IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This allows both errors (i.e. unhealthy) and warnings for different
thresholds. It replaces CTDB_CHECK_FS_USE.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Reviewed-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
Drop obvious comments. Use die() for less lines of code. Use a case
statement to avoid forking unnecessary processes for each filesystem
being checked. Drop parentheses around percentages in messages.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Reviewed-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
Will put all the system monitoring in here, simplifying 00.ctdb.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Reviewed-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11472
Signed-off-by: Ralph Wuerthner <ralph.wuerthner@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Aug 29 07:05:10 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
The uuid module was only built for Python 2.4 and lower, which Samba
no longer supports.
Python 2.5+ includes uuid in its standard library.
Signed-off-by: Petr Viktorin <pviktori@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Aug 29 04:03:49 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
Thanks to "L.P.H. van Belle" <belle@bazuin.nl>
for help in reproducing the issue.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11038
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Aug 28 22:03:31 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
This fixes the build on ubuntu 14.04, which failed like this:
[2852/3952] Compiling source3/smbd/smb2_create.c
../source3/smbd/smb2_create.c: In function ‘smbd_smb2_create_send’:
../source3/smbd/smb2_create.c:678:28: error: variable ‘svhdx’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
struct smb2_create_blob *svhdx = NULL;
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Also handle a review comment by Metze.
Signed-off-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ira Cooper <ira@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Aug 28 03:19:36 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
This can be used in order to optimize some parts later.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 27 23:23:54 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
- We avoid variables in order to do a lazy cleanup
in aes_ccm_128_digest() via ZERO_STRUCTP(ctx)
- We use the optimized aes_block_{xor,rshift}() functions
- Align AES_BLOCK_SIZE arrays to 8 bytes
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
- We avoid variables in order to do a lazy cleanup
in aes_ccm_128_digest() via ZERO_STRUCTP(ctx)
- We use the optimized aes_block_xor() function
- We reuse A_i instead of rebuilding it everything completely.
- Align AES_BLOCK_SIZE arrays to 8 bytes
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
- We avoid variables in order to do a lazy cleanup
in aes_cmac_128_final() via ZERO_STRUCTP(ctx)
- We avoid unused memcpy() calls
- We use the optimized aes_block_{xor,lshift}() functions
- Align AES_BLOCK_SIZE arrays to 8 bytes
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
These are typical operations on an AES_BLOCK used by different modes.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This should be an implementation detail in lib/crypto/aes.h.
In future we may add support for other implementations.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We marshall into a binary buffer, uint8_t better reflects that.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 27 00:40:58 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
sid_parse takes a binary blob, uint8_t reflects this a bit
better than char * does
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 25 21:45:18 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
This fixes a problem where is_myname() returns true if one of our names
is a substring of the specified name.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11427
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This ensures that the dbcheck rule fixes the sort order (and only fixes the sort order).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10973
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 25 02:45:58 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
This may assist if this needs to be changed again
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10973
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This allows us to know that the previous patches are correct.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10973
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Profiling on dbcheck have shown that we spend 10% of the time looking
for wellknown objects.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10973
Change-Id: I13ed58e8062d1b7b6179d17b0e7e56f943572c6c
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Patou <mat@matws.net>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Unknown attributeID values would cause an exception previously, and
unsorted attributes cause a failure to replicate with Samba 4.2.
In commit 61b978872f we started
to sort these values correctly, but previous versions of Samba
did not sort them correctly (we sorted high-bit-set values as
negative), and then after 9c9df40220
we stoped accepting these.
To ensure we are allowed to make this unusual change to the
replPropertyMetaData, a new OID is allocated and checked
for in repl_meta_data.c
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10973
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
We do not write network services in Python, so this is not a security issue, but would cause
a crash or other odd behaviour if the length was changed
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11430
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
The high bit may be set in these integers, so we need an unsigned int to store it in
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11429
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This also documents an issue with our python bindings and lists, as changes to integers in a list
of integers are not preserved
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11429
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
In particular, it is critical that we use unsigned integers of
sufficient size in python for unsigned C integers, and it is
critical that we check for overflow at both the python and C
level.
Otherwise, we may both represent and sort these incorrectly,
in particular when sorting attributeID values from DRSUAPI
which are represented as an signed enum in C and a uint32_t in IDL,
but which often has the high bit set (in schema extensions).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11429
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This will fail once our python bindings correctly check value ranges
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11429
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
