IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The chgdcpass environment will emulate older verions of Samba
that fail to implement DRSUAPI_DRS_GET_ANC correctly and
totally fails to support DRSUAPI_DRS_GET_TGT.
This will allow testing of a client-side fallback, allowing migration
from sites that run very old Samba versions over DRSUAPI (currently
the only option is to attempt an in-place upgrade).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15189
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Uses non-DFS names and DFS-names against a DFS share, shows that Windows
looks correctly at the DFS flag when SMB2 requests are
made on a DFS share. Passes against Windows 2022.
Mark as knownfail for smbd.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 28 19:34:29 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
Test using non-priviledged accounts now need to make sure they have
WP access on the prvided attributes, or Write-DACL
Some test create organizational units with a specific SD, and those now
need the user to have WD or else they give errors
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Up to now, the rights to modify an attribute were not checked during an LDAP
add operation. This means that even if a user has no right to modify
an attribute, they can still specify any value during object creation,
and the validated writes were not checked.
This patch changes this behavior. During an add operation,
a security descriptor is created that does not include the one provided by the
user, and is used to verify that the user has the right to modify the supplied attributes.
Exception is made for an object's mandatory attributes, and if the user has Write DACL right,
further checks are skipped.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Pair-Programmed-With: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Up to now, the rights to modify an attribute were not checked during an LDAP
add operation. This means that even if a user has no right to modify
an attribute, they can still specify any value during object creation,
and the validated writes were not checked.
This patch includes tests for the proposed change of behavior.
test_add_c3 and c4 pass, because mandatory attributes can still be
set, and in the old behavior SD permissions were irrelevant
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Pair-Programmed-With: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Only tests SMB1unlink for now, but I will add other operations
later.
smbtorture3 test is: SMB1-DFS-OPERATIONS.
Passes fully against Windows. Adds knownfail for smbd.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
This one is tricky. It sends SMB2 DFS pathnames to a non-DFS
share, and sets the SMB2 flag FLAGS2_DFS_PATHNAMES in the SMB2
packet.
Windows will have non of it and (correctly) treats the pathnames
as local paths (they're going to a non-DFS share). Samba fails.
This proves the server looks as the share DFS capability to
override the flag in the SMB2 packet.
Passes against Windows. Added knownfail for Samba.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
These variables are not important to protect against a race with
and a double-read can easily be avoided by moving them up the file
a little.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Ensure that the bad password count is incremented atomically,
and that the successful logon accounting data is updated atomically.
Use bad password indicator (in a distinct TDB) to determine if to open a transaction
We open a transaction when we have seen the hint that this user
has recorded a bad password. This allows us to avoid always
needing one, while not missing a possible lockout.
We also go back and get a transation if we did not take out
one out but we chose to do a write (eg for lastLogonTimestamp)
Based on patches by Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
cmocka unit tests for the authsam_reread_user_logon_data in
source4/auth/sam.c
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14937
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Douglas Bagnall <dbagnall@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 7 06:02:20 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
Most likely it is a bad filename or attribute, not the wrong type of
argument.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14937
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Not TypeError, which is supposed to be about Python data types. This
way we get to check/see an errno and strerror, and will allow us to
set the filename which will be useful for some errors.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We want `samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset` and `samba-tool ntacl
sysvolcheck` to fail when the Policies folder is not in place, but not
to produce an inscrutable stacktrace.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14937
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
To match convention, and elsewhere.
We can't easily use colour.is_colour_wanted() because we could (via
--output) be intending to write to a file that isn't open yet, so we
have no .isatty() to query.
Also, because --color-scheme implies --color (as documented in
--help), it trumps most 'auto' checks, but not NO_COLOR.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
By convention, 'tty' is a common alias for 'auto', 'always' and
'force' mean 'yes', and 'never' means no. It seems 'never; and
'always' are more common than 'yes' and 'no'.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
As described at https://no-color.org/, the NO_COLOR environment
variable is a widely used defacto-ish standard for asking for no
colour. If someone goes
NO_COLOR=whatever samba-tool ...
we want to assume they want no ANSI colour codes, as if they had used
--color=no. But first we want to test that, so here we are.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
If a client disconnected all its interfaces and reconnects when
the come back, it will likely start from any ip address returned
dns, which means it can try to connect to a different ctdb node.
