linux/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c

1028 lines
28 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* Kernel-based Virtual Machine -- Performance Monitoring Unit support
*
* Copyright 2015 Red Hat, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
*
* Authors:
* Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
* Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
* Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com>
*/
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
#include <linux/bsearch.h>
#include <linux/sort.h>
#include <asm/perf_event.h>
#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
#include "x86.h"
#include "cpuid.h"
#include "lapic.h"
#include "pmu.h"
/* This is enough to filter the vast majority of currently defined events. */
#define KVM_PMU_EVENT_FILTER_MAX_EVENTS 300
struct x86_pmu_capability __read_mostly kvm_pmu_cap;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_pmu_cap);
struct kvm_pmu_emulated_event_selectors __read_mostly kvm_pmu_eventsel;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_pmu_eventsel);
KVM: x86/pmu: Add PRIR++ and PDist support for SPR and later models The pebs capability on the SPR is basically the same as Ice Lake Server with the exception of two special facilities that have been enhanced and require special handling. Upon triggering a PEBS assist, there will be a finite delay between the time the counter overflows and when the microcode starts to carry out its data collection obligations. Even if the delay is constant in core clock space, it invariably manifest as variable "skids" in instruction address space. On the Ice Lake Server, the Precise Distribution of Instructions Retire (PDIR) facility mitigates the "skid" problem by providing an early indication of when the counter is about to overflow. On SPR, the PDIR counter available (Fixed 0) is unchanged, but the capability is enhanced to Instruction-Accurate PDIR (PDIR++), where PEBS is taken on the next instruction after the one that caused the overflow. SPR also introduces a new Precise Distribution (PDist) facility only on general programmable counter 0. Per Intel SDM, PDist eliminates any skid or shadowing effects from PEBS. With PDist, the PEBS record will be generated precisely upon completion of the instruction or operation that causes the counter to overflow (there is no "wait for next occurrence" by default). In terms of KVM handling, when guest accesses those special counters, the KVM needs to request the same index counters via the perf_event kernel subsystem to ensure that the guest uses the correct pebs hardware counter (PRIR++ or PDist). This is mainly achieved by adjusting the event precise level to the maximum, where the semantics of this magic number is mainly defined by the internal software context of perf_event and it's also backwards compatible as part of the user space interface. Opportunistically, refine confusing comments on TNT+, as the only ones that currently support pebs_ept are Ice Lake server and SPR (GLC+). Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221109082802.27543-3-likexu@tencent.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-11-09 11:28:01 +03:00
/* Precise Distribution of Instructions Retired (PDIR) */
static const struct x86_cpu_id vmx_pebs_pdir_cpu[] = {
X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ICELAKE_D, NULL),
X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ICELAKE_X, NULL),
KVM: x86/pmu: Add PRIR++ and PDist support for SPR and later models The pebs capability on the SPR is basically the same as Ice Lake Server with the exception of two special facilities that have been enhanced and require special handling. Upon triggering a PEBS assist, there will be a finite delay between the time the counter overflows and when the microcode starts to carry out its data collection obligations. Even if the delay is constant in core clock space, it invariably manifest as variable "skids" in instruction address space. On the Ice Lake Server, the Precise Distribution of Instructions Retire (PDIR) facility mitigates the "skid" problem by providing an early indication of when the counter is about to overflow. On SPR, the PDIR counter available (Fixed 0) is unchanged, but the capability is enhanced to Instruction-Accurate PDIR (PDIR++), where PEBS is taken on the next instruction after the one that caused the overflow. SPR also introduces a new Precise Distribution (PDist) facility only on general programmable counter 0. Per Intel SDM, PDist eliminates any skid or shadowing effects from PEBS. With PDist, the PEBS record will be generated precisely upon completion of the instruction or operation that causes the counter to overflow (there is no "wait for next occurrence" by default). In terms of KVM handling, when guest accesses those special counters, the KVM needs to request the same index counters via the perf_event kernel subsystem to ensure that the guest uses the correct pebs hardware counter (PRIR++ or PDist). This is mainly achieved by adjusting the event precise level to the maximum, where the semantics of this magic number is mainly defined by the internal software context of perf_event and it's also backwards compatible as part of the user space interface. Opportunistically, refine confusing comments on TNT+, as the only ones that currently support pebs_ept are Ice Lake server and SPR (GLC+). Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221109082802.27543-3-likexu@tencent.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-11-09 11:28:01 +03:00
/* Instruction-Accurate PDIR (PDIR++) */
X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(SAPPHIRERAPIDS_X, NULL),
{}
};
/* Precise Distribution (PDist) */
static const struct x86_cpu_id vmx_pebs_pdist_cpu[] = {
X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(SAPPHIRERAPIDS_X, NULL),
{}
};
/* NOTE:
* - Each perf counter is defined as "struct kvm_pmc";
* - There are two types of perf counters: general purpose (gp) and fixed.
* gp counters are stored in gp_counters[] and fixed counters are stored
* in fixed_counters[] respectively. Both of them are part of "struct
* kvm_pmu";
* - pmu.c understands the difference between gp counters and fixed counters.
* However AMD doesn't support fixed-counters;
* - There are three types of index to access perf counters (PMC):
* 1. MSR (named msr): For example Intel has MSR_IA32_PERFCTRn and AMD
* has MSR_K7_PERFCTRn and, for families 15H and later,
* MSR_F15H_PERF_CTRn, where MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR[0-3] are
* aliased to MSR_K7_PERFCTRn.
* 2. MSR Index (named idx): This normally is used by RDPMC instruction.
* For instance AMD RDPMC instruction uses 0000_0003h in ECX to access
* C001_0007h (MSR_K7_PERCTR3). Intel has a similar mechanism, except
* that it also supports fixed counters. idx can be used to as index to
* gp and fixed counters.
* 3. Global PMC Index (named pmc): pmc is an index specific to PMU
* code. Each pmc, stored in kvm_pmc.idx field, is unique across
* all perf counters (both gp and fixed). The mapping relationship
* between pmc and perf counters is as the following:
* * Intel: [0 .. KVM_INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC-1] <=> gp counters
* [KVM_FIXED_PMC_BASE_IDX .. KVM_FIXED_PMC_BASE_IDX + 2] <=> fixed
* * AMD: [0 .. AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS-1] and, for families 15H
* and later, [0 .. AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS_CORE-1] <=> gp counters
*/
static struct kvm_pmu_ops kvm_pmu_ops __read_mostly;
#define KVM_X86_PMU_OP(func) \
DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(kvm_x86_pmu_##func, \
*(((struct kvm_pmu_ops *)0)->func));
#define KVM_X86_PMU_OP_OPTIONAL KVM_X86_PMU_OP
#include <asm/kvm-x86-pmu-ops.h>
void kvm_pmu_ops_update(const struct kvm_pmu_ops *pmu_ops)
{
memcpy(&kvm_pmu_ops, pmu_ops, sizeof(kvm_pmu_ops));
#define __KVM_X86_PMU_OP(func) \
static_call_update(kvm_x86_pmu_##func, kvm_pmu_ops.func);
#define KVM_X86_PMU_OP(func) \
WARN_ON(!kvm_pmu_ops.func); __KVM_X86_PMU_OP(func)
#define KVM_X86_PMU_OP_OPTIONAL __KVM_X86_PMU_OP
#include <asm/kvm-x86-pmu-ops.h>
#undef __KVM_X86_PMU_OP
}
static inline void __kvm_perf_overflow(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, bool in_pmi)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = pmc_to_pmu(pmc);
bool skip_pmi = false;
if (pmc->perf_event && pmc->perf_event->attr.precise_ip) {
if (!in_pmi) {
/*
* TODO: KVM is currently _choosing_ to not generate records
* for emulated instructions, avoiding BUFFER_OVF PMI when
* there are no records. Strictly speaking, it should be done
* as well in the right context to improve sampling accuracy.
