IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This allows to verify the backup tarball contents with:
sha256sum -c SHA256SUM
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We also have ldapi, other sockets or pipes around, we don't want to
add. This will be relevant for adding checksums later.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This demonstrates that access_denied is only generated if the client
really generates a change in the database.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13019
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Also test using the additional record in the answers section.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13019
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This will allow tests to backup the whole state
and mix them.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13019
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
It's possible to put the additional into the answers section,
so we should be able to test that.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13019
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Failed DNS updates just echo the request flaged as response,
all other elements are unchanged.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13019
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
With socket_wrapper we only get 1500 byte chunks...
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13019
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We just destroy the signature bytes but keep the header unchanged.
This makes it easier to look at it in wireshark.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13019
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If this test happens to be run in the five minute window prior to the
next ten‐hour GKDI interval — about once every one hundred and twenty
runs — the ‘current’ password requested from LDAP will actually be the
future password, which won’t match what’s in the database.
Instead of taking the password from LDAP, calculate it ourselves with
expected_gmsa_password_blob().
[330(7038)/334 at 43m51s] samba.tests.krb5.gmsa_tests(ad_dc:local)
UNEXPECTED(failure): samba.tests.krb5.gmsa_tests.samba.tests.krb5.gmsa_tests.GmsaTests.test_retrieving_managed_password_triggers_keys_update(ad_dc:local)
REASON: Exception: Exception: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/builds/samba-testbase/samba-def-build/bin/python/samba/tests/krb5/gmsa_tests.py", line 1091, in test_retrieving_managed_password_triggers_keys_update
self.assertEqual(creds.get_nt_hash(), nt_hash)
AssertionError: b'\xcf[\xe8:\xc7-\xd4V\xce\t\xfc\xcd\x06.T\x8a' != b'c\xc5\x97k\x17"G\x1e\x81>\xacV\x9d.*\x14'
Signed-off-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jun 4 20:52:09 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
With the source3/ based clilist.c, we can't test all infolevels where
this matters (see callers of get_dirent_ea_size()). But porting the
source4 based all-infolevel search code into source3/libsmb or doing
this one the reparse point test in the source4 infrastructure to me
seems like a lot of effort for moderate gain.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This removes the last dependency on ‘self’ in this method.
Signed-off-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
By default we also export on the old and older passwords...
In order to do a kinit with a keytab it might we useful to
include only the current keys.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
A lot of these tests are going to start failing, so skip them until
we’ve implemented the corresponding behaviour for the KDC.
Signed-off-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We just want to test whether a gMSA can use netlogon.
Signed-off-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This allows us to replace a call to
expected_current_gmsa_password_blob() with one to
expected_gmsa_password_blob(), a method which allows us to specify the
exact key we expect.
Signed-off-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
‘account_name’ and ‘server_name’ are passed in the wrong order. While
Samba ignores the account name parameter and doesn’t have a problem with
it missing its trailing dollar, Windows checks it and requires the
trailing dollar to be present.
Signed-off-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Filipenský <pfilipensky@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Pavel Filipensky <pfilipensky@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue May 14 13:37:53 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
This test is useless and won't work anymore in future.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This argument is actually an instance of SamDB (which inherits from Ldb).
This should have been called samdb.
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This expects PermissionError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted,
but it seems that setxattr() for security.NTACL works on gitlab
runners without being root.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We were mistakenly asserting something that did not happen with
Windows, because Samba already won't parse the DN string.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10763
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
9 hex-digit subauths like '0xABCDef123' will not fit in 32 bits, so
should be rejected on parsing.
In other situations, such as defaultSecurityDescriptor, overflowing
SID subauths on Windows will saturate to 0xffffffff, resulting in a
valid but probably meaningless SID. It is possible that in previous
testing we saw that here, but it is more likely I got confused. In any
case, now I see them being rejected, and that is good.
The saturating defaultSecurityDescriptor case is tested in
SidStringBehavioursThatWindowsAllows.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10763
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
And so should we.
Right now, these tests won't pass against Windows because they rely on
ldb pre-parsing of the SIDs, so they fail before Windows gets to see
them. Running them against Windows looks something like this, BTW:
SAMBA_SID_STRINGS_SKIP_LOCAL=1 \
SMB_CONF_PATH=st/ad_dc/etc/smb.conf \
PYTHONPATH=bin/default/python \
DC_SERVER=192.168.122.126 \
DC_USERNAME=Administrator DC_PASSWORD='xxx' \
python3 python/samba/tests/sid_strings.py
When things are right, the only failing tests should be from the
SidStringBehavioursThatSambaPrefers suite.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10763
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
It seems as if the well-known SID S-1-5-32-579
(DOMAIN_ALIAS_RID_ACCESS_CONTROL_ASSISTANCE_OPS) is
not always present -- specifically, it was not there on the
Windows machine used to develop these tests, but it is there on
the one I am now using.
S-1-5-32-545 (DOMAIN_ALIAS_RID_USERS) is surely going to exist,
so we use that instead.
That changes some of the assertions, making some NO_SUCH_OBJECTs
into successes.
For these tests we are only interested in the parsing of the SIDs, not
their meaning, so it's OK to change it.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10763
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15636
Signed-off-by: Anna Popova <popova.anna235@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Apr 24 06:20:58 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
ldap server require strong auth = allow_sasl_over_tls
is now an alias for 'allow_sasl_without_tls_channel_bindings'
and should be avoided and changed to 'yes' or
'allow_sasl_without_tls_channel_bindings'.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15621
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jo Sutton <jsutton@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Apr 21 23:17:53 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15633
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Apr 17 19:32:11 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
Once we have a gMSA server side the impact of deleting root keys becomes real
and so we must do this in a quiet place where it can not impact on other things.
Likewise, we want the samba.tests.dsdb_quiet_provision_tests tests to run
somewhere that is not doing other things, so we can see what a bare provision
will do. We must not allow test ordering inside the file to cause tests that
create root keys to run before checking if provision created a usable root key.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
- from_dict DN use-after-free
- check for the same directly creating the ldb.Message
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
We need to do this when the dn is on a message from another ldb.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
LDB is soon going to object strongly to Python DNs that don't come from
the ldb that they are being used with, for memory safety reasons.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The code previously read the uninitialised stack not the parsed
structure, and so could segfault if the stack was not zero.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Apr 9 23:59:54 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
random should not be used to create secure random numbers for tokens.
The secrets module is exactly for this.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This is already in MODELS which is populated in ModelMeta
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Apr 8 04:07:22 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
And add a known fail because there is a bug :-(
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This would only happen if the test failed (but the message would be
incorrect as 'e' the exception to be stringified doesn't exist.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This will give better output on failure as it compares strings instead
of bytes.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We want to use the PAC returned NT hash in the UF_SMARTCARD_REQUIRED case
as it will usually be random bytes so we can not just assert on the
value any more.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Currently (as of 2024-02) windows 21H2 returns this as [].
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
