IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
It is always better to keep the testing OUs unique if possible.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This object is used to hold one of many possible connections and
it is helpful for debugging and uniqueness to know which DC is being
connected to.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This check was valuable before aee2039e63
but now only checks things we know to be true, as the value has come
from Samba via drs_ObjectIdentifier_to_dn_and_nc_root() either on this
or a previous call.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
At this layer we can make a reasonable assumption about being able
to read ldb_errstring() to print that for extra useful debugging.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This is still unreachable, so but improve the logging
to give more detail in this area anyway.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
If we hit a reparse point in point, it might be something but a
symlink.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 10 14:36:40 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
Eventually we'll have to make STOPPED_ON_SYMLINK special to handle the
symlink response, but for now they are the same.
STOPPED_ON_SYMLINK will tell us where the symlink is,
REPARSE_TAG_NOT_HANDLED won't. So if there's an unhandled reparse
point somewhere in the path, there's no really good way to handle
this. We'll get the REPARSE_TAG_NOT_HANDLED the second time as
well. Even SMB1 QPATHINFO gets this when you try to cross a NFS
reparse point.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Will be used in smbclient's allinfo command: Reparse points are more
than just symlinks.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The goal of this is to eventually remove reparse_symlink.c once we
have marshalling routines for symlinks in reparse.c
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Remove the last direct caller of symlink_reparse_buffer_parse()
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
When we retrieve reparse point data, we don't know before what we
get. Right now all we do is expect a symlink, but we could get other
types as well.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
If you run "allinfo" on a symlink with NT1, cli_readlink_send sends a
NULL "in" blob. Do the same as smb2cli_ioctl_send() does, just send
NULL/0 in that case and don't crash.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
If a client opens multiple connection with the same
client guid in parallel, our connection passing is likely
to hit a race.
Assume we have 3 processes:
smbdA: This process already handles all connections for
a given client guid
smbdB: This just received a new connection with an
SMB2 neprot for the same client guid
smbdC: This also received a new connection with an
SMB2 neprot for the same client guid
Now both smbdB and smbdC send a MSG_SMBXSRV_CONNECTION_PASS
message to smbdA. These messages contain the socket fd
for each connection.
While waiting for a MSG_SMBXSRV_CONNECTION_PASSED message
from smbdA, both smbdB and smbdC watch the smbXcli_client.tdb
record for changes (that also verifies smbdA stays alive).
Once one of them say smbdB received the MSG_SMBXSRV_CONNECTION_PASSED
message, the dbwrap_watch logic will wakeup smbdC in order to
let it recheck the smbXcli_client.tdb record in order to
handle the case where smbdA died or deleted its record.
Now smbdC rechecks the smbXcli_client.tdb record, but it
was not woken because of a problem with smbdA. It meant
that smbdC sends a MSG_SMBXSRV_CONNECTION_PASS message
including the socket fd again.
As a result smbdA got the socket fd from smbdC twice (or even more),
and creates two (or more) smbXsrv_connection structures for the
same low level tcp connection. And it also sends more than one
SMB2 negprot response. Depending on the tevent logic, it will
use different smbXsrv_connection structures to process incoming
requests. And this will almost immediately result in errors.
The typicall error is:
smb2_validate_sequence_number: smb2_validate_sequence_number: bad message_id 2 (sequence id 2) (granted = 1, low = 1, range = 1)
But other errors would also be possible.
The detail that leads to the long delays on the client side is
that our smbd_server_connection_terminate_ex() code will close
only the fd of a single smbXsrv_connection, but the refcount
on the socket fd in the kernel is still not 0, so the tcp
connection is still alive...
Now we remember the server_id of the process that we send
the MSG_SMBXSRV_CONNECTION_PASS message to. And just keep
watching the smbXcli_client.tdb record if the server_id
don't change. As we just need more patience to wait for
the MSG_SMBXSRV_CONNECTION_PASSED message.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15346
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 8 13:59:58 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
Commit 5d66d5b84f introduced a
'verify_again:' target, if we ever hit that, we would leak
the existing filter_subreq.
Moving it just above a possible messaging_filtered_read_send()
will allow us to only clear it if we actually create a new
request. That will help us in the next commits.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15346
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This demonstrates the race quite easily against
Samba and works fine against Windows Server 2022.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15346
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
It seems commit 259129e8f4 was partly just
fantasy...
Windows clients just use 16 bytes for DCERPC_PKT_CO_CANCEL and
DCERPC_PKT_ORPHANED pdus.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15446
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 8 08:57:46 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
DCERPC_PKT_CO_CANCEL and DCERPC_PKT_ORPHANED don't have any payload by
default. In order to receive them via dcerpc_read_ncacn_packet_send/recv
we need to allow fragments with frag_len == DCERPC_NCACN_PAYLOAD_OFFSET.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15446
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
The PDUs were generated by Windows clients.
And we fail to parse them currently.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15446
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Otherwise we getthis kind of thing:
../../lib/replace/replace.c:837:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'strlcpy' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
strlcpy(buf, s, buflen);
../../third_party/heimdal/lib/roken/getarg.c:288:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'strlcat' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
strlcat(buf, "]", sizeof(buf));
because we found the symbol names in libc, but didn't check that the
functions are declared in <string.h>. We already include
<bsd/string.h> whenever we have it.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 8 05:35:08 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
We were wanting to ensure the string contains a zero byte, but
instead were checking for a non-zero byte.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We have been using `uint8_t *`, which works fine as far as
linking goes, but leads fuzz target developers to sometimes
forget why they can't just modify the passed in string instead of
copying it for modification (e.g. to NUL-terminate).
REF: https://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html#fuzz-target
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Allocate these objects on a shorter-lived memory context.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