*/
skip_pmi = true;
} else {
/* Indicate PEBS overflow PMI to guest. */
skip_pmi = __test_and_set_bit(GLOBAL_STATUS_BUFFER_OVF_BIT,
(unsigned long *)&pmu->global_status);
}
} else {
__set_bit(pmc->idx, (unsigned long *)&pmu->global_status);
}
KVM: x86/pmu: Synthesize at most one PMI per VM-exit When the irq_work callback, kvm_pmi_trigger_fn(), is invoked during a VM-exit that also invokes __kvm_perf_overflow() as a result of instruction emulation, kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi() will be called twice before the next VM-entry. Calling kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi() twice is unlikely to be problematic now that KVM sets the LVTPC mask bit when delivering a PMI. But using IRQ work to trigger the PMI is still broken, albeit very theoretically. E.g. if the self-IPI to trigger IRQ work is be delayed long enough for the vCPU to be migrated to a different pCPU, then it's possible for kvm_pmi_trigger_fn() to race with the kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi() from KVM_REQ_PMI and still generate two PMIs. KVM could set the mask bit using an atomic operation, but that'd just be piling on unnecessary code to workaround what is effectively a hack. The *only* reason KVM uses IRQ work is to ensure the PMI is treated as a wake event, e.g. if the vCPU just executed HLT. Remove the irq_work callback for synthesizing a PMI, and all of the logic for invoking it. Instead, to prevent a vcpu from leaving C0 with a PMI pending, add a check for KVM_REQ_PMI to kvm_vcpu_has_events(). Fixes: 9cd803d496e7 ("KVM: x86: Update vPMCs when retiring instructions") Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Tested-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Tested-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230925173448.3518223-2-mizhang@google.com [sean: massage changelog] Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2023-09-25 20:34:46 +03:00
if (pmc->intr && !skip_pmi)
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_PMI, pmc->vcpu);
}
static void kvm_perf_overflow(struct perf_event *perf_event,
struct perf_sample_data *data,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct kvm_pmc *pmc = perf_event->overflow_handler_context;
KVM: x86/pmu: Defer counter emulated overflow via pmc->prev_counter Defer reprogramming counters and handling overflow via KVM_REQ_PMU when incrementing counters. KVM skips emulated WRMSR in the VM-Exit fastpath, the fastpath runs with IRQs disabled, skipping instructions can increment and reprogram counters, reprogramming counters can sleep, and sleeping is disallowed while IRQs are disabled. [*] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:580 [*] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 2981888, name: CPU 15/KVM [*] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 [*] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 [*] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [*] irq event stamp: 0 [*] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [*] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff8121222a>] copy_process+0x146a/0x62d0 [*] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff81212269>] copy_process+0x14a9/0x62d0 [*] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [*] Preemption disabled at: [*] [<ffffffffc2063fc1>] vcpu_enter_guest+0x1001/0x3dc0 [kvm] [*] CPU: 17 PID: 2981888 Comm: CPU 15/KVM Kdump: 5.19.0-rc1-g239111db364c-dirty #2 [*] Call Trace: [*] <TASK> [*] dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x9b [*] __might_resched.cold+0x22e/0x297 [*] __mutex_lock+0xc0/0x23b0 [*] perf_event_ctx_lock_nested+0x18f/0x340 [*] perf_event_pause+0x1a/0x110 [*] reprogram_counter+0x2af/0x1490 [kvm] [*] kvm_pmu_trigger_event+0x429/0x950 [kvm] [*] kvm_skip_emulated_instruction+0x48/0x90 [kvm] [*] handle_fastpath_set_msr_irqoff+0x349/0x3b0 [kvm] [*] vmx_vcpu_run+0x268e/0x3b80 [kvm_intel] [*] vcpu_enter_guest+0x1d22/0x3dc0 [kvm] Add a field to kvm_pmc to track the previous counter value in order to defer overflow detection to kvm_pmu_handle_event() (the counter must be paused before handling overflow, and that may increment the counter). Opportunistically shrink sizeof(struct kvm_pmc) a bit. Suggested-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Fixes: 9cd803d496e7 ("KVM: x86: Update vPMCs when retiring instructions") Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220831085328.45489-6-likexu@tencent.com [sean: avoid re-triggering KVM_REQ_PMU on overflow, tweak changelog] Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20220923001355.3741194-5-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-09-23 03:13:55 +03:00
/*
KVM: x86/pmu: Track emulated counter events instead of previous counter Explicitly track emulated counter events instead of using the common counter value that's shared with the hardware counter owned by perf. Bumping the common counter requires snapshotting the pre-increment value in order to detect overflow from emulation, and the snapshot approach is inherently flawed. Snapshotting the previous counter at every increment assumes that there is at most one emulated counter event per emulated instruction (or rather, between checks for KVM_REQ_PMU). That's mostly holds true today because KVM only emulates (branch) instructions retired, but the approach will fall apart if KVM ever supports event types that don't have a 1:1 relationship with instructions. And KVM already has a relevant bug, as handle_invalid_guest_state() emulates multiple instructions without checking KVM_REQ_PMU, i.e. could miss an overflow event due to clobbering pmc->prev_counter. Not checking KVM_REQ_PMU is problematic in both cases, but at least with the emulated counter approach, the resulting behavior is delayed overflow detection, as opposed to completely lost detection. Tracking the emulated count fixes another bug where the snapshot approach can signal spurious overflow due to incorporating both the emulated count and perf's count in the check, i.e. if overflow is detected by perf, then KVM's emulation will also incorrectly signal overflow. Add a comment in the related code to call out the need to process emulated events *after* pausing the perf event (big kudos to Mingwei for figuring out that particular wrinkle). Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Cc: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103230541.352265-7-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2023-11-04 02:05:41 +03:00
* Ignore asynchronous overflow events for counters that are scheduled
* to be reprogrammed, e.g. if a PMI for the previous event races with
* KVM's handling of a related guest WRMSR.
KVM: x86/pmu: Defer counter emulated overflow via pmc->prev_counter Defer reprogramming counters and handling overflow via KVM_REQ_PMU when incrementing counters. KVM skips emulated WRMSR in the VM-Exit fastpath, the fastpath runs with IRQs disabled, skipping instructions can increment and reprogram counters, reprogramming counters can sleep, and sleeping is disallowed while IRQs are disabled. [*] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:580 [*] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 2981888, name: CPU 15/KVM [*] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 [*] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 [*] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [*] irq event stamp: 0 [*] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [*] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff8121222a>] copy_process+0x146a/0x62d0 [*] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff81212269>] copy_process+0x14a9/0x62d0 [*] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [*] Preemption disabled at: [*] [<ffffffffc2063fc1>] vcpu_enter_guest+0x1001/0x3dc0 [kvm] [*] CPU: 17 PID: 2981888 Comm: CPU 15/KVM Kdump: 5.19.0-rc1-g239111db364c-dirty #2 [*] Call Trace: [*] <TASK> [*] dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x9b [*] __might_resched.cold+0x22e/0x297 [*] __mutex_lock+0xc0/0x23b0 [*] perf_event_ctx_lock_nested+0x18f/0x340 [*] perf_event_pause+0x1a/0x110 [*] reprogram_counter+0x2af/0x1490 [kvm] [*] kvm_pmu_trigger_event+0x429/0x950 [kvm] [*] kvm_skip_emulated_instruction+0x48/0x90 [kvm] [*] handle_fastpath_set_msr_irqoff+0x349/0x3b0 [kvm] [*] vmx_vcpu_run+0x268e/0x3b80 [kvm_intel] [*] vcpu_enter_guest+0x1d22/0x3dc0 [kvm] Add a field to kvm_pmc to track the previous counter value in order to defer overflow detection to kvm_pmu_handle_event() (the counter must be paused before handling overflow, and that may increment the counter). Opportunistically shrink sizeof(struct kvm_pmc) a bit. Suggested-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Fixes: 9cd803d496e7 ("KVM: x86: Update vPMCs when retiring instructions") Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220831085328.45489-6-likexu@tencent.com [sean: avoid re-triggering KVM_REQ_PMU on overflow, tweak changelog] Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20220923001355.3741194-5-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-09-23 03:13:55 +03:00
*/
if (test_and_set_bit(pmc->idx, pmc_to_pmu(pmc)->reprogram_pmi))
return;
__kvm_perf_overflow(pmc, true);
KVM: x86/pmu: Defer counter emulated overflow via pmc->prev_counter Defer reprogramming counters and handling overflow via KVM_REQ_PMU when incrementing counters. KVM skips emulated WRMSR in the VM-Exit fastpath, the fastpath runs with IRQs disabled, skipping instructions can increment and reprogram counters, reprogramming counters can sleep, and sleeping is disallowed while IRQs are disabled. [*] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:580 [*] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 2981888, name: CPU 15/KVM [*] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 [*] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 [*] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [*] irq event stamp: 0 [*] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [*] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff8121222a>] copy_process+0x146a/0x62d0 [*] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff81212269>] copy_process+0x14a9/0x62d0 [*] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [*] Preemption disabled at: [*] [<ffffffffc2063fc1>] vcpu_enter_guest+0x1001/0x3dc0 [kvm] [*] CPU: 17 PID: 2981888 Comm: CPU 15/KVM Kdump: 5.19.0-rc1-g239111db364c-dirty #2 [*] Call Trace: [*] <TASK> [*] dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x9b [*] __might_resched.cold+0x22e/0x297 [*] __mutex_lock+0xc0/0x23b0 [*] perf_event_ctx_lock_nested+0x18f/0x340 [*] perf_event_pause+0x1a/0x110 [*] reprogram_counter+0x2af/0x1490 [kvm] [*] kvm_pmu_trigger_event+0x429/0x950 [kvm] [*] kvm_skip_emulated_instruction+0x48/0x90 [kvm] [*] handle_fastpath_set_msr_irqoff+0x349/0x3b0 [kvm] [*] vmx_vcpu_run+0x268e/0x3b80 [kvm_intel] [*] vcpu_enter_guest+0x1d22/0x3dc0 [kvm] Add a field to kvm_pmc to track the previous counter value in order to defer overflow detection to kvm_pmu_handle_event() (the counter must be paused before handling overflow, and that may increment the counter). Opportunistically shrink sizeof(struct kvm_pmc) a bit. Suggested-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Fixes: 9cd803d496e7 ("KVM: x86: Update vPMCs when retiring instructions") Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220831085328.45489-6-likexu@tencent.com [sean: avoid re-triggering KVM_REQ_PMU on overflow, tweak changelog] Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20220923001355.3741194-5-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-09-23 03:13:55 +03:00
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_PMU, pmc->vcpu);
}
KVM: x86/pmu: Add PRIR++ and PDist support for SPR and later models The pebs capability on the SPR is basically the same as Ice Lake Server with the exception of two special facilities that have been enhanced and require special handling. Upon triggering a PEBS assist, there will be a finite delay between the time the counter overflows and when the microcode starts to carry out its data collection obligations. Even if the delay is constant in core clock space, it invariably manifest as variable "skids" in instruction address space. On the Ice Lake Server, the Precise Distribution of Instructions Retire (PDIR) facility mitigates the "skid" problem by providing an early indication of when the counter is about to overflow. On SPR, the PDIR counter available (Fixed 0) is unchanged, but the capability is enhanced to Instruction-Accurate PDIR (PDIR++), where PEBS is taken on the next instruction after the one that caused the overflow. SPR also introduces a new Precise Distribution (PDist) facility only on general programmable counter 0. Per Intel SDM, PDist eliminates any skid or shadowing effects from PEBS. With PDist, the PEBS record will be generated precisely upon completion of the instruction or operation that causes the counter to overflow (there is no "wait for next occurrence" by default). In terms of KVM handling, when guest accesses those special counters, the KVM needs to request the same index counters via the perf_event kernel subsystem to ensure that the guest uses the correct pebs hardware counter (PRIR++ or PDist). This is mainly achieved by adjusting the event precise level to the maximum, where the semantics of this magic number is mainly defined by the internal software context of perf_event and it's also backwards compatible as part of the user space interface. Opportunistically, refine confusing comments on TNT+, as the only ones that currently support pebs_ept are Ice Lake server and SPR (GLC+). Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221109082802.27543-3-likexu@tencent.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-11-09 11:28:01 +03:00
static u64 pmc_get_pebs_precise_level(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
/*
* For some model specific pebs counters with special capabilities
* (PDIR, PDIR++, PDIST), KVM needs to raise the event precise
* level to the maximum value (currently 3, backwards compatible)
* so that the perf subsystem would assign specific hardware counter
* with that capability for vPMC.
*/
if ((pmc->idx == 0 && x86_match_cpu(vmx_pebs_pdist_cpu)) ||
(pmc->idx == 32 && x86_match_cpu(vmx_pebs_pdir_cpu)))
return 3;
/*
* The non-zero precision level of guest event makes the ordinary
* guest event becomes a guest PEBS event and triggers the host
* PEBS PMI handler to determine whether the PEBS overflow PMI
* comes from the host counters or the guest.
