IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The LKM04832 "CLKOUT" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Reviewed-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-16-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Use the managed `devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider()` instead of
`of_clk_add_hw_provider()`.
This makes sure the provider gets automatically removed on unbind.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230410014502.27929-6-lars@metafoo.de
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Fix syntax generating the following kernel-doc warnings:
drivers/clk/clk-lmk04832.c:189: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct lmk04832_device_info '
drivers/clk/clk-lmk04832.c:193: warning: Function parameter or member 'pid' not described in 'lmk04832_device_info'
drivers/clk/clk-lmk04832.c:193: warning: Function parameter or member 'maskrev' not described in 'lmk04832_device_info'
drivers/clk/clk-lmk04832.c:193: warning: Function parameter or member 'num_channels' not described in 'lmk04832_device_info'
drivers/clk/clk-lmk04832.c:193: warning: Function parameter or member 'vco0_range' not described in 'lmk04832_device_info'
drivers/clk/clk-lmk04832.c:193: warning: Function parameter or member 'vco1_range' not described in 'lmk04832_device_info'
drivers/clk/clk-lmk04832.c:420: warning: No description found for return value of 'lmk04832_check_vco_ranges'
drivers/clk/clk-lmk04832.c:459: warning: No description found for return value of 'lmk04832_calc_pll2_params'
Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221120030257.531153-5-liambeguin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Fix the following warning reported by the kernel test robot.
cppcheck possible warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>, may not real problems)
>> drivers/clk/clk-lmk04832.c:357:15: warning: Variable 'pll2_p' can be declared with const [constVariable]
unsigned int pll2_p[] = {8, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7};
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202203312017.5YW13Jr4-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221120030257.531153-2-liambeguin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The value returned by an spi driver's remove function is mostly ignored.
(Only an error message is printed if the value is non-zero that the
error is ignored.)
So change the prototype of the remove function to return no value. This
way driver authors are not tempted to assume that passing an error to
the upper layer is a good idea. All drivers are adapted accordingly.
There is no intended change of behaviour, all callbacks were prepared to
return 0 before.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>
Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Claudius Heine <ch@denx.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC
Acked-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220123175201.34839-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
When the body of a case statement is empty, it is well understood that
it is intentional and explicit fallthrough statements are not required.
Drop them.
Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210708211645.3621902-1-liambeguin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
In case of error, the function devm_kzalloc() and devm_kcalloc() return
NULL pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check
should be replaced with NULL test.
Fixes: 3bc61cfd6f ("clk: add support for the lmk04832")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210630020322.2555946-1-wanghai38@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: Liam Beguin <lvb@xiphos.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Presumably we want to use this match table so add a module device table
and set the driver match pointer appropriately.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Liam Beguin <lvb@xiphos.com>
Fixes: 3bc61cfd6f ("clk: add support for the lmk04832")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210629060751.3119453-2-sboyd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The digital delay allows outputs to be delayed from 8 to 1023 VCO
cycles. The delay step can be as small as half the period of the clock
distribution path. For example, a 3.2-GHz VCO frequency results in
156.25-ps steps. The digital delay value takes effect on the clock
output phase after a SYNC event.
This is required to support JESD204B subclass 1.
Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <lvb@xiphos.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210423004057.283926-3-liambeguin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The LMK04832 is an ultra-high performance clock conditioner with JEDEC
JESD204B support and is also pin compatible with the LMK0482x family of
devices.
Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <lvb@xiphos.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210423004057.283926-2-liambeguin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
