IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
If the child dies at the wrong moment, we get an error in the "req" itself.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13309
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Mar 1 14:48:19 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
Fix a bug when a child dies when a request is pending in the child. If the
signal handler fires before epoll finds out the other end of the parent-child
socket is closed, we close the socket on our side without taking care of the
pending request. This causes two problems: First, that one pending request
never is replied to properly, and secondly, we might end up with EPOLL_DEL on a
wrong file descriptor. This causes all sorts of trouble if we hit an active
one.
The fix for this problem is not to close the socket in winbind_child_died().
This however stops an idle child that dies hard from being properly cleaned up.
The fix for that is to add the child->monitor_fde that is set pending only when
no child request is active. This way we can remove the close(sock) in the
signal handler.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13309
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This removes the special handling for idmap_child() after the "This is
a little tricky" comment. I believe this was not required at all, the
idmap_child is part of the winbindd_children list.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13309
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Note that we only walk the domain children, which all have
child->domain != NULL. So we don't need that check anymore.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13309
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Look at setup_domain_child(): There we always set child->domain. The only other
two children are the idmap and locator children, which don't have a domain set.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13309
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Step 0 in removing winbindd_children as a variable: We have access to
all children via our domain list and the two explicit children. There's
no need to separately maintain a list of winbind children. Maintaining
child->pid != 0 is sufficient to make sure we only walk active children.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13309
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Timur I. Bakeyev <timur@iXsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
These tests are currently not run on Ubuntu due to bashisms in the test.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Mar 1 09:52:37 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