*/
return 1;
}
static u64 get_sample_period(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 counter_value)
{
u64 sample_period = (-counter_value) & pmc_bitmask(pmc);
if (!sample_period)
sample_period = pmc_bitmask(pmc) + 1;
return sample_period;
}
static int pmc_reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u32 type, u64 config,
bool exclude_user, bool exclude_kernel,
bool intr)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = pmc_to_pmu(pmc);
struct perf_event *event;
struct perf_event_attr attr = {
.type = type,
.size = sizeof(attr),
.pinned = true,
.exclude_idle = true,
.exclude_host = 1,
.exclude_user = exclude_user,
.exclude_kernel = exclude_kernel,
.config = config,
};
bool pebs = test_bit(pmc->idx, (unsigned long *)&pmu->pebs_enable);
attr.sample_period = get_sample_period(pmc, pmc->counter);
if ((attr.config & HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED) &&
guest_cpuid_is_intel(pmc->vcpu)) {
/*
* HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED is not supported with nonzero
* period. Just clear the sample period so at least
* allocating the counter doesn't fail.
*/
attr.sample_period = 0;
}
if (pebs) {
/*
* For most PEBS hardware events, the difference in the software
* precision levels of guest and host PEBS events will not affect
* the accuracy of the PEBS profiling result, because the "event IP"
* in the PEBS record is calibrated on the guest side.
*/
KVM: x86/pmu: Add PRIR++ and PDist support for SPR and later models The pebs capability on the SPR is basically the same as Ice Lake Server with the exception of two special facilities that have been enhanced and require special handling. Upon triggering a PEBS assist, there will be a finite delay between the time the counter overflows and when the microcode starts to carry out its data collection obligations. Even if the delay is constant in core clock space, it invariably manifest as variable "skids" in instruction address space. On the Ice Lake Server, the Precise Distribution of Instructions Retire (PDIR) facility mitigates the "skid" problem by providing an early indication of when the counter is about to overflow. On SPR, the PDIR counter available (Fixed 0) is unchanged, but the capability is enhanced to Instruction-Accurate PDIR (PDIR++), where PEBS is taken on the next instruction after the one that caused the overflow. SPR also introduces a new Precise Distribution (PDist) facility only on general programmable counter 0. Per Intel SDM, PDist eliminates any skid or shadowing effects from PEBS. With PDist, the PEBS record will be generated precisely upon completion of the instruction or operation that causes the counter to overflow (there is no "wait for next occurrence" by default). In terms of KVM handling, when guest accesses those special counters, the KVM needs to request the same index counters via the perf_event kernel subsystem to ensure that the guest uses the correct pebs hardware counter (PRIR++ or PDist). This is mainly achieved by adjusting the event precise level to the maximum, where the semantics of this magic number is mainly defined by the internal software context of perf_event and it's also backwards compatible as part of the user space interface. Opportunistically, refine confusing comments on TNT+, as the only ones that currently support pebs_ept are Ice Lake server and SPR (GLC+). Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221109082802.27543-3-likexu@tencent.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-11-09 11:28:01 +03:00
attr.precise_ip = pmc_get_pebs_precise_level(pmc);
}
event = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, -1, current,
kvm_perf_overflow, pmc);
if (IS_ERR(event)) {
pr_debug_ratelimited("kvm_pmu: event creation failed %ld for pmc->idx = %d\n",
PTR_ERR(event), pmc->idx);
return PTR_ERR(event);
}
pmc->perf_event = event;
pmc_to_pmu(pmc)->event_count++;
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce pmc->is_paused to reduce the call time of perf interfaces Based on our observations, after any vm-exit associated with vPMU, there are at least two or more perf interfaces to be called for guest counter emulation, such as perf_event_{pause, read_value, period}(), and each one will {lock, unlock} the same perf_event_ctx. The frequency of calls becomes more severe when guest use counters in a multiplexed manner. Holding a lock once and completing the KVM request operations in the perf context would introduce a set of impractical new interfaces. So we can further optimize the vPMU implementation by avoiding repeated calls to these interfaces in the KVM context for at least one pattern: After we call perf_event_pause() once, the event will be disabled and its internal count will be reset to 0. So there is no need to pause it again or read its value. Once the event is paused, event period will not be updated until the next time it's resumed or reprogrammed. And there is also no need to call perf_event_period twice for a non-running counter, considering the perf_event for a running counter is never paused. Based on this implementation, for the following common usage of sampling 4 events using perf on a 4u8g guest: echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog echo 25 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_cpu_time_max_percent echo 10000 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_cpu_time_max_percent for i in `seq 1 1 10` do taskset -c 0 perf record \ -e cpu-cycles -e instructions -e branch-instructions -e cache-misses \ /root/br_instr a done the average latency of the guest NMI handler is reduced from 37646.7 ns to 32929.3 ns (~1.14x speed up) on the Intel ICX server. Also, in addition to collecting more samples, no loss of sampling accuracy was observed compared to before the optimization. Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com> Message-Id: <20210728120705.6855-1-likexu@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
2021-07-28 15:07:05 +03:00
pmc->is_paused = false;
pmc->intr = intr || pebs;
return 0;
}
KVM: x86/pmu: Track emulated counter events instead of previous counter Explicitly track emulated counter events instead of using the common counter value that's shared with the hardware counter owned by perf. Bumping the common counter requires snapshotting the pre-increment value in order to detect overflow from emulation, and the snapshot approach is inherently flawed. Snapshotting the previous counter at every increment assumes that there is at most one emulated counter event per emulated instruction (or rather, between checks for KVM_REQ_PMU). That's mostly holds true today because KVM only emulates (branch) instructions retired, but the approach will fall apart if KVM ever supports event types that don't have a 1:1 relationship with instructions. And KVM already has a relevant bug, as handle_invalid_guest_state() emulates multiple instructions without checking KVM_REQ_PMU, i.e. could miss an overflow event due to clobbering pmc->prev_counter. Not checking KVM_REQ_PMU is problematic in both cases, but at least with the emulated counter approach, the resulting behavior is delayed overflow detection, as opposed to completely lost detection. Tracking the emulated count fixes another bug where the snapshot approach can signal spurious overflow due to incorporating both the emulated count and perf's count in the check, i.e. if overflow is detected by perf, then KVM's emulation will also incorrectly signal overflow. Add a comment in the related code to call out the need to process emulated events *after* pausing the perf event (big kudos to Mingwei for figuring out that particular wrinkle). Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Cc: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103230541.352265-7-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2023-11-04 02:05:41 +03:00
static bool pmc_pause_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
KVM: x86/vPMU: Reuse perf_event to avoid unnecessary pmc_reprogram_counter The perf_event_create_kernel_counter() in the pmc_reprogram_counter() is a heavyweight and high-frequency operation, especially when host disables the watchdog (maximum 21000000 ns) which leads to an unacceptable latency of the guest NMI handler. It limits the use of vPMUs in the guest. When a vPMC is fully enabled, the legacy reprogram_*_counter() would stop and release its existing perf_event (if any) every time EVEN in most cases almost the same requested perf_event will be created and configured again. For each vPMC, if the reuqested config ('u64 eventsel' for gp and 'u8 ctrl' for fixed) is the same as its current config AND a new sample period based on pmc->counter is accepted by host perf interface, the current event could be reused safely as a new created one does. Otherwise, do release the undesirable perf_event and reprogram a new one as usual. It's light-weight to call pmc_pause_counter (disable, read and reset event) and pmc_resume_counter (recalibrate period and re-enable event) as guest expects instead of release-and-create again on any condition. Compared to use the filterable event->attr or hw.config, a new 'u64 current_config' field is added to save the last original programed config for each vPMC. Based on this implementation, the number of calls to pmc_reprogram_counter is reduced by ~82.5% for a gp sampling event and ~99.9% for a fixed event. In the usage of multiplexing perf sampling mode, the average latency of the guest NMI handler is reduced from 104923 ns to 48393 ns (~2.16x speed up). If host disables watchdog, the minimum latecy of guest NMI handler could be speed up at ~3413x (from 20407603 to 5979 ns) and at ~786x in the average. Suggested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2019-10-27 13:52:42 +03:00
{
u64 counter = pmc->counter;
KVM: x86/pmu: Track emulated counter events instead of previous counter Explicitly track emulated counter events instead of using the common counter value that's shared with the hardware counter owned by perf. Bumping the common counter requires snapshotting the pre-increment value in order to detect overflow from emulation, and the snapshot approach is inherently flawed. Snapshotting the previous counter at every increment assumes that there is at most one emulated counter event per emulated instruction (or rather, between checks for KVM_REQ_PMU). That's mostly holds true today because KVM only emulates (branch) instructions retired, but the approach will fall apart if KVM ever supports event types that don't have a 1:1 relationship with instructions. And KVM already has a relevant bug, as handle_invalid_guest_state() emulates multiple instructions without checking KVM_REQ_PMU, i.e. could miss an overflow event due to clobbering pmc->prev_counter. Not checking KVM_REQ_PMU is problematic in both cases, but at least with the emulated counter approach, the resulting behavior is delayed overflow detection, as opposed to completely lost detection. Tracking the emulated count fixes another bug where the snapshot approach can signal spurious overflow due to incorporating both the emulated count and perf's count in the check, i.e. if overflow is detected by perf, then KVM's emulation will also incorrectly signal overflow. Add a comment in the related code to call out the need to process emulated events *after* pausing the perf event (big kudos to Mingwei for figuring out that particular wrinkle). Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Cc: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103230541.352265-7-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2023-11-04 02:05:41 +03:00
u64 prev_counter;
KVM: x86/vPMU: Reuse perf_event to avoid unnecessary pmc_reprogram_counter The perf_event_create_kernel_counter() in the pmc_reprogram_counter() is a heavyweight and high-frequency operation, especially when host disables the watchdog (maximum 21000000 ns) which leads to an unacceptable latency of the guest NMI handler. It limits the use of vPMUs in the guest. When a vPMC is fully enabled, the legacy reprogram_*_counter() would stop and release its existing perf_event (if any) every time EVEN in most cases almost the same requested perf_event will be created and configured again. For each vPMC, if the reuqested config ('u64 eventsel' for gp and 'u8 ctrl' for fixed) is the same as its current config AND a new sample period based on pmc->counter is accepted by host perf interface, the current event could be reused safely as a new created one does. Otherwise, do release the undesirable perf_event and reprogram a new one as usual. It's light-weight to call pmc_pause_counter (disable, read and reset event) and pmc_resume_counter (recalibrate period and re-enable event) as guest expects instead of release-and-create again on any condition. Compared to use the filterable event->attr or hw.config, a new 'u64 current_config' field is added to save the last original programed config for each vPMC. Based on this implementation, the number of calls to pmc_reprogram_counter is reduced by ~82.5% for a gp sampling event and ~99.9% for a fixed event. In the usage of multiplexing perf sampling mode, the average latency of the guest NMI handler is reduced from 104923 ns to 48393 ns (~2.16x speed up). If host disables watchdog, the minimum latecy of guest NMI handler could be speed up at ~3413x (from 20407603 to 5979 ns) and at ~786x in the average. Suggested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2019-10-27 13:52:42 +03:00
/* update counter, reset event value to avoid redundant accumulation */
KVM: x86/pmu: Track emulated counter events instead of previous counter Explicitly track emulated counter events instead of using the common counter value that's shared with the hardware counter owned by perf. Bumping the common counter requires snapshotting the pre-increment value in order to detect overflow from emulation, and the snapshot approach is inherently flawed. Snapshotting the previous counter at every increment assumes that there is at most one emulated counter event per emulated instruction (or rather, between checks for KVM_REQ_PMU). That's mostly holds true today because KVM only emulates (branch) instructions retired, but the approach will fall apart if KVM ever supports event types that don't have a 1:1 relationship with instructions. And KVM already has a relevant bug, as handle_invalid_guest_state() emulates multiple instructions without checking KVM_REQ_PMU, i.e. could miss an overflow event due to clobbering pmc->prev_counter. Not checking KVM_REQ_PMU is problematic in both cases, but at least with the emulated counter approach, the resulting behavior is delayed overflow detection, as opposed to completely lost detection. Tracking the emulated count fixes another bug where the snapshot approach can signal spurious overflow due to incorporating both the emulated count and perf's count in the check, i.e. if overflow is detected by perf, then KVM's emulation will also incorrectly signal overflow. Add a comment in the related code to call out the need to process emulated events *after* pausing the perf event (big kudos to Mingwei for figuring out that particular wrinkle). Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Cc: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103230541.352265-7-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2023-11-04 02:05:41 +03:00
if (pmc->perf_event && !pmc->is_paused)
counter += perf_event_pause(pmc->perf_event, true);
/*
* Snapshot the previous counter *after* accumulating state from perf.
