IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
If a client opens multiple connection with the same
client guid in parallel, our connection passing is likely
to hit a race.
Assume we have 3 processes:
smbdA: This process already handles all connections for
a given client guid
smbdB: This just received a new connection with an
SMB2 neprot for the same client guid
smbdC: This also received a new connection with an
SMB2 neprot for the same client guid
Now both smbdB and smbdC send a MSG_SMBXSRV_CONNECTION_PASS
message to smbdA. These messages contain the socket fd
for each connection.
While waiting for a MSG_SMBXSRV_CONNECTION_PASSED message
from smbdA, both smbdB and smbdC watch the smbXcli_client.tdb
record for changes (that also verifies smbdA stays alive).
Once one of them say smbdB received the MSG_SMBXSRV_CONNECTION_PASSED
message, the dbwrap_watch logic will wakeup smbdC in order to
let it recheck the smbXcli_client.tdb record in order to
handle the case where smbdA died or deleted its record.
Now smbdC rechecks the smbXcli_client.tdb record, but it
was not woken because of a problem with smbdA. It meant
that smbdC sends a MSG_SMBXSRV_CONNECTION_PASS message
including the socket fd again.
As a result smbdA got the socket fd from smbdC twice (or even more),
and creates two (or more) smbXsrv_connection structures for the
same low level tcp connection. And it also sends more than one
SMB2 negprot response. Depending on the tevent logic, it will
use different smbXsrv_connection structures to process incoming
requests. And this will almost immediately result in errors.
The typicall error is:
smb2_validate_sequence_number: smb2_validate_sequence_number: bad message_id 2 (sequence id 2) (granted = 1, low = 1, range = 1)
But other errors would also be possible.
The detail that leads to the long delays on the client side is
that our smbd_server_connection_terminate_ex() code will close
only the fd of a single smbXsrv_connection, but the refcount
on the socket fd in the kernel is still not 0, so the tcp
connection is still alive...
Now we remember the server_id of the process that we send
the MSG_SMBXSRV_CONNECTION_PASS message to. And just keep
watching the smbXcli_client.tdb record if the server_id
don't change. As we just need more patience to wait for
the MSG_SMBXSRV_CONNECTION_PASSED message.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15346
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 8 13:59:58 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
Commit 5d66d5b84f introduced a
'verify_again:' target, if we ever hit that, we would leak
the existing filter_subreq.
Moving it just above a possible messaging_filtered_read_send()
will allow us to only clear it if we actually create a new
request. That will help us in the next commits.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15346
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This demonstrates the race quite easily against
Samba and works fine against Windows Server 2022.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15346
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
It seems commit 259129e8f4 was partly just
fantasy...
Windows clients just use 16 bytes for DCERPC_PKT_CO_CANCEL and
DCERPC_PKT_ORPHANED pdus.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15446
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 8 08:57:46 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
DCERPC_PKT_CO_CANCEL and DCERPC_PKT_ORPHANED don't have any payload by
default. In order to receive them via dcerpc_read_ncacn_packet_send/recv
we need to allow fragments with frag_len == DCERPC_NCACN_PAYLOAD_OFFSET.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15446
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
The PDUs were generated by Windows clients.
And we fail to parse them currently.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15446
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Otherwise we getthis kind of thing:
../../lib/replace/replace.c:837:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'strlcpy' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
strlcpy(buf, s, buflen);
../../third_party/heimdal/lib/roken/getarg.c:288:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'strlcat' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
strlcat(buf, "]", sizeof(buf));
because we found the symbol names in libc, but didn't check that the
functions are declared in <string.h>. We already include
<bsd/string.h> whenever we have it.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 8 05:35:08 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
We were wanting to ensure the string contains a zero byte, but
instead were checking for a non-zero byte.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We have been using `uint8_t *`, which works fine as far as
linking goes, but leads fuzz target developers to sometimes
forget why they can't just modify the passed in string instead of
copying it for modification (e.g. to NUL-terminate).
REF: https://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html#fuzz-target
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Allocate these objects on a shorter-lived memory context.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
