IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
None of our test vectors are 18446744073709551615 bytes long, which
means we can know an `expected_length == returned_length` check will
catch the case where the compression function returns -1 for error. We
know that, but Coverity doesn't.
It's the same thing over and over again, in two different patterns:
>>> CID 1517301: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN)
>>> Calling "memcmp" with "original.data" and "original.length" is
suspicious because of the very large index, 18446744073709551615. The index
may be due to a negative parameter being interpreted as unsigned.
393 if (original.length != decomp_written ||
394 memcmp(decompressed.data,
395 original.data,
396 original.length) != 0) {
397 debug_message("\033[1;31mgot %zd, expected %zu\033[0m\n",
398 decomp_written,
*** CID 1517299: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN)
/lib/compression/tests/test_lzxpress_plain.c: 296 in
test_lzxpress_plain_decompress_more_compressed_files()
290 debug_start_timer();
291 written = lzxpress_decompress(p.compressed.data,
292 p.compressed.length,
293 dest,
294 p.decompressed.length);
295 debug_end_timer("decompress", p.decompressed.length);
>>> CID 1517299: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN)
>>> Calling "memcmp" with "p.decompressed.data" and
"p.decompressed.length" is suspicious because of the very large index,
18446744073709551615. The index may be due to a negative parameter being
interpreted as unsigned.
296 if (written == p.decompressed.length &&
297 memcmp(dest, p.decompressed.data, p.decompressed.length)
== 0) {
298 debug_message("\033[1;32mdecompressed %s!
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We know that code is non-zero, because it comes from the combination of
the intermediate representation and the symbol tables that were generated
at the same time. But Coverity doesn't know that, and it thinks we could
be doing undefined things in the subsequent shift.
CID 1517302: Integer handling issues (BAD_SHIFT)
In expression "1 << code_bit_len", shifting by a negative amount has
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The struct write_context bit_len attribute is always between 0 and 31,
but if the next patches are applied without this, SUSE GCC -O3 will
worry thusly:
../../lib/compression/lzxpress_huffman.c: In function
‘lzxpress_huffman_compress’:
../../lib/compression/lzxpress_huffman.c:953:5: error: assuming signed
overflow does not occur when simplifying conditional to constant
[-Werror=strict-overflow]
if (wc->bit_len > 16) {
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Inspection tell us that the invariant holds. Nevertheless, we can
safely use an unsigned type and insist that over- or under- flow is
bad.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The 'compressed' string can be about 9/8 the size of the decompressed
string, but we didn't allow enough memory in the fuzz target for that.
Then when it failed, we didn't check.
Credit to OSSFuzz.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We had
output[output_pos - distance];
where output_pos and distance are size_t and distance can be greater
than output_pos (because it refers to a place in the previous block).
The underflow is defined, leading to a big number, and when
sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(*uint8_t) the subsequent overflow works as
expected. But if size_t is smaller than a pointer, bad things will
happen.
This was found by OSSFuzz with
'UBSAN_OPTIONS=print_stacktrace=1:silence_unsigned_overflow=1'.
Credit to OSSFuzz.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
share_info.tdb has permissions of 0o600 and so we need
to become_root() prior to retrieving the security info.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15265
Signed-off-by: Andrew Walker <awalker@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Dec 19 20:41:15 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
It's good to have a consistent set of hash_size/flags for all aspects of
an open file handle. Currently we're using 4 databases:
smbXsrv_open_global.tdb, leases.tdb, locking.tdb and brlock.tdb.
While at it also crank up the hashsize if the smbXsrv_tcon and smbXsrv_session
TDBs. The default TDB hash size is insanely small and disk space is cheap these
days, by going with the much larger hash size we get O(1) lookup instead of O(n)
for moderate to large loads with a few thousand objects.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Dec 19 16:40:15 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Dec 16 21:35:45 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
Nobody looks at the out params anymore
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Dec 16 08:42:18 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
Now that fname is writable, we can avoid a bit of complexity with
clistr_smb2_extract_snapshot_token()
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Allows us to pass in path separator from a new function without
changing existing calling code.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
We're messing with this in 2 places in this routine and have to make a
copy in both places. Make this writable, so we don't have to make a
copy further down.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This also allows --without-winexe to stop building the .exe files even if
the compilers are present on the system.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15264
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Dec 16 07:41:38 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
The linker has to relocate the pointers in the array at startup, save
that. I know we have bigger .data blobs, but every bit counts :-)
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Dec 15 22:51:06 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
The linker has to relocate the pointers in the array at startup, save
that. I know we have bigger .data blobs, but every bit counts :-)
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We should never call this without the place to put the target in.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Master-only bug introduced with dd9cdfb3b1: smb2_dfs_share_path() can
change the length of fname, and if it happens that the original length
hits a \ in the enlarged filename, we cut it off.
Found by accident, this really made me scratch my head when looking at
traces :-)
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Don't do the get_real_filename() retry if we're in posix context of if
the connection is case sensitive.
The whole concept of case sensivity blows my brain. In SMB1 without
posix extensions it's a per-request thing. In SMB2 without posix
extensions this should just depend on "case sensitive = yes/no", and
in future SMB2 posix extensions this will become a per-request thing
again, depending on the existence of the posix create context.
Then there are other semantics that are attached to posix-ness, which
have nothing to do with case sensivity. See for example merge request
2819 and bug 8776, or commit f0e1137425. Also see
check_path_syntax_internal().
This patch uses the same flags as openat_pathref_fsp_case_insensitive()
does, but I am 100% certain this is wrong in a subtle way.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Dec 15 11:30:04 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Dec 14 23:56:50 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
This file must be readable by all users,
otherwise the policy doesn't get read or applied.
Signed-off-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
After I found that nobody calls stat_cache_add() anymore, there was no
reason to keep the rest of statcache.c.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Remove a global cache of calculating case sensivity. The calculation
is really simple: It only references a bool per-share parameter and a
global variable. I really doubt there is any measurable benefit from
this cache, and if there was, I don't care if SMB1 gets a tiny bit
slower in response to reduced global state.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We should not ignore the error nor should we map
GNUTLS_E_UNWANTED_ALGORITHM to NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD,
instead we use NT_STATUS_CRYPTO_SYSTEM_INVALID as in most other places
in the same file.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15206
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Björn Baumbach <bbaumbach@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Dec 14 13:35:20 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Dec 14 05:29:51 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
With the proper NULL checks we don't need the stackframe,
use a passed in context instead.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