* If overflow already happened, hardware (via perf) is responsible for
* generating a PMI. KVM just needs to detect overflow on emulated
* counter events that haven't yet been processed.
*/
prev_counter = counter & pmc_bitmask(pmc);
counter += pmc->emulated_counter;
KVM: x86/vPMU: Reuse perf_event to avoid unnecessary pmc_reprogram_counter The perf_event_create_kernel_counter() in the pmc_reprogram_counter() is a heavyweight and high-frequency operation, especially when host disables the watchdog (maximum 21000000 ns) which leads to an unacceptable latency of the guest NMI handler. It limits the use of vPMUs in the guest. When a vPMC is fully enabled, the legacy reprogram_*_counter() would stop and release its existing perf_event (if any) every time EVEN in most cases almost the same requested perf_event will be created and configured again. For each vPMC, if the reuqested config ('u64 eventsel' for gp and 'u8 ctrl' for fixed) is the same as its current config AND a new sample period based on pmc->counter is accepted by host perf interface, the current event could be reused safely as a new created one does. Otherwise, do release the undesirable perf_event and reprogram a new one as usual. It's light-weight to call pmc_pause_counter (disable, read and reset event) and pmc_resume_counter (recalibrate period and re-enable event) as guest expects instead of release-and-create again on any condition. Compared to use the filterable event->attr or hw.config, a new 'u64 current_config' field is added to save the last original programed config for each vPMC. Based on this implementation, the number of calls to pmc_reprogram_counter is reduced by ~82.5% for a gp sampling event and ~99.9% for a fixed event. In the usage of multiplexing perf sampling mode, the average latency of the guest NMI handler is reduced from 104923 ns to 48393 ns (~2.16x speed up). If host disables watchdog, the minimum latecy of guest NMI handler could be speed up at ~3413x (from 20407603 to 5979 ns) and at ~786x in the average. Suggested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2019-10-27 13:52:42 +03:00
pmc->counter = counter & pmc_bitmask(pmc);
KVM: x86/pmu: Track emulated counter events instead of previous counter Explicitly track emulated counter events instead of using the common counter value that's shared with the hardware counter owned by perf. Bumping the common counter requires snapshotting the pre-increment value in order to detect overflow from emulation, and the snapshot approach is inherently flawed. Snapshotting the previous counter at every increment assumes that there is at most one emulated counter event per emulated instruction (or rather, between checks for KVM_REQ_PMU). That's mostly holds true today because KVM only emulates (branch) instructions retired, but the approach will fall apart if KVM ever supports event types that don't have a 1:1 relationship with instructions. And KVM already has a relevant bug, as handle_invalid_guest_state() emulates multiple instructions without checking KVM_REQ_PMU, i.e. could miss an overflow event due to clobbering pmc->prev_counter. Not checking KVM_REQ_PMU is problematic in both cases, but at least with the emulated counter approach, the resulting behavior is delayed overflow detection, as opposed to completely lost detection. Tracking the emulated count fixes another bug where the snapshot approach can signal spurious overflow due to incorporating both the emulated count and perf's count in the check, i.e. if overflow is detected by perf, then KVM's emulation will also incorrectly signal overflow. Add a comment in the related code to call out the need to process emulated events *after* pausing the perf event (big kudos to Mingwei for figuring out that particular wrinkle). Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Cc: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103230541.352265-7-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2023-11-04 02:05:41 +03:00
pmc->emulated_counter = 0;
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce pmc->is_paused to reduce the call time of perf interfaces Based on our observations, after any vm-exit associated with vPMU, there are at least two or more perf interfaces to be called for guest counter emulation, such as perf_event_{pause, read_value, period}(), and each one will {lock, unlock} the same perf_event_ctx. The frequency of calls becomes more severe when guest use counters in a multiplexed manner. Holding a lock once and completing the KVM request operations in the perf context would introduce a set of impractical new interfaces. So we can further optimize the vPMU implementation by avoiding repeated calls to these interfaces in the KVM context for at least one pattern: After we call perf_event_pause() once, the event will be disabled and its internal count will be reset to 0. So there is no need to pause it again or read its value. Once the event is paused, event period will not be updated until the next time it's resumed or reprogrammed. And there is also no need to call perf_event_period twice for a non-running counter, considering the perf_event for a running counter is never paused. Based on this implementation, for the following common usage of sampling 4 events using perf on a 4u8g guest: echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog echo 25 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_cpu_time_max_percent echo 10000 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_cpu_time_max_percent for i in `seq 1 1 10` do taskset -c 0 perf record \ -e cpu-cycles -e instructions -e branch-instructions -e cache-misses \ /root/br_instr a done the average latency of the guest NMI handler is reduced from 37646.7 ns to 32929.3 ns (~1.14x speed up) on the Intel ICX server. Also, in addition to collecting more samples, no loss of sampling accuracy was observed compared to before the optimization. Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com> Message-Id: <20210728120705.6855-1-likexu@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
2021-07-28 15:07:05 +03:00
pmc->is_paused = true;
KVM: x86/pmu: Track emulated counter events instead of previous counter Explicitly track emulated counter events instead of using the common counter value that's shared with the hardware counter owned by perf. Bumping the common counter requires snapshotting the pre-increment value in order to detect overflow from emulation, and the snapshot approach is inherently flawed. Snapshotting the previous counter at every increment assumes that there is at most one emulated counter event per emulated instruction (or rather, between checks for KVM_REQ_PMU). That's mostly holds true today because KVM only emulates (branch) instructions retired, but the approach will fall apart if KVM ever supports event types that don't have a 1:1 relationship with instructions. And KVM already has a relevant bug, as handle_invalid_guest_state() emulates multiple instructions without checking KVM_REQ_PMU, i.e. could miss an overflow event due to clobbering pmc->prev_counter. Not checking KVM_REQ_PMU is problematic in both cases, but at least with the emulated counter approach, the resulting behavior is delayed overflow detection, as opposed to completely lost detection. Tracking the emulated count fixes another bug where the snapshot approach can signal spurious overflow due to incorporating both the emulated count and perf's count in the check, i.e. if overflow is detected by perf, then KVM's emulation will also incorrectly signal overflow. Add a comment in the related code to call out the need to process emulated events *after* pausing the perf event (big kudos to Mingwei for figuring out that particular wrinkle). Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Cc: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103230541.352265-7-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2023-11-04 02:05:41 +03:00
return pmc->counter < prev_counter;
KVM: x86/vPMU: Reuse perf_event to avoid unnecessary pmc_reprogram_counter The perf_event_create_kernel_counter() in the pmc_reprogram_counter() is a heavyweight and high-frequency operation, especially when host disables the watchdog (maximum 21000000 ns) which leads to an unacceptable latency of the guest NMI handler. It limits the use of vPMUs in the guest. When a vPMC is fully enabled, the legacy reprogram_*_counter() would stop and release its existing perf_event (if any) every time EVEN in most cases almost the same requested perf_event will be created and configured again. For each vPMC, if the reuqested config ('u64 eventsel' for gp and 'u8 ctrl' for fixed) is the same as its current config AND a new sample period based on pmc->counter is accepted by host perf interface, the current event could be reused safely as a new created one does. Otherwise, do release the undesirable perf_event and reprogram a new one as usual. It's light-weight to call pmc_pause_counter (disable, read and reset event) and pmc_resume_counter (recalibrate period and re-enable event) as guest expects instead of release-and-create again on any condition. Compared to use the filterable event->attr or hw.config, a new 'u64 current_config' field is added to save the last original programed config for each vPMC. Based on this implementation, the number of calls to pmc_reprogram_counter is reduced by ~82.5% for a gp sampling event and ~99.9% for a fixed event. In the usage of multiplexing perf sampling mode, the average latency of the guest NMI handler is reduced from 104923 ns to 48393 ns (~2.16x speed up). If host disables watchdog, the minimum latecy of guest NMI handler could be speed up at ~3413x (from 20407603 to 5979 ns) and at ~786x in the average. Suggested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2019-10-27 13:52:42 +03:00
}
static bool pmc_resume_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
if (!pmc->perf_event)
return false;
/* recalibrate sample period and check if it's accepted by perf core */
if (is_sampling_event(pmc->perf_event) &&
perf_event_period(pmc->perf_event,
get_sample_period(pmc, pmc->counter)))
