IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Pull all the skl+ watermark code (and the dbuf/sagv/ipc code
since it's all sort of intertwined and I'm too lazy to think
of a finer grained split right now) into its own file from the
catch-all intel_pm.c.
Also sneak in the s/dev_priv/i915/ rename while at it.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220908191646.20239-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
No reaon to have this humongous if ladder in intel_read_wm_latency().
Just split it into nicer per-platforms functions.
Also do the s/dev_priv/i915/ while touching all of this code.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220908191646.20239-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
On BDW+ M/N are double buffered and so we can easily reprogram them
during a fastset. So for eDP panels that support seamless DRRS we
can just change these without a full modeset.
For earlier platforms we'd need to play tricks with M1/N1 vs.
M2/N2 during the fastset to make sure we do the switch atomically.
Not sure the added complexity is worth the hassle, so leave it
alone for now.
The slight downside is that we have to keep the link running at
a link rate capable of supporting the highest refresh rate we
want to use. For the moment we just pick the highest mode the
panel reports and calculate the link based on that. This might
need further refinement (eg. if we run into bandwidth
restrictions)...
v2: Only use the high link rate if the platform really supports
the seamless M/N change uring fastset (ie. bdw+)
v3: Rebase due to HAS_DOUBLE_BUFFERED_M_N()
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-16-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Add a function to get the fixed_mode with the highest clock.
The plan is to use this for the link bw calculation on seamless
DRRS panels so that we alwasy end up with the same link params
regardless of the requested refresh rate. This will allow fastset
to do seamless refresh rate changes based on userspace request
instead of having to go for a full modeset.
TODO: the function name isn't great
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-15-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
To make the fastboot checks at least somewhat sensible let's mark
the expected DPLL as the active one right after we finished the
state computation. Otherwise intel_pipe_config_compare() will
always be comparing things against NULL/0.
TODO: This is still not really right. If the previous commit
had to fall back to the other PLL then the comparisong will
now fail. I guess intel_pipe_config_compare() should rather
be comparing port_dplls[] instead. But to do that we really
should just unify every platform to use the port_dplls[]
approach whether they have any need for PLL fallbacks or not.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Now that we no longer fuzz M/N during fastset these should
match exctly.
In order to get a match with what the BIOS does we need to round
M/N down. And we do the opposite rounding when doing the readback.
That gets us pretty much the same thing back.
There can still be slight rounding differences between FDI M/N
vs. the DPLL output so we allow for tiny deviation in
intel_pipe_config_sanity_check().
v2: Tweak rounding/sanity check stuff a bit
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> #v1
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Do the DPLL computation before fastset checks. This should
allow us to get rid of all that horrible fuzzy clock handling
for fastsets. Who knows how many bugs there are caused by our
state not actually matching what the hardware will generate.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Fill port_clock and hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock with the actual
frequency we're going to be getting from the hardware. This will
let us accurately compute all derived state that depends on those.
v2: Reintroduce iCLKIP WARN
v3: Try to deal with VLV/BXT DSI PLL as well
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> #v1
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Only reassign the pipe's DPLL if it's going through a full
.compute_config() cycle. If OTOH it's just getting modeset
eg. in order to change cdclk there doesn't seem much point in
picking a new DPLL for it.
This should also prevent .get_dplls() from seeing a funky port_clock
for DP even in cases where the readout produces a non-standard
clock and we (for some reason) have decided to not fully recompute
the state to remedy the situation.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Currently we calculate a lot of things (pixel rate, watermarks,
cdclk) trusting that the DPLL can generate the exact frequency
we ask it. In practice that is not true and there can be
certain amount of rounding involved.
To allow us to eventually get accurate numbers for all our
DPLL clock derived state we need to move the DPLL calculation
to hapen much earlier. To that end we hoist it up to the just
after the fastset checks. For now we just do the easy code
motion, and the actual back feeding of the final DPLL clock
into the state will come later.
A slight change here is that now .crtc_compute_clock()
can get called while the shared_dpll is still assigned.
