IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Ensure that client challenges with the first 5 bytes identical are
rejected.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14497
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
[abartlet@samba.org: backported from master as test order was flipped]
This allows to add expections for individual workstations, when using "server schannel = yes".
"server schannel = auto" is very insecure and will be removed soon.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14497
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
We should debug more details about the failing request.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14497
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This should give admins wawrnings until they have a secure
configuration.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14497
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
This allows to add expections for individual workstations, when using "server schannel = yes".
"server schannel = auto" is very insecure and will be removed soon.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14497
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14497
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This implements the note from MS-NRPC 3.1.4.1 Session-Key Negotiation:
7. If none of the first 5 bytes of the client challenge is unique, the
server MUST fail session-key negotiation without further processing of
the following steps.
It lets ./zerologon_tester.py from
https://github.com/SecuraBV/CVE-2020-1472.git
report: "Attack failed. Target is probably patched."
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14497
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
[dbagnall@samba.org, abartlet@samba.org: wscript_build backport
differs because 4.10 has no gnutls dependency]
This is the check Windows is using, so we won't generate challenges,
which are rejected by Windows DCs (and future Samba DCs).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14497
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
It's good to have just a single isolated function that will generate
random challenges, in future we can add some logic in order to
avoid weak values, which are likely to be rejected by a server.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14497
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjoern Jacke <bjacke@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Martin Schwenke <martins@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jun 9 21:07:24 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
(cherry picked from commit ddac6b2eb4adaec8fc5e25ca07387d2b9417764c)
NSS_BUFLEN_PASSWD is not defined on FreeBSD. Use
sysconf(_SC_GETPW_R_SIZE_MAX) instead, as per POSIX.
Use a dynamically allocated buffer instead of trying to cram all of
the logic into the declarations. This will come in useful later
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjoern Jacke <bjacke@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 847208cd8ac68c4c7d1dae63767820db1c69292b)
It appears that snprintf(3) is being used for input validation.
However, this seems like overkill because it causes szPath to be
copied an extra time. The mostly likely protections being sought
here, according to https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html,
look to be DoS attacks involving CPU and memory usage. A simpler
check that uses strnlen(3) can mitigate against both of these and is
simpler.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjoern Jacke <bjacke@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 922bce2668994dd2a5988c17060f977e9bb0c229)
This is a security release in order to address the following CVEs:
o CVE-2020-10730: NULL pointer de-reference and use-after-free in Samba AD DC
LDAP Server with ASQ, VLV and paged_results.
o CVE-2020-10745: Parsing and packing of NBT and DNS packets can consume
excessive CPU.
o CVE-2020-10760: LDAP Use-after-free in Samba AD DC Global Catalog with
paged_results and VLV.
o CVE-2020-14303: Empty UDP packet DoS in Samba AD DC nbtd.
Signed-off-by: Karolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org>
This should avoid a regression.
(backported from master patch)
[abartlet@samba.org: sort=True parameter on test_paged_delete_during_search
is not in 4.10]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Otherwise a paged search on the GC port will fail as the ->data was
not kept around for the second page of searches.
An example command to produce this is
bin/ldbsearch --paged -H ldap://$SERVER:3268 -U$USERNAME%$PASSWORD
This shows up later in the partition module as:
ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x60b00151ef20 at pc 0x7fec3f801aac bp 0x7ffe8472c270 sp 0x7ffe8472c260
READ of size 4 at 0x60b00151ef20 thread T0 (ldap(0))
#0 0x7fec3f801aab in talloc_chunk_from_ptr ../../lib/talloc/talloc.c:526
#1 0x7fec3f801aab in __talloc_get_name ../../lib/talloc/talloc.c:1559
#2 0x7fec3f801aab in talloc_check_name ../../lib/talloc/talloc.c:1582
#3 0x7fec1b86b2e1 in partition_search ../../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c:780
or
smb_panic_default: PANIC (pid 13287): Bad talloc magic value - unknown value
(from source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c:780)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(backported from master commit)
[abartlet@samba.org: Remove f"" format string not supported in
Python 3.4]
NBT has a funny thing where it sometimes needs to send a trailing dot as
part of the last component, because the string representation is a user
name. In DNS, "example.com", and "example.com." are the same, both
having three components ("example", "com", ""); in NBT, we want to treat
them differently, with the second form having the three components
("example", "com.", "").
This retains the logic of e6e2ec0001fe3c010445e26cc0efddbc1f73416b.
Also DNS compression cannot be turned off for NBT.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14378
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
The empty subdomain component is reserved for the root domain, which we
should only (and always) see at the end of the list. That is, we expect
"example.com.", but never "example..com".
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14378
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This is because ndr_nbt.c does almost exactly the same thing with
almost exactly the same code, and they both do it wrong. Soon they
will both be using the better version that this will become. Though in
this patch we just move the code, not fix it.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14378
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
These time the push and pull function in isolation.
Timing should be under 0.0001 seconds on even quite old hardware; we
assert it must be under 0.2 seconds.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14378
(backported from master commit)
[abartlet@samba.org: backported due to differences in pre-existing
tests - eg test_ndr - mentioned in wscript_build and tests.py]
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
The client libraries don't allow us to make packets that are broken in
certain ways, so we need to construct them as byte strings.
These tests all fail at present, proving the server is rendered
unresponsive, which is the crux of CVE-2020-10745.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14378
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
(backported from patch for master)
[abartlet@samba.org: f"" strings are not in Python 3.4 and
bytes cannot be formatted in python 3.4]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Prevent use after free issues if ldb_lock_backend_callback is called
twice, usually due to ldb_module_done being called twice. This can happen if a
module ignores the return value from function a function that calls
ldb_module_done as part of it's error handling.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14364
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Check the return code from vlv_results, if it is not LDB_SUCCESS
ldb_module_done has already been called, and SHOULD NOT be called again.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14364
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Check the return code from paged_results, if it is not LDB_SUCCESS
ldb_module_done has already been called, and SHOULD NOT be called again.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14364
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This (two different paging controls) makes no sense and fails against
Windows Server 1709.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14364
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
The GUID is not returned in the DN for some reason in this (to be banned)
combination.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14364
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
As tested against Windows Server 1709
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14364
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
This is essentially an alternative patch, but without the correct
behaviour. Instead this just avoids a segfault.
Included in case we have something simialr again in
another module.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14364
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
This is a silly combination, but at least try and keep the results sensible
and avoid a double-dereference.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14364
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
The end result is the same, as sizeof() includes the trailing NUL, but this
avoids having to think about that.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14364
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