KVM: x86/vPMU: Reuse perf_event to avoid unnecessary pmc_reprogram_counter The perf_event_create_kernel_counter() in the pmc_reprogram_counter() is a heavyweight and high-frequency operation, especially when host disables the watchdog (maximum 21000000 ns) which leads to an unacceptable latency of the guest NMI handler. It limits the use of vPMUs in the guest. When a vPMC is fully enabled, the legacy reprogram_*_counter() would stop and release its existing perf_event (if any) every time EVEN in most cases almost the same requested perf_event will be created and configured again. For each vPMC, if the reuqested config ('u64 eventsel' for gp and 'u8 ctrl' for fixed) is the same as its current config AND a new sample period based on pmc->counter is accepted by host perf interface, the current event could be reused safely as a new created one does. Otherwise, do release the undesirable perf_event and reprogram a new one as usual. It's light-weight to call pmc_pause_counter (disable, read and reset event) and pmc_resume_counter (recalibrate period and re-enable event) as guest expects instead of release-and-create again on any condition. Compared to use the filterable event->attr or hw.config, a new 'u64 current_config' field is added to save the last original programed config for each vPMC. Based on this implementation, the number of calls to pmc_reprogram_counter is reduced by ~82.5% for a gp sampling event and ~99.9% for a fixed event. In the usage of multiplexing perf sampling mode, the average latency of the guest NMI handler is reduced from 104923 ns to 48393 ns (~2.16x speed up). If host disables watchdog, the minimum latecy of guest NMI handler could be speed up at ~3413x (from 20407603 to 5979 ns) and at ~786x in the average. Suggested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2019-10-27 13:52:42 +03:00
return false;
if (test_bit(pmc->idx, (unsigned long *)&pmc_to_pmu(pmc)->pebs_enable) !=
(!!pmc->perf_event->attr.precise_ip))
return false;
KVM: x86/vPMU: Reuse perf_event to avoid unnecessary pmc_reprogram_counter The perf_event_create_kernel_counter() in the pmc_reprogram_counter() is a heavyweight and high-frequency operation, especially when host disables the watchdog (maximum 21000000 ns) which leads to an unacceptable latency of the guest NMI handler. It limits the use of vPMUs in the guest. When a vPMC is fully enabled, the legacy reprogram_*_counter() would stop and release its existing perf_event (if any) every time EVEN in most cases almost the same requested perf_event will be created and configured again. For each vPMC, if the reuqested config ('u64 eventsel' for gp and 'u8 ctrl' for fixed) is the same as its current config AND a new sample period based on pmc->counter is accepted by host perf interface, the current event could be reused safely as a new created one does. Otherwise, do release the undesirable perf_event and reprogram a new one as usual. It's light-weight to call pmc_pause_counter (disable, read and reset event) and pmc_resume_counter (recalibrate period and re-enable event) as guest expects instead of release-and-create again on any condition. Compared to use the filterable event->attr or hw.config, a new 'u64 current_config' field is added to save the last original programed config for each vPMC. Based on this implementation, the number of calls to pmc_reprogram_counter is reduced by ~82.5% for a gp sampling event and ~99.9% for a fixed event. In the usage of multiplexing perf sampling mode, the average latency of the guest NMI handler is reduced from 104923 ns to 48393 ns (~2.16x speed up). If host disables watchdog, the minimum latecy of guest NMI handler could be speed up at ~3413x (from 20407603 to 5979 ns) and at ~786x in the average. Suggested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2019-10-27 13:52:42 +03:00
/* reuse perf_event to serve as pmc_reprogram_counter() does*/
perf_event_enable(pmc->perf_event);
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce pmc->is_paused to reduce the call time of perf interfaces Based on our observations, after any vm-exit associated with vPMU, there are at least two or more perf interfaces to be called for guest counter emulation, such as perf_event_{pause, read_value, period}(), and each one will {lock, unlock} the same perf_event_ctx. The frequency of calls becomes more severe when guest use counters in a multiplexed manner. Holding a lock once and completing the KVM request operations in the perf context would introduce a set of impractical new interfaces. So we can further optimize the vPMU implementation by avoiding repeated calls to these interfaces in the KVM context for at least one pattern: After we call perf_event_pause() once, the event will be disabled and its internal count will be reset to 0. So there is no need to pause it again or read its value. Once the event is paused, event period will not be updated until the next time it's resumed or reprogrammed. And there is also no need to call perf_event_period twice for a non-running counter, considering the perf_event for a running counter is never paused. Based on this implementation, for the following common usage of sampling 4 events using perf on a 4u8g guest: echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog echo 25 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_cpu_time_max_percent echo 10000 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_cpu_time_max_percent for i in `seq 1 1 10` do taskset -c 0 perf record \ -e cpu-cycles -e instructions -e branch-instructions -e cache-misses \ /root/br_instr a done the average latency of the guest NMI handler is reduced from 37646.7 ns to 32929.3 ns (~1.14x speed up) on the Intel ICX server. Also, in addition to collecting more samples, no loss of sampling accuracy was observed compared to before the optimization. Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com> Message-Id: <20210728120705.6855-1-likexu@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
2021-07-28 15:07:05 +03:00
pmc->is_paused = false;
KVM: x86/vPMU: Reuse perf_event to avoid unnecessary pmc_reprogram_counter The perf_event_create_kernel_counter() in the pmc_reprogram_counter() is a heavyweight and high-frequency operation, especially when host disables the watchdog (maximum 21000000 ns) which leads to an unacceptable latency of the guest NMI handler. It limits the use of vPMUs in the guest. When a vPMC is fully enabled, the legacy reprogram_*_counter() would stop and release its existing perf_event (if any) every time EVEN in most cases almost the same requested perf_event will be created and configured again. For each vPMC, if the reuqested config ('u64 eventsel' for gp and 'u8 ctrl' for fixed) is the same as its current config AND a new sample period based on pmc->counter is accepted by host perf interface, the current event could be reused safely as a new created one does. Otherwise, do release the undesirable perf_event and reprogram a new one as usual. It's light-weight to call pmc_pause_counter (disable, read and reset event) and pmc_resume_counter (recalibrate period and re-enable event) as guest expects instead of release-and-create again on any condition. Compared to use the filterable event->attr or hw.config, a new 'u64 current_config' field is added to save the last original programed config for each vPMC. Based on this implementation, the number of calls to pmc_reprogram_counter is reduced by ~82.5% for a gp sampling event and ~99.9% for a fixed event. In the usage of multiplexing perf sampling mode, the average latency of the guest NMI handler is reduced from 104923 ns to 48393 ns (~2.16x speed up). If host disables watchdog, the minimum latecy of guest NMI handler could be speed up at ~3413x (from 20407603 to 5979 ns) and at ~786x in the average. Suggested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2019-10-27 13:52:42 +03:00
return true;
}
static void pmc_release_perf_event(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
if (pmc->perf_event) {
perf_event_release_kernel(pmc->perf_event);
pmc->perf_event = NULL;
pmc->current_config = 0;
pmc_to_pmu(pmc)->event_count--;
}
}
static void pmc_stop_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
if (pmc->perf_event) {
pmc->counter = pmc_read_counter(pmc);
pmc_release_perf_event(pmc);
}
}
static void pmc_update_sample_period(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
if (!pmc->perf_event || pmc->is_paused ||
!is_sampling_event(pmc->perf_event))
return;
perf_event_period(pmc->perf_event,
get_sample_period(pmc, pmc->counter));
}
void pmc_write_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 val)
{
KVM: x86/pmu: Track emulated counter events instead of previous counter Explicitly track emulated counter events instead of using the common counter value that's shared with the hardware counter owned by perf. Bumping the common counter requires snapshotting the pre-increment value in order to detect overflow from emulation, and the snapshot approach is inherently flawed. Snapshotting the previous counter at every increment assumes that there is at most one emulated counter event per emulated instruction (or rather, between checks for KVM_REQ_PMU). That's mostly holds true today because KVM only emulates (branch) instructions retired, but the approach will fall apart if KVM ever supports event types that don't have a 1:1 relationship with instructions. And KVM already has a relevant bug, as handle_invalid_guest_state() emulates multiple instructions without checking KVM_REQ_PMU, i.e. could miss an overflow event due to clobbering pmc->prev_counter. Not checking KVM_REQ_PMU is problematic in both cases, but at least with the emulated counter approach, the resulting behavior is delayed overflow detection, as opposed to completely lost detection. Tracking the emulated count fixes another bug where the snapshot approach can signal spurious overflow due to incorporating both the emulated count and perf's count in the check, i.e. if overflow is detected by perf, then KVM's emulation will also incorrectly signal overflow. Add a comment in the related code to call out the need to process emulated events *after* pausing the perf event (big kudos to Mingwei for figuring out that particular wrinkle). Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Cc: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103230541.352265-7-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2023-11-04 02:05:41 +03:00
/*
* Drop any unconsumed accumulated counts, the WRMSR is a write, not a
* read-modify-write. Adjust the counter value so that its value is
* relative to the current count, as reading the current count from
* perf is faster than pausing and repgrogramming the event in order to
* reset it to '0'. Note, this very sneakily offsets the accumulated
* emulated count too, by using pmc_read_counter()!
*/
pmc->emulated_counter = 0;
pmc->counter += val - pmc_read_counter(pmc);
pmc->counter &= pmc_bitmask(pmc);
pmc_update_sample_period(pmc);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pmc_write_counter);
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
static int filter_cmp(const void *pa, const void *pb, u64 mask)
{
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
u64 a = *(u64 *)pa & mask;
u64 b = *(u64 *)pb & mask;
return (a > b) - (a < b);
}
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
static int filter_sort_cmp(const void *pa, const void *pb)
{
return filter_cmp(pa, pb, (KVM_PMU_MASKED_ENTRY_EVENT_SELECT |
KVM_PMU_MASKED_ENTRY_EXCLUDE));
}
/*
* For the event filter, searching is done on the 'includes' list and
* 'excludes' list separately rather than on the 'events' list (which
* has both). As a result the exclude bit can be ignored.
