IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This one still cheats and only returns one winbindd_pw structure per call.
Also, doesn't get a new libnet_UserList yet.
(This used to be commit e1b93be1e1)
the difference between these at all, and in the future the
fact that INIT_OBJ_FILES include smb_build.h will be sufficient to
have recompiles at the right time.
(This used to be commit b24f2583ed)
support cldap and other stuff in the future.
This temporarily disables wbinfo -t, but that will come back soon.
Try an ldap bind using gss-spnego. This got me krb5 binds against "our" w2k3
and a trusted w2k, although with some memleaks from krb5 and a BAD_OPTION
tgs-rep error.
Volker
(This used to be commit d14948fdf6)
--user-sids required the extension to trusted domains.
Implement "winbind sealed pipes" parameter for debugging purposes.
Volker
(This used to be commit 3821a17bdb)
Tridge, if you have the time, you might want to look at a problem I'm having
with unix domain stream sockets. From a comment in this commit:
/* Using composite_trigger_error here causes problems with the client
* socket. Linux 2.6.8 gives me a ECONNRESET on the next read after
* writing the reply when I don't wait the 100 milliseconds. */
This is in winbind/wb_cmd_userdomgroups.c:93.
The problem I have is that I can not *immediately* send an error reply to the
client because the next receive fails. Waiting 100 milliseconds helps. It
might also be a problem with epoll(), I don't really know.
I'd appreciate if you took a brief look at this, maybe I'm doing something
wrong.
Thanks,
Volker
(This used to be commit 3e535cce74)
but the version before did not either, so we're not worse than before.
One thing this does better is to call the domain init code if it's not there
yet.
Volker
(This used to be commit 35bcfb185b)
* rename the composite helper functions from comp_* to composite_*
* Move the lsa initialization to wb_connect_lsa.c
* Equip smb_composite_connect with a fallback_to_anonymous
The latter two simplify wb_init_domain.c quite a bit.
Volker
(This used to be commit deb127e04e)
Initialize a domain structure properly. Excerpt from wb_init_domain.c:
/*
* Initialize a domain:
*
* - With schannel credentials, try to open the SMB connection with the machine
* creds. Fall back to anonymous.
*
* - If we have schannel creds, do the auth2 and open the schannel'ed netlogon
* pipe.
*
* - Open LSA. If we have machine creds, try to open with ntlmssp. Fall back
* to schannel and then to anon bind.
*
* - With queryinfopolicy, verify that we're talking to the right domain
*
* A bit complex, but with all the combinations I think it's the best we can
* get. NT4, W2k3SP1 and W2k all have different combinations, but in the end we
* have a signed&sealed lsa connection on all of them.
*
* Is this overkill? In particular the authenticated SMB connection seems a
* bit overkill, given that we do schannel for netlogon and ntlmssp for
* lsa later on w2k3, the others don't do this anyway.
*/
Thanks to Jeremy for his detective work, and to the Samba4 team for providing
such a great infrastructure.
Next step is to connect to SAM. Do it via LDAP if we can, fall back to samr
with all we have.
Volker
(This used to be commit 3e69fdc07c)
queryinfopolicy. Idea is to get a consistency check between that and our
notion of the domain name and sid, and take the lsa pipe as the holder of the
central smbcli_tree that netlogon and samr use as well.
Volker
(This used to be commit 126c80aefc)
domain and gets the DC's name via a mailslot call.
Metze, I renamed wbsrv_queue_reply to wbsrv_send_reply in accordance with
irpc_send_reply. Having _queue_ here and _send_ there is a bit confusing. And
as everything is async anyway, the semantics should not be too much of a
problem.
Volker
(This used to be commit 4637964b19)
- remove the echo test stuff
- abstract out the used protocol
- we have a seperate handler for the samba3 protocol now
- the backend can easy do async replies
by setting WBSRV_CALL_FLAGS_REPLY_ASYNC in wbsrv_call
and then call wbsrv_queue_reply() later
metze
(This used to be commit 32f3e68a56)
- this creates a new task and then starts a process_model "single"
with service "winbind_task"
- that means with -M single everything is in one process
with - M standard winbind is a seperate process but didn't fork for each connection
with -M thread winbind is a seperate thread but didn't thread for each connection
- the dummy server listen s on /tmp/.winbind/echo
and for better testing with telnet also on 127.0.255.1 port 55555
metze
(This used to be commit 5190f60ded)