The old node may not have noticed the disconnect and still holds
the client_guid based smbd.
Up unil now the new node returned NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED to
the SMB2 Negotiate request, as messaging_send_iov[_from]() will
return -1/ENOSYS if a file descriptor os passed to a process on
a different node.
Now we tell the other node to teardown all client connections
belonging to the client-guid.
Note that this is not authenticated, but if an attacker can
capture the client-guid, he can also inject TCP resets anyway,
to get the same effect.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15159
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 2 20:59:15 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
This demonstrates that a client-guid connected to ctdb node 0
caused a connection with the same client-guid to be rejected by
ctdb node 1. Node 1 rejects the SMB2 Negotiate with
NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED, because passing the multi-channel connection
to a different node is not supported.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15159
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
smbtorture3 test is: SMB1-DFS-PATHS
Tests open, and then all 4 methods of renaming/hardlinking
files:
1). SMBmv
2). SMBtrans2 SETPATHINFO
3). SMBtrans2 SETFILEINFO
4). SMBntrename
Also added a test for SMB1findfirst.
smbtorture3 test is: SMB1-DFS-SEARCH-PATHS.
What this shows is that Windows strips off the
SMB1findfirst mask *before* calling the DFS path
parser (smbd currently does not).
Added so we know how to fix the server code to match Windows
behavior in parsing DFS paths in different calls going forward.
Passes fully against Windows. Adds knownfails for smbd.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Passes fully against Windows.
This shows that DFS paths on Windows on SMB2 must
be of the form:
SERVER\SHARE\PATH
but the actual contents of the strings SERVER and
SHARE don't need to match the given server or share.
The algorithm the Windows server uses is the following:
Look for a '\\' character, and assign anything before
that to the SERVER component. The characters in this
component are not checked for validity.
Look for a second '\\' character and assign anything
between the first and second '\\' characters to the
SHARE component. The characters in the share component
are checked for validity, but only ':' is flagged as
an illegal sharename character despite what:
[MS-FSCC] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-fscc/dc9978d7-6299-4c5a-a22d-a039cdc716ea
says.
Anything after the second '\\' character is assigned
to the PATH component and becomes the share-relative
path.
If there aren't two '\\' characters it removes
everything and ends up with the empty string as
the share relative path.
To give some examples, the following pathnames all map
to the directory at the root of the DFS share:
SERVER\SHARE
SERVER
""
ANY\NAME
ANY
::::\NAME
the name:
SERVER\:
is illegal (sharename contains ':') and the name:
ANY\NAME\file
maps to a share-relative pathname of "file",
despite "ANY" not being the server name, and
"NAME" not being the DFS share name we are
connected to.
Adds a knownfail for smbd as our current code
in parse_dfs_path() is completely incorrect
here and tries to map "incorrect" DFS names
into local paths. I will work on fixing this
later, but we should be able to remove parse_dfs_path()
entirely and move the DFS pathname logic before
the call to filename_convert_dirfsp() in the
same way Volker suggested and was able to achieve
for extract_snapshot_token() and the @GMT pathname
processing.
Also proves the "target" paths for SMB2_SETINFO
rename and hardlink must *not* be DFS-paths.
Next I will work on a torture tester for SMB1
DFS paths.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reivewed-by: Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 30 17:10:33 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14215
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Aug 29 18:20:20 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
Passes against Windows, currently fails against Samba.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14215
RN: Requesting maximum allowed permission of file with DOS read-only attribute results in access denied error
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The spec lists the following as requiring special access:
- for requiring FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES:
FileBasicInformation
FileAllInformation
FileNetworkOpenInformation
FileAttributeTagInformation
- for requiring FILE_READ_EA:
FileFullEaInformation
All other infolevels are unrestricted.
We ignore the IPC related infolevels:
FilePipeInformation
FilePipeLocalInformation
FilePipeRemoteInformation
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15153
RN: Missing SMB2-GETINFO access checks from MS-SMB2 3.3.5.20.1
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 23 12:54:08 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
Commit d71ef1365cdde47aeb3465699181656b0655fa04 caused a regression where the
creation date on streams wasn't updated anymore on the stream fsp.