*/
static int filter_event_cmp(const void *pa, const void *pb)
{
return filter_cmp(pa, pb, (KVM_PMU_MASKED_ENTRY_EVENT_SELECT));
}
static int find_filter_index(u64 *events, u64 nevents, u64 key)
{
u64 *fe = bsearch(&key, events, nevents, sizeof(events[0]),
filter_event_cmp);
if (!fe)
return -1;
return fe - events;
}
static bool is_filter_entry_match(u64 filter_event, u64 umask)
{
u64 mask = filter_event >> (KVM_PMU_MASKED_ENTRY_UMASK_MASK_SHIFT - 8);
u64 match = filter_event & KVM_PMU_MASKED_ENTRY_UMASK_MATCH;
BUILD_BUG_ON((KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(0, 0xff, 0, false) >>
(KVM_PMU_MASKED_ENTRY_UMASK_MASK_SHIFT - 8)) !=
ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK);
return (umask & mask) == match;
}
static bool filter_contains_match(u64 *events, u64 nevents, u64 eventsel)
{
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
u64 event_select = eventsel & kvm_pmu_ops.EVENTSEL_EVENT;
u64 umask = eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK;
int i, index;
index = find_filter_index(events, nevents, event_select);
if (index < 0)
return false;
/*
* Entries are sorted by the event select. Walk the list in both
* directions to process all entries with the targeted event select.
*/
for (i = index; i < nevents; i++) {
if (filter_event_cmp(&events[i], &event_select))
break;
if (is_filter_entry_match(events[i], umask))
return true;
}
for (i = index - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if (filter_event_cmp(&events[i], &event_select))
break;
if (is_filter_entry_match(events[i], umask))
return true;
}
return false;
}
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
static bool is_gp_event_allowed(struct kvm_x86_pmu_event_filter *f,
u64 eventsel)
{
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
if (filter_contains_match(f->includes, f->nr_includes, eventsel) &&
!filter_contains_match(f->excludes, f->nr_excludes, eventsel))
return f->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW;
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
return f->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY;
}
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
static bool is_fixed_event_allowed(struct kvm_x86_pmu_event_filter *filter,
int idx)
{
int fixed_idx = idx - KVM_FIXED_PMC_BASE_IDX;
if (filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY &&
test_bit(fixed_idx, (ulong *)&filter->fixed_counter_bitmap))
return false;
if (filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW &&
!test_bit(fixed_idx, (ulong *)&filter->fixed_counter_bitmap))
return false;
return true;
}
static bool check_pmu_event_filter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
struct kvm_x86_pmu_event_filter *filter;
struct kvm *kvm = pmc->vcpu->kvm;
filter = srcu_dereference(kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter, &kvm->srcu);
if (!filter)
return true;
if (pmc_is_gp(pmc))
return is_gp_event_allowed(filter, pmc->eventsel);
return is_fixed_event_allowed(filter, pmc->idx);
}
static bool pmc_event_is_allowed(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
return pmc_is_globally_enabled(pmc) && pmc_speculative_in_use(pmc) &&
check_pmu_event_filter(pmc);
}
static int reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = pmc_to_pmu(pmc);
u64 eventsel = pmc->eventsel;
u64 new_config = eventsel;
KVM: x86/pmu: Track emulated counter events instead of previous counter Explicitly track emulated counter events instead of using the common counter value that's shared with the hardware counter owned by perf. Bumping the common counter requires snapshotting the pre-increment value in order to detect overflow from emulation, and the snapshot approach is inherently flawed. Snapshotting the previous counter at every increment assumes that there is at most one emulated counter event per emulated instruction (or rather, between checks for KVM_REQ_PMU). That's mostly holds true today because KVM only emulates (branch) instructions retired, but the approach will fall apart if KVM ever supports event types that don't have a 1:1 relationship with instructions. And KVM already has a relevant bug, as handle_invalid_guest_state() emulates multiple instructions without checking KVM_REQ_PMU, i.e. could miss an overflow event due to clobbering pmc->prev_counter. Not checking KVM_REQ_PMU is problematic in both cases, but at least with the emulated counter approach, the resulting behavior is delayed overflow detection, as opposed to completely lost detection. Tracking the emulated count fixes another bug where the snapshot approach can signal spurious overflow due to incorporating both the emulated count and perf's count in the check, i.e. if overflow is detected by perf, then KVM's emulation will also incorrectly signal overflow. Add a comment in the related code to call out the need to process emulated events *after* pausing the perf event (big kudos to Mingwei for figuring out that particular wrinkle). Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Cc: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103230541.352265-7-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2023-11-04 02:05:41 +03:00
bool emulate_overflow;
u8 fixed_ctr_ctrl;
KVM: x86/pmu: Track emulated counter events instead of previous counter Explicitly track emulated counter events instead of using the common counter value that's shared with the hardware counter owned by perf. Bumping the common counter requires snapshotting the pre-increment value in order to detect overflow from emulation, and the snapshot approach is inherently flawed. Snapshotting the previous counter at every increment assumes that there is at most one emulated counter event per emulated instruction (or rather, between checks for KVM_REQ_PMU). That's mostly holds true today because KVM only emulates (branch) instructions retired, but the approach will fall apart if KVM ever supports event types that don't have a 1:1 relationship with instructions. And KVM already has a relevant bug, as handle_invalid_guest_state() emulates multiple instructions without checking KVM_REQ_PMU, i.e. could miss an overflow event due to clobbering pmc->prev_counter. Not checking KVM_REQ_PMU is problematic in both cases, but at least with the emulated counter approach, the resulting behavior is delayed overflow detection, as opposed to completely lost detection. Tracking the emulated count fixes another bug where the snapshot approach can signal spurious overflow due to incorporating both the emulated count and perf's count in the check, i.e. if overflow is detected by perf, then KVM's emulation will also incorrectly signal overflow. Add a comment in the related code to call out the need to process emulated events *after* pausing the perf event (big kudos to Mingwei for figuring out that particular wrinkle). Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Cc: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103230541.352265-7-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2023-11-04 02:05:41 +03:00
emulate_overflow = pmc_pause_counter(pmc);
if (!pmc_event_is_allowed(pmc))
return 0;
KVM: x86/pmu: Track emulated counter events instead of previous counter Explicitly track emulated counter events instead of using the common counter value that's shared with the hardware counter owned by perf. Bumping the common counter requires snapshotting the pre-increment value in order to detect overflow from emulation, and the snapshot approach is inherently flawed. Snapshotting the previous counter at every increment assumes that there is at most one emulated counter event per emulated instruction (or rather, between checks for KVM_REQ_PMU). That's mostly holds true today because KVM only emulates (branch) instructions retired, but the approach will fall apart if KVM ever supports event types that don't have a 1:1 relationship with instructions. And KVM already has a relevant bug, as handle_invalid_guest_state() emulates multiple instructions without checking KVM_REQ_PMU, i.e. could miss an overflow event due to clobbering pmc->prev_counter. Not checking KVM_REQ_PMU is problematic in both cases, but at least with the emulated counter approach, the resulting behavior is delayed overflow detection, as opposed to completely lost detection. Tracking the emulated count fixes another bug where the snapshot approach can signal spurious overflow due to incorporating both the emulated count and perf's count in the check, i.e. if overflow is detected by perf, then KVM's emulation will also incorrectly signal overflow. Add a comment in the related code to call out the need to process emulated events *after* pausing the perf event (big kudos to Mingwei for figuring out that particular wrinkle). Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Cc: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103230541.352265-7-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2023-11-04 02:05:41 +03:00
if (emulate_overflow)
KVM: x86/pmu: Defer counter emulated overflow via pmc->prev_counter Defer reprogramming counters and handling overflow via KVM_REQ_PMU when incrementing counters. KVM skips emulated WRMSR in the VM-Exit fastpath, the fastpath runs with IRQs disabled, skipping instructions can increment and reprogram counters, reprogramming counters can sleep, and sleeping is disallowed while IRQs are disabled. [*] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:580 [*] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 2981888, name: CPU 15/KVM [*] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 [*] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 [*] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [*] irq event stamp: 0 [*] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [*] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff8121222a>] copy_process+0x146a/0x62d0 [*] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff81212269>] copy_process+0x14a9/0x62d0 [*] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [*] Preemption disabled at: [*] [<ffffffffc2063fc1>] vcpu_enter_guest+0x1001/0x3dc0 [kvm] [*] CPU: 17 PID: 2981888 Comm: CPU 15/KVM Kdump: 5.19.0-rc1-g239111db364c-dirty #2 [*] Call Trace: [*] <TASK> [*] dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x9b [*] __might_resched.cold+0x22e/0x297 [*] __mutex_lock+0xc0/0x23b0 [*] perf_event_ctx_lock_nested+0x18f/0x340 [*] perf_event_pause+0x1a/0x110 [*] reprogram_counter+0x2af/0x1490 [kvm] [*] kvm_pmu_trigger_event+0x429/0x950 [kvm] [*] kvm_skip_emulated_instruction+0x48/0x90 [kvm] [*] handle_fastpath_set_msr_irqoff+0x349/0x3b0 [kvm] [*] vmx_vcpu_run+0x268e/0x3b80 [kvm_intel] [*] vcpu_enter_guest+0x1d22/0x3dc0 [kvm] Add a field to kvm_pmc to track the previous counter value in order to defer overflow detection to kvm_pmu_handle_event() (the counter must be paused before handling overflow, and that may increment the counter). Opportunistically shrink sizeof(struct kvm_pmc) a bit. Suggested-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Fixes: 9cd803d496e7 ("KVM: x86: Update vPMCs when retiring instructions") Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220831085328.45489-6-likexu@tencent.com [sean: avoid re-triggering KVM_REQ_PMU on overflow, tweak changelog] Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20220923001355.3741194-5-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-09-23 03:13:55 +03:00
__kvm_perf_overflow(pmc, false);
if (eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_PIN_CONTROL)
printk_once("kvm pmu: pin control bit is ignored\n");
if (pmc_is_fixed(pmc)) {
fixed_ctr_ctrl = fixed_ctrl_field(pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl,
pmc->idx - KVM_FIXED_PMC_BASE_IDX);
if (fixed_ctr_ctrl & 0x1)
eventsel |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_OS;
if (fixed_ctr_ctrl & 0x2)
eventsel |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_USR;
if (fixed_ctr_ctrl & 0x8)
eventsel |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INT;
new_config = (u64)fixed_ctr_ctrl;
}
if (pmc->current_config == new_config && pmc_resume_counter(pmc))
return 0;
KVM: x86/vPMU: Reuse perf_event to avoid unnecessary pmc_reprogram_counter The perf_event_create_kernel_counter() in the pmc_reprogram_counter() is a heavyweight and high-frequency operation, especially when host disables the watchdog (maximum 21000000 ns) which leads to an unacceptable latency of the guest NMI handler. It limits the use of vPMUs in the guest. When a vPMC is fully enabled, the legacy reprogram_*_counter() would stop and release its existing perf_event (if any) every time EVEN in most cases almost the same requested perf_event will be created and configured again. For each vPMC, if the reuqested config ('u64 eventsel' for gp and 'u8 ctrl' for fixed) is the same as its current config AND a new sample period based on pmc->counter is accepted by host perf interface, the current event could be reused safely as a new created one does. Otherwise, do release the undesirable perf_event and reprogram a new one as usual. It's light-weight to call pmc_pause_counter (disable, read and reset event) and pmc_resume_counter (recalibrate period and re-enable event) as guest expects instead of release-and-create again on any condition. Compared to use the filterable event->attr or hw.config, a new 'u64 current_config' field is added to save the last original programed config for each vPMC. Based on this implementation, the number of calls to pmc_reprogram_counter is reduced by ~82.5% for a gp sampling event and ~99.9% for a fixed event. In the usage of multiplexing perf sampling mode, the average latency of the guest NMI handler is reduced from 104923 ns to 48393 ns (~2.16x speed up). If host disables watchdog, the minimum latecy of guest NMI handler could be speed up at ~3413x (from 20407603 to 5979 ns) and at ~786x in the average. Suggested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2019-10-27 13:52:42 +03:00
pmc_release_perf_event(pmc);
pmc->current_config = new_config;
return pmc_reprogram_counter(pmc, PERF_TYPE_RAW,
(eventsel & pmu->raw_event_mask),
!(eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_USR),
!(eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_OS),
eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INT);
}
void kvm_pmu_handle_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
int bit;
bitmap_copy(bitmap, pmu->reprogram_pmi, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
/*
* The reprogramming bitmap can be written asynchronously by something
* other than the task that holds vcpu->mutex, take care to clear only
* the bits that will actually processed.
