IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
the request, presumably due to the PROTECTED flag not being set. Setting
that flag (in make_sec_desc()) has much wider implications than just to
libsmbclient, so instead of modifying that, we'll remove security
descriptors by setting the number of ACEs to zero. At some point, we might
want to look into whether we should actually be setting the PROTECTED flag
in the DACL.
Reference http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/reskit/distrib/dsce_ctl_qxju.mspx?mfr=true
Derrell
Jeremy, I really apologize for doing this, but I just wanted to enjoy
converting the last SMB call :-)
I've left one little task for you there, I'm not certain that checking
the inbuf length is correct here.
Volker
Talked to both Tridge and Jeremy about this, Tridge said that there is a
special error message persuading OS/2 to fall back to other methods.
The calls now checked in always return the error message we used to
return when "read bmpx = False" was set (the default): ERRSRV, ERRuseSTD.
If someone has a reproducable test case where this is really needed, we
can always dig it up from version control and convert it to the new API.
But that time without that silly parameter, and with a torture test case
for "make test" please :-)
Volker
length_is() isn't supported without size_is().
I assume what we need is an array of strings,
so the code isn't used and broken anyway without
a testsuite...just get rid of the pidl warning
metze
prs_mem_free() is not the function to be called to free memory allocated by
prs_alloc_mem(). I've added a comment so others may not get bitten too.
- Remove incorrect memory free calls added yesterday to replace SAFE_FREE.
The memory is actually now on a talloc context, so gets freed by the caller
when that context is freed. We don't need to free it iternally.
Derrell