By adding a simple wrapper vfs_fget_dos_attributes() that takes care of
- passing only the base_fsp to the VFS, so the VFS can be completely agnostic of
all the streams related complexity like fake fds,
- propagating any updated btime from the base_fsp->fsp_name to the
stream_fsp->fsp_name
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15126
MR: https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/-/merge_requests/2643
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
If contend_level2_oplocks_begin_default() skips break it's
own lease, we should not clear SHARE_MODE_LEASE_READ
in share_mode_data->flags.
Otherwise that lease won't see any lease break notifications
for writes from other clients (file handles not using the same lease
key).
So we need to count the number existing read leases (including
the one with the same lease key) in order to know it's
safe to clear SMB2_LEASE_READ/SHARE_MODE_LEASE_READ.
Otherwise the next run (likely from another client)
will get the wrong result from file_has_read_lease().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15148
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 18 19:41:33 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
This demonstrates the bug that happens with a
write to a file handle holding an R lease,
while there are other openers without any lease.
When one of the other openers writes to the file,
the R lease of the only lease holder isn't broken to NONE.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15148
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Returns NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND for final component.
Note we have to call the check before each call to
openat_pathref_fsp(), as each call may be using a
different filesystem name. The first name is the
one passed into openat_pathref_fsp_case_insensitive()
by the caller, the second one is a name retrieved from
get_real_filename_cache_key(), and the third one is the name
retrieved from get_real_filename_at(). The last two
calls may have demangled the client given name into
a veto'ed path on the filesystem.
Remove knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15143
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 16 08:26:54 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
Shows we currently don't look at smb.conf veto files parameter
when opening a file or directory. Checks multi-component paths.
Also checks veto files that might be hidden behind a mangled
name.
Add knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15143
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
When using vfs_streams_xattr, for a pathref handle of a stream the system fd
will be a fake fd created by pipe() in vfs_fake_fd().
For the following callchain we wrongly pass a stream fsp to
SMB_VFS_FGET_NT_ACL():
SMB_VFS_CREATE_FILE(..., "file:stream", ...)
=> open_file():
if (open_fd):
-> taking the else branch:
-> smbd_check_access_rights_fsp(stream_fsp)
-> SMB_VFS_FGET_NT_ACL(stream_fsp)
This is obviously wrong and can lead to strange permission errors when using
vfs_acl_xattr:
in vfs_acl_xattr we will try to read the stored ACL by calling
fgetxattr(fake-fd) which of course faild with EBADF. Now unfortunately the
vfs_acl_xattr code ignores the specific error and handles this as if there was
no ACL stored and subsequently runs the code to synthesize a default ACL
according to the setting of "acl:default acl style".
As the correct access check for streams has already been carried out by calling
check_base_file_access() from create_file_unixpath(), the above problem is not
a security issue: it can only lead to "decreased" permissions resulting in
unexpected ACCESS_DENIED errors.
The fix is obviously going to be calling
smbd_check_access_rights_fsp(stream_fsp->base_fsp).
This test verifies that deleting a file works when the stored NT ACL grants
DELETE_FILE while the basic POSIX permissions (used in the acl_xattr fallback
code) do not.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15126
MR: https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/-/merge_requests/2643
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
If the message changes the sAMAccountName, we'll check dNSHostName and
servicePrincipalName values against the new value of sAMAccountName,
rather than the account's current value. Similarly, if the message
changes the dNSHostName, we'll check servicePrincipalName values against
the new dNSHostName. This allows setting more than one of these
attributes simultaneously with validated write rights.
We now pass 'struct ldb_val' to acl_validate_spn_value() instead of
simple strings. Previously, we were relying on the data inside 'struct
ldb_val' having a terminating zero byte, even though this is not
guaranteed.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14833
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This allows us to perform validation on a client-specified dNSHostName
value, to ensure that it matches the sAMAccountName.
We might not have any rights to modify the account, so pass the control
FORCE_ALLOW_VALIDATED_DNS_HOSTNAME_SPN_WRITE which allows us to perform
a validated write to dNSHostName and servicePrincipalName (and
unvalidated writes to other attributes, such as operatingSystem).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14833
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Even when there is no old DNS hostname present.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14833
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This check is not exhaustive (it does not check the suffix of the
dNSHostName), and should be covered by a validated write check in
acl_modify().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14833
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Test that the value is properly validated, and that it can be set
regardless of rights on the account.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14833
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