*/
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(bitmap) != sizeof(atomic64_t));
atomic64_andnot(*(s64 *)bitmap, &pmu->__reprogram_pmi);
kvm_for_each_pmc(pmu, pmc, bit, bitmap) {
/*
* If reprogramming fails, e.g. due to contention, re-set the
* regprogram bit set, i.e. opportunistically try again on the
* next PMU refresh. Don't make a new request as doing so can
* stall the guest if reprogramming repeatedly fails.
*/
if (reprogram_counter(pmc))
set_bit(pmc->idx, pmu->reprogram_pmi);
}
/*
* Unused perf_events are only released if the corresponding MSRs
* weren't accessed during the last vCPU time slice. kvm_arch_sched_in
* triggers KVM_REQ_PMU if cleanup is needed.
*/
if (unlikely(pmu->need_cleanup))
kvm_pmu_cleanup(vcpu);
}
2024-01-10 02:02:27 +03:00
int kvm_pmu_check_rdpmc_early(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx)
{
2024-01-10 02:02:27 +03:00
/*
* On Intel, VMX interception has priority over RDPMC exceptions that
* aren't already handled by the emulator, i.e. there are no additional
* check needed for Intel PMUs.
*
* On AMD, _all_ exceptions on RDPMC have priority over SVM intercepts,
* i.e. an invalid PMC results in a #GP, not #VMEXIT.
*/
if (!kvm_pmu_ops.check_rdpmc_early)
return 0;
return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_check_rdpmc_early)(vcpu, idx);
}
bool is_vmware_backdoor_pmc(u32 pmc_idx)
{
switch (pmc_idx) {
case VMWARE_BACKDOOR_PMC_HOST_TSC:
case VMWARE_BACKDOOR_PMC_REAL_TIME:
case VMWARE_BACKDOOR_PMC_APPARENT_TIME:
return true;
}
return false;
}
static int kvm_pmu_rdpmc_vmware(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx, u64 *data)
{
u64 ctr_val;
switch (idx) {
case VMWARE_BACKDOOR_PMC_HOST_TSC:
ctr_val = rdtsc();
break;
case VMWARE_BACKDOOR_PMC_REAL_TIME:
ctr_val = ktime_get_boottime_ns();
break;
case VMWARE_BACKDOOR_PMC_APPARENT_TIME:
ctr_val = ktime_get_boottime_ns() +
vcpu->kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset;
break;
default:
return 1;
}
*data = ctr_val;
return 0;
}
int kvm_pmu_rdpmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx, u64 *data)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
u64 mask = ~0ull;
if (!pmu->version)
return 1;
if (is_vmware_backdoor_pmc(idx))
return kvm_pmu_rdpmc_vmware(vcpu, idx, data);
pmc = static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc)(vcpu, idx, &mask);
if (!pmc)
return 1;
if (!kvm_is_cr4_bit_set(vcpu, X86_CR4_PCE) &&
(static_call(kvm_x86_get_cpl)(vcpu) != 0) &&
kvm_is_cr0_bit_set(vcpu, X86_CR0_PE))
return 1;
*data = pmc_read_counter(pmc) & mask;
return 0;
}
void kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu)) {
static_call_cond(kvm_x86_pmu_deliver_pmi)(vcpu);
kvm_apic_local_deliver(vcpu->arch.apic, APIC_LVTPC);
}
}
bool kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
{
switch (msr) {
case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS:
case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL:
case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL:
return kvm_pmu_has_perf_global_ctrl(vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu));
default:
break;
}
return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_msr_idx_to_pmc)(vcpu, msr) ||
static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_is_valid_msr)(vcpu, msr);
}
static void kvm_pmu_mark_pmc_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
struct kvm_pmc *pmc = static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_msr_idx_to_pmc)(vcpu, msr);
if (pmc)
__set_bit(pmc->idx, pmu->pmc_in_use);
}
int kvm_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
u32 msr = msr_info->index;
switch (msr) {
case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS:
case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS:
msr_info->data = pmu->global_status;
break;
case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_CTL:
case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL:
msr_info->data = pmu->global_ctrl;
break;
case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS_CLR:
case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL:
msr_info->data = 0;
break;
default:
return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_get_msr)(vcpu, msr_info);
}
return 0;
}
int kvm_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
u32 msr = msr_info->index;
u64 data = msr_info->data;
u64 diff;
/*
* Note, AMD ignores writes to reserved bits and read-only PMU MSRs,
* whereas Intel generates #GP on attempts to write reserved/RO MSRs.
*/
switch (msr) {
case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS:
if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
return 1; /* RO MSR */
fallthrough;
case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS:
/* Per PPR, Read-only MSR. Writes are ignored. */
if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
break;
if (data & pmu->global_status_mask)
return 1;
pmu->global_status = data;
break;
case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_CTL:
data &= ~pmu->global_ctrl_mask;
fallthrough;
case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL:
if (!kvm_valid_perf_global_ctrl(pmu, data))
return 1;
if (pmu->global_ctrl != data) {
diff = pmu->global_ctrl ^ data;
pmu->global_ctrl = data;
reprogram_counters(pmu, diff);
}
break;
case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL:
/*
* GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL, a.k.a. GLOBAL STATUS_RESET, clears bits in
* GLOBAL_STATUS, and so the set of reserved bits is the same.
*/
if (data & pmu->global_status_mask)
return 1;
fallthrough;
case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS_CLR:
if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
pmu->global_status &= ~data;
break;
default:
kvm_pmu_mark_pmc_in_use(vcpu, msr_info->index);
return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_set_msr)(vcpu, msr_info);
}
return 0;
}
static void kvm_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
int i;
pmu->need_cleanup = false;
bitmap_zero(pmu->reprogram_pmi, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
kvm_for_each_pmc(pmu, pmc, i, pmu->all_valid_pmc_idx) {
pmc_stop_counter(pmc);
pmc->counter = 0;
KVM: x86/pmu: Track emulated counter events instead of previous counter Explicitly track emulated counter events instead of using the common counter value that's shared with the hardware counter owned by perf. Bumping the common counter requires snapshotting the pre-increment value in order to detect overflow from emulation, and the snapshot approach is inherently flawed. Snapshotting the previous counter at every increment assumes that there is at most one emulated counter event per emulated instruction (or rather, between checks for KVM_REQ_PMU). That's mostly holds true today because KVM only emulates (branch) instructions retired, but the approach will fall apart if KVM ever supports event types that don't have a 1:1 relationship with instructions. And KVM already has a relevant bug, as handle_invalid_guest_state() emulates multiple instructions without checking KVM_REQ_PMU, i.e. could miss an overflow event due to clobbering pmc->prev_counter. Not checking KVM_REQ_PMU is problematic in both cases, but at least with the emulated counter approach, the resulting behavior is delayed overflow detection, as opposed to completely lost detection. Tracking the emulated count fixes another bug where the snapshot approach can signal spurious overflow due to incorporating both the emulated count and perf's count in the check, i.e. if overflow is detected by perf, then KVM's emulation will also incorrectly signal overflow. Add a comment in the related code to call out the need to process emulated events *after* pausing the perf event (big kudos to Mingwei for figuring out that particular wrinkle). Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Cc: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103230541.352265-7-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2023-11-04 02:05:41 +03:00
pmc->emulated_counter = 0;
if (pmc_is_gp(pmc))
pmc->eventsel = 0;
}
pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl = pmu->global_ctrl = pmu->global_status = 0;
static_call_cond(kvm_x86_pmu_reset)(vcpu);
}
/*
* Refresh the PMU configuration for the vCPU, e.g. if userspace changes CPUID
* and/or PERF_CAPABILITIES.
*/
void kvm_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
if (KVM_BUG_ON(kvm_vcpu_has_run(vcpu), vcpu->kvm))
return;
/*
* Stop/release all existing counters/events before realizing the new
* vPMU model.