But since .crtc_compute_clock() no longer assignes new
shared_dplls this is perfectly fine.
TODO: I'd actually like to do this before the fastset check
so that if the DPLL state should change we actually do the
modeset. Which I think is what the video aficionados want,
but it might not be what the fans of fastboot want. Not yet
sure how to reconcile those conflicting requirements...
v2: s/return/goto/ in error handling
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Currently, pic_height of vdsc_cfg structure is being used to calculate
slice_height, before it is set for DP.
So taking out the lines to set pic_height from the helper
intel_dp_dsc_compute_params() to individual encoders, and setting
pic_height, before it is used to calculate slice_height for DP.
Fixes: 5a6d866f8e1b ("drm/i915: Get slice height before computing rc params")
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220902103219.1168781-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
We have a couple of places that want to make distinction between
double buffered M/N registers vs. the split M1/N1+M2/N2 registers.
Add a helper for that.
v2: Turn into a HAS_ macro (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> #v1
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
This reverts commit 797e2c3f2762c356aadcdb53dd6bb8b8d966f7b5.
Part of a series where patches were modified while applying to resolve
conflicts, leading to further conflicts between drm-misc-next and
drm-intel-next, resulting in build failures in drm-tip. To be applied
again on a baseline with drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next in sync.
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
This reverts commit c6266862de1665b8c8006f58612db2dea66a29f6.
Part of a series where patches were modified while applying to resolve
conflicts, leading to further conflicts between drm-misc-next and
drm-intel-next, resulting in build failures in drm-tip. To be applied
again on a baseline with drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next in sync.
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
This reverts commit 7ae5ab441402b8165de4658ba9398d8378f7dd1e.
Part of a series where patches were modified while applying to resolve
conflicts, leading to further conflicts between drm-misc-next and
drm-intel-next, resulting in build failures in drm-tip. To be applied
again on a baseline with drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next in sync.
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
This reverts commit e1a84ba850128b3984973786829e610ae4ee0e2e.
Part of a series where patches were modified while applying to resolve
conflicts, leading to further conflicts between drm-misc-next and
drm-intel-next, resulting in build failures in drm-tip. To be applied
again on a baseline with drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next in sync.
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Whenever we are not able to get enough timeslots
for required PBN, let's try to allocate those
using DSC, just same way as we do for SST.
v2: Removed intel_dp_mst_dsc_compute_config and refactored
intel_dp_dsc_compute_config to support timeslots as a
parameter(Ville Syrjälä)
v3: - Rebased
- Added a debug to see that we at least try reserving
VCPI slots using DSC, because currently its not visible
from the logs, thus making debugging more tricky.
- Moved timeslots to numerator, where it should be.
v4: - Call drm_dp_mst_atomic_check already during link
config computation, because we need to know already
by this moment if uncompressed amount of VCPI slots
needed can fit, otherwise we need to use DSC.
(thanks to Vinod Govindapillai for pointing this out)
v5: - Put pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes back to original
condition in intel_dp_dsc_compute_config
(don't remember when I lost it)
v6: - Removed unnecessary drm_dp_mst_atomic_check as it is
now always called in a newly introduced
intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp function
(Vinod Govindapillai)
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220905085744.29637-5-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
We would be using almost same code to loop through bpps while calling
drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots - lets remove this duplication by
introducing a new function intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp
v2: Fix pbn_div calculation - shouldn't matter if its DSC or not.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220905085744.29637-4-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
We currently always exit that bpp loop because
drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots doesn't care if we actually
can fit those or not.
I think that wasn't the initial intention here, especially when
we keep trying with lower bpps, we are supposed to keep trying
until we actually find some _working_ configuration, which isn't the
case here.
So added that drm_dp_mst_check here, so that we can make sure
that try all the bpps before we fail.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220905085744.29637-3-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
Adding DP DSC register definitions, we might need for further
DSC implementation, supporting MST and DP branch pass-through mode.
v2: - Fixed checkpatch comment warning
v3: - Removed function which is not yet used(Jani Nikula)
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220905085744.29637-2-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
HPD event after fbdev unregistration can cause registration of deferred
fbdev which will not be unregistered later, causing use-after-free.
