IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This uses the code from the source4/ SMB server (the NTVFS smb server)
in common, to force SMB Signing to be on when we are an AD DC.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Nov 22 13:13:05 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
use <sys/stat.h> instead of forward declaring it
This fixes the build on AIX
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10276
Signed-off-by: Christian Ambach <ambi@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Christian Ambach <ambi@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Nov 21 22:12:45 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
This fixes bsd_attr_list() calling geteuid().
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Nov 21 03:37:59 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10269
These macros might have worked but they break strict aliasing in the
meantime and so the compiler is not able to optimize the relevant code.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Nov 14 23:16:45 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
Thanks to Stefan Rompf for reporting.
This fixes bug #10247
Signed-off-by: Bjoern Jacke <bj@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Nov 8 20:43:30 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
Not called right now, because nobody tries multiple sort attributes. But if
someone did, build_response would have looked at the uninitialized controls.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 22 03:28:20 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Oct 16 11:39:41 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
This allows us to use more lpcfg_ functions without adding them
manually.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This allows us not to generate array entries for these, which in turn allows
us to avoid initialising them. The issue is that we do not have the
% macro sub context nor a talloc context handy (yet).
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This was found when trying to autogenerate prototypes for lp_ functions again.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Kai Blin <kai@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Oct 14 23:05:54 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
On talloc_realloc failure, asn1_write calls talloc_free on an asn1_data
pointer and then tries to immediately set the has_error flag on it.
Skip the free and just set the has_error flag.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Oct 14 16:54:35 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
This fixes a GCC warning.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Oct 11 18:05:19 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
This is what Windows 2008 R2 returns:
LDB_MOD_ADD => LDB_ERR_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM
LDB_MOD_REPLACE => LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION
LDB_MOD_DEL => LDB_ERR_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 8 17:32:59 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
Instead of referencing the values array of the element to the new element, copy them, to
avoid use of talloc_reference and remove a warning of talloc_steal with reference.
The issue is only relevant when openldap backend is used.
Signed-off-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Like LDB_MAP_RENAME, but drop the attribute if it occurs in an Add request.
Used for distinguishedName attribute, is read-only and generated but for
some bizarre reason AD allows it in an Add request.
Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Reviewed-by: Simo Sorce <idra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Sep 19 01:42:43 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
-1 was never a valid LDB return code, just use OPERATIONS_ERROR
Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 17 07:51:45 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
This is so we do not search for @REPLCHANGED against ldap
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Cleanup leftover include and linking of libldb-cmdline in
oLschema2ldif. Do not build libldb-cmdline anymore when using the
system ldb, oLschema2ldif was the only reason for building
libldb-cmdline.
Signed-off-by: Jeroen Dekkers <jeroen@dekkers.ch>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 10 12:52:26 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
This is necessary to allow talloc pools to be objects on their own. It
is an incompatible change in the sense that talloc_get_size(pool) now
returns 0 instead of the pool size. When the talloc_pooled_object()
call is added, this will start to make sense again.
Maybe we should add a talloc_pool_size call? Or is that overkill?
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This is a preparation to make talloc pool real objects themselves.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This will allow to exchange the extra talloc pool header with the
talloc_chunk structure
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
If we want nested pools, we will have pools that are pool members. So
we will have to have a separate "next object" pointer for pools. As
we have struct talloc_pool_chunk now, this additional pointer does not
affect normal talloc objects.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
bin/smbtorture //127.0.0.1 local.talloc now runs with no valgrind errors.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: "Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Aug 28 02:44:17 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
Replace the last use of talloc_memlimit_update() with talloc_memlimit_grow()/
talloc_memlimit_shrink().
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Simo Sorce <idra@samba.org>
Don't check the memlimit if the allocation was successful from a pool. We already
checked the memory limit when we created the pool.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Simo Sorce <idra@samba.org>