*/
kvm_pmu_reset(vcpu);
pmu->version = 0;
pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters = 0;
pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters = 0;
pmu->counter_bitmask[KVM_PMC_GP] = 0;
pmu->counter_bitmask[KVM_PMC_FIXED] = 0;
pmu->reserved_bits = 0xffffffff00200000ull;
pmu->raw_event_mask = X86_RAW_EVENT_MASK;
pmu->global_ctrl_mask = ~0ull;
pmu->global_status_mask = ~0ull;
pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl_mask = ~0ull;
pmu->pebs_enable_mask = ~0ull;
pmu->pebs_data_cfg_mask = ~0ull;
bitmap_zero(pmu->all_valid_pmc_idx, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
if (vcpu->kvm->arch.enable_pmu)
static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_refresh)(vcpu);
}
void kvm_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
memset(pmu, 0, sizeof(*pmu));
static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_init)(vcpu);
kvm_pmu_refresh(vcpu);
}
/* Release perf_events for vPMCs that have been unused for a full time slice. */
void kvm_pmu_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
struct kvm_pmc *pmc = NULL;
DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmask, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
int i;
pmu->need_cleanup = false;
bitmap_andnot(bitmask, pmu->all_valid_pmc_idx,
pmu->pmc_in_use, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
kvm_for_each_pmc(pmu, pmc, i, bitmask) {
if (pmc->perf_event && !pmc_speculative_in_use(pmc))
pmc_stop_counter(pmc);
}
static_call_cond(kvm_x86_pmu_cleanup)(vcpu);
bitmap_zero(pmu->pmc_in_use, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
}
void kvm_pmu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
kvm_pmu_reset(vcpu);
}
static void kvm_pmu_incr_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
KVM: x86/pmu: Track emulated counter events instead of previous counter Explicitly track emulated counter events instead of using the common counter value that's shared with the hardware counter owned by perf. Bumping the common counter requires snapshotting the pre-increment value in order to detect overflow from emulation, and the snapshot approach is inherently flawed. Snapshotting the previous counter at every increment assumes that there is at most one emulated counter event per emulated instruction (or rather, between checks for KVM_REQ_PMU). That's mostly holds true today because KVM only emulates (branch) instructions retired, but the approach will fall apart if KVM ever supports event types that don't have a 1:1 relationship with instructions. And KVM already has a relevant bug, as handle_invalid_guest_state() emulates multiple instructions without checking KVM_REQ_PMU, i.e. could miss an overflow event due to clobbering pmc->prev_counter. Not checking KVM_REQ_PMU is problematic in both cases, but at least with the emulated counter approach, the resulting behavior is delayed overflow detection, as opposed to completely lost detection. Tracking the emulated count fixes another bug where the snapshot approach can signal spurious overflow due to incorporating both the emulated count and perf's count in the check, i.e. if overflow is detected by perf, then KVM's emulation will also incorrectly signal overflow. Add a comment in the related code to call out the need to process emulated events *after* pausing the perf event (big kudos to Mingwei for figuring out that particular wrinkle). Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Cc: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103230541.352265-7-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2023-11-04 02:05:41 +03:00
pmc->emulated_counter++;
kvm_pmu_request_counter_reprogram(pmc);
}
static inline bool cpl_is_matched(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
bool select_os, select_user;
u64 config;
if (pmc_is_gp(pmc)) {
config = pmc->eventsel;
select_os = config & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_OS;
select_user = config & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_USR;
} else {
config = fixed_ctrl_field(pmc_to_pmu(pmc)->fixed_ctr_ctrl,
pmc->idx - KVM_FIXED_PMC_BASE_IDX);
select_os = config & 0x1;
select_user = config & 0x2;
}
return (static_call(kvm_x86_get_cpl)(pmc->vcpu) == 0) ? select_os : select_user;
}
void kvm_pmu_trigger_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 eventsel)
{
DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
int i;
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(pmu->global_ctrl) * BITS_PER_BYTE != X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
if (!kvm_pmu_has_perf_global_ctrl(pmu))
bitmap_copy(bitmap, pmu->all_valid_pmc_idx, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
else if (!bitmap_and(bitmap, pmu->all_valid_pmc_idx,
(unsigned long *)&pmu->global_ctrl, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX))
return;
kvm_for_each_pmc(pmu, pmc, i, bitmap) {
if (!pmc_event_is_allowed(pmc))
continue;
/*
* Ignore checks for edge detect (all events currently emulated
* but KVM are always rising edges), pin control (unsupported
* by modern CPUs), and counter mask and its invert flag (KVM
* doesn't emulate multiple events in a single clock cycle).
*
* Note, the uppermost nibble of AMD's mask overlaps Intel's
* IN_TX (bit 32) and IN_TXCP (bit 33), as well as two reserved
* bits (bits 35:34). Checking the "in HLE/RTM transaction"
* flags is correct as the vCPU can't be in a transaction if
* KVM is emulating an instruction. Checking the reserved bits
* might be wrong if they are defined in the future, but so
* could ignoring them, so do the simple thing for now.
*/
if ((pmc->eventsel ^ eventsel) & AMD64_RAW_EVENT_MASK_NB)
continue;
if (cpl_is_matched(pmc))
kvm_pmu_incr_counter(pmc);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_pmu_trigger_event);
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
static bool is_masked_filter_valid(const struct kvm_x86_pmu_event_filter *filter)
{
u64 mask = kvm_pmu_ops.EVENTSEL_EVENT |
KVM_PMU_MASKED_ENTRY_UMASK_MASK |
KVM_PMU_MASKED_ENTRY_UMASK_MATCH |
KVM_PMU_MASKED_ENTRY_EXCLUDE;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < filter->nevents; i++) {
if (filter->events[i] & ~mask)
return false;
}
return true;
}
static void convert_to_masked_filter(struct kvm_x86_pmu_event_filter *filter)
{
int i, j;
for (i = 0, j = 0; i < filter->nevents; i++) {
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
/*
* Skip events that are impossible to match against a guest
* event. When filtering, only the event select + unit mask
* of the guest event is used. To maintain backwards
* compatibility, impossible filters can't be rejected :-(
*/
if (filter->events[i] & ~(kvm_pmu_ops.EVENTSEL_EVENT |
ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK))
continue;
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
/*
* Convert userspace events to a common in-kernel event so
* only one code path is needed to support both events. For
* the in-kernel events use masked events because they are
* flexible enough to handle both cases. To convert to masked
* events all that's needed is to add an "all ones" umask_mask,
* (unmasked filter events don't support EXCLUDE).
*/
filter->events[j++] = filter->events[i] |
(0xFFULL << KVM_PMU_MASKED_ENTRY_UMASK_MASK_SHIFT);
}
filter->nevents = j;
}
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
static int prepare_filter_lists(struct kvm_x86_pmu_event_filter *filter)
{
int i;
if (!(filter->flags & KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS))
convert_to_masked_filter(filter);
else if (!is_masked_filter_valid(filter))
return -EINVAL;
/*
* Sort entries by event select and includes vs. excludes so that all
* entries for a given event select can be processed efficiently during
* filtering. The EXCLUDE flag uses a more significant bit than the
* event select, and so the sorted list is also effectively split into
* includes and excludes sub-lists.
*/
sort(&filter->events, filter->nevents, sizeof(filter->events[0]),
filter_sort_cmp, NULL);
i = filter->nevents;
/* Find the first EXCLUDE event (only supported for masked events). */
if (filter->flags & KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS) {
for (i = 0; i < filter->nevents; i++) {
if (filter->events[i] & KVM_PMU_MASKED_ENTRY_EXCLUDE)
break;
}
}
filter->nr_includes = i;
filter->nr_excludes = filter->nevents - filter->nr_includes;
filter->includes = filter->events;
filter->excludes = filter->events + filter->nr_includes;
return 0;
}
int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_pmu_event_filter(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp)
{
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
struct kvm_pmu_event_filter __user *user_filter = argp;
struct kvm_x86_pmu_event_filter *filter;
struct kvm_pmu_event_filter tmp;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
unsigned long i;
size_t size;
int r;
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
if (copy_from_user(&tmp, user_filter, sizeof(tmp)))
return -EFAULT;
if (tmp.action != KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW &&
tmp.action != KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY)
return -EINVAL;
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
if (tmp.flags & ~KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAGS_VALID_MASK)
return -EINVAL;
if (tmp.nevents > KVM_PMU_EVENT_FILTER_MAX_EVENTS)
return -E2BIG;
size = struct_size(filter, events, tmp.nevents);
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
filter = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!filter)
return -ENOMEM;
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
filter->action = tmp.action;
filter->nevents = tmp.nevents;
filter->fixed_counter_bitmap = tmp.fixed_counter_bitmap;
filter->flags = tmp.flags;
r = -EFAULT;
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
if (copy_from_user(filter->events, user_filter->events,
sizeof(filter->events[0]) * filter->nevents))
goto cleanup;
KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter When building a list of filter events, it can sometimes be a challenge to fit all the events needed to adequately restrict the guest into the limited space available in the pmu event filter. This stems from the fact that the pmu event filter requires each event (i.e. event select + unit mask) be listed, when the intention might be to restrict the event select all together, regardless of it's unit mask. Instead of increasing the number of filter events in the pmu event filter, add a new encoding that is able to do a more generalized match on the unit mask. Introduce masked events as another encoding the pmu event filter understands. Masked events has the fields: mask, match, and exclude. When filtering based on these events, the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the match value (i.e. umask & mask == match). The exclude bit can then be used to exclude events from that match. E.g. for a given event select, if it's easier to say which unit mask values shouldn't be filtered, a masked event can be set up to match all possible unit mask values, then another masked event can be set up to match the unit mask values that shouldn't be filtered. Userspace can query to see if this feature exists by looking for the capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. This feature is enabled by setting the flags field in the pmu event filter to KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS. Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_ENCODE_MASKED_ENTRY(). It is an error to have a bit set outside the valid bits for a masked event, and calls to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases, including the high bits of the event select (35:32) if called on Intel. With these updates the filter matching code has been updated to match on a common event. Masked events were flexible enough to handle both event types, so they were used as the common event. This changes how guest events get filtered because regardless of the type of event used in the uAPI, they will be converted to masked events. Because of this there could be a slight performance hit because instead of matching the filter event with a lookup on event select + unit mask, it does a lookup on event select then walks the unit masks to find the match. This shouldn't be a big problem because I would expect the set of common event selects to be small, and if they aren't the set can likely be reduced by using masked events to generalize the unit mask. Using one type of event when filtering guest events allows for a common code path to be used. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161236.555143-5-aaronlewis@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
2022-12-20 19:12:33 +03:00
r = prepare_filter_lists(filter);
if (r)
goto cleanup;
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
filter = rcu_replace_pointer(kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter, filter,
mutex_is_locked(&kvm->lock));
mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
synchronize_srcu_expedited(&kvm->srcu);
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(((struct kvm_pmu *)0)->reprogram_pmi) >
sizeof(((struct kvm_pmu *)0)->__reprogram_pmi));
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
atomic64_set(&vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu)->__reprogram_pmi, -1ull);
kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_PMU);
r = 0;
cleanup:
kfree(filter);
return r;
}