To avoid it HPD handling should be suspended before fbdev unregistration.
It should fix following GPF:
[272.634530] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
[272.634536] CPU: 0 PID: 6030 Comm: i915_selftest Tainted: G U 5.18.0-rc5-CI_DRM_11603-g12dccf4f5eef+ #1
[272.634541] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Raptor Lake Client Platform/RPL-S ADP-S DDR5 UDIMM CRB, BIOS RPLSFWI1.R00.2397.A01.2109300731 09/30/2021
[272.634545] RIP: 0010:fb_do_apertures_overlap.part.14+0x26/0x60
...
[272.634582] Call Trace:
[272.634583] <TASK>
[272.634585] do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers+0x59/0xa0
[272.634589] remove_conflicting_framebuffers+0x2d/0xc0
[272.634592] remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers+0xc8/0x110
[272.634595] drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers+0x52/0x70
[272.634604] i915_driver_probe+0x63a/0xdd0 [i915]
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5329
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5510
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220826141929.189681-3-andrzej.hajda@intel.com
i915->hotplug.dig_port_work can be queued from intel_hpd_irq_handler
called by IRQ handler or by intel_hpd_trigger_irq called from dp_mst.
Since dp_mst is suspended after irq handler uninstall, a cleaner approach
is to cancel hpd work after intel_dp_mst_suspend, otherwise we risk
use-after-free.
It should fix following WARNINGS:
[283.405824] cpu_latency_qos_update_request called for unknown object
[283.405866] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 240 at kernel/power/qos.c:296 cpu_latency_qos_update_request+0x2d/0x100
[283.405912] CPU: 2 PID: 240 Comm: kworker/u64:9 Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-Patchwork_103738v3-g1672d1c43e43+ #1
[283.405915] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Raptor Lake Client Platform/RPL-S ADP-S DDR5 UDIMM CRB, BIOS RPLSFWI1.R00.2397.A01.2109300731 09/30/2021
[283.405916] Workqueue: i915-dp i915_digport_work_func [i915]
[283.406020] RIP: 0010:cpu_latency_qos_update_request+0x2d/0x100
...
[283.406040] Call Trace:
[283.406041] <TASK>
[283.406044] intel_dp_aux_xfer+0x60e/0x8e0 [i915]
[283.406131] ? finish_swait+0x80/0x80
[283.406139] intel_dp_aux_transfer+0xc5/0x2b0 [i915]
[283.406218] drm_dp_dpcd_access+0x79/0x130 [drm_display_helper]
[283.406227] drm_dp_dpcd_read+0xe2/0xf0 [drm_display_helper]
[283.406233] intel_dp_hpd_pulse+0x134/0x570 [i915]
[283.406308] ? __down_killable+0x70/0x140
[283.406313] i915_digport_work_func+0xba/0x150 [i915]
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4586
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5558
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220826141929.189681-2-andrzej.hajda@intel.com
The VBT gained some bits to inidicate the max FRL rate for
HDMI 2.1, define them.
These just outright replaced the slave_port bits for ganged eDP.
Apparently that feature was never actually used so someone decided
that reusing the bits is fine. Although the actual ganged eDP
enable bit was still left defined elsewhere for some reason.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220715202044.11153-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Use a more standard form for the VT version number comments.
One slight oddball case is the dp_max_link_rate that had two
version numbers (216/230) and a platform name (GLK). The
story goes that the field was introduced in the spec in
version 216, along with a note that it's used on CNL+. Later
in version 230 the definition of the bit was changed in
bacakwards incompatible ways and the CNL note disappeard.
For us the original CNL+ note in the header got changed to
to GLK+ when all CNL support was dropped from the codebase.
We do still need (and have) handling for both the 216+ and
the 230+ defintions (parse_bdb_216_dp_max_link_rate() vs.
parse_bdb_230_dp_max_link_rate()).
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220715202044.11153-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
