
