IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Entry flags is meant for the whole entry, including the rule
evaluation. Action flags are for flags applied to the register or
action being taken. Since there's only one action per entry, the
distinction was not important and a u8 was spared. However more and more
workarounds are needing multiple actions. This prepares for multiple
action support.
Right now there are these action flags:
- XE_RTP_ACTION_FLAG_MASKED_REG: register in the action is a masked
register
- XE_RTP_ACTION_FLAG_ENGINE_BASE: the engine base should be added to
the register in order to form the real address
And this entry flag:
- XE_RTP_ENTRY_FLAG_FOREACH_ENGINE: the rules should be evaluated for
each engine on the gt. It also automatically implies
XE_RTP_ACTION_FLAG_ENGINE_BASE.
Since there are likely not that many rules, reduce n_rules to u8 so the
overall entry size doesn't increase more than needed.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
It's true that the struct records the register and the value (in form of
2 masks) to restore, but it also records more fields important to
the application of workarounds/tuning, etc. One important part is what
is the macro used to record these fields: SET/CLR/WR/FIELD_SET/etc.
Thinking of the table as a set of rules + actions is more intuitive than
rules + regval.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Like detailed in commit 927dfdd09d ("drm/i915/dg2: Add SQIDI
steering"), some registers are expected to have the selector
initialized just once and never set to anything else. For xe, the
registers with SQIDI replication type (SF and MCFG) were missing,
resulting in warnings like:
[ 410.685565] xe 0000:03:00.0: Did not find MCR register 0x8724 in any MCR steering table
While adding these registers, abstract the handling for
"dg2_gam_ranges", moving them together with SF/MCFG to a dedicated
table. This also avoids that range to be checked for platforms other
than DG2. For DG2, this is the new steering output:
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gt0/steering
...
IMPLICIT steering: group=0x0, instance=0x0
0x000b00 - 0x000bff
0x001000 - 0x001fff
0x004000 - 0x004aff
0x008700 - 0x0087ff
0x00c800 - 0x00cfff
0x00f000 - 0x00ffff
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
There is already a BUILD_BUG_ON() check to make sure the size follow the
number of steering types. Also make sure the right index is being used
for each steering type.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
The function pointer is already present as match_func, inside
struct xe_rtp_rule and handled as so instead of inside rtp_regval as
originally thought out when this was written.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Now that we issue TLB invalidations on unbinds and rebind from execs we
no longer need to issue TLB invalidations from the ring operations.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
If we add an TLB invalidation fence for rebinds issued from execs we
should be able to drop the TLB invalidation from the ring operations.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Only the GuC should be issuing TLB invalidations if it is enabled. Part
of this patch is sanitize the device on driver unload to ensure we do
not send GuC based TLB invalidations during driver unload.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Endless fences are not good, add a TDR to cleanup any invalidation
fences which have not received an invalidation message within a timeout
period.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
This gets tricky as we can't do the TLB invalidation until the unbind
operation is done on the hardware and we can't signal the unbind as
complete until the TLB invalidation is done. To work around this we
create an unbind fence which does a TLB invalidation after unbind is
done on the hardware, signals on TLB invalidation completion, and this
fence is installed in the BO dma-resv slot and installed in out-syncs
for the unbind operation.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com
Suggested-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
We can't currently do this due to TLB invalidation done handler
expecting the seqno being received in-order, with the fast-path a TLB
invalidation done could pass one being processed in the slow-path in an
extreme corner case. Remove TLB invalidation done from the fast-path for
now and in a follow up reenable this once the TLB invalidation done
handler can deal with out of order seqno.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Scratch page is in VRAM, and therefore requires 64K GTT layout. In GGTT
world this just means having 16 consecutive entries, with 64K GTT
alignment for the GTT address of the first entry (also matching physical
alignment). However to keep things simple just dump it into system
memory, like we already do for ppGTT. While we are here, also give it
known default value.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Spec says we need to use 64K VRAM pages for GGTT on platforms like DG2.
In GGTT this just means aligning the GTT address to 64K and ensuring
that we have 16 consecutive entries each pointing to the respective 4K
entry. We already ensure we have 64K pages underneath, so it's just a
case of forcing the GTT alignment.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On DG2 when running the xe_vm IGT, the kernel generates loads of CAT
errors and GT resets (sometimes at least). On small-bar systems seems
to trigger a lot more easily (maybe due to difference in allocation
strategy). Appears to be related to scratch, since we seem to use the
64K TLB hint on scratch entries, even though the scratch page is a 4K
vram page. Bumping the scratch page size and physical alignment seems
to fix it. Or at least we no longer hit:
[ 148.872683] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] Engine memory cat error: guc_id=0
[ 148.872701] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] Engine memory cat error: guc_id=0
[ 148.875108] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 953 at drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c:797
However to keep things simple, so we don't have to deal with 64K TLB
hints, just move the scratch page into system memory on platforms that
require 64K VRAM pages.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On DGFX this blows up if can call this with a system memory object:
XE_BUG_ON(!mem_type_is_vram(place->mem_type) && place->mem_type != XE_PL_STOLEN);
If we consider dpt it looks like we can already in theory hit this, if
we run out of vram and stolen vram. It at least seems reasonable to
allow calling this on any object which supports CPU access.
Note this also changes the behaviour with stolen VRAM and suspend, such
that we no longer attempt to migrate stolen objects into system memory.
However nothing in stolen should ever need to be restored (same on
integrated), so should be fine. Also on small-bar systems the stolen
portion is pretty much always non-CPU accessible, and currently pinned
objects use plain memcpy when being moved, which doesn't play nicely.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
The comparison with < 0 suggests that the memory device access
should be signed to handle underflow. This makes it work more reliably.
As a result, the max refcount is now S32_MAX instead.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
At present the interrupts are enabled while initializing the last GT.
But this is incorrect for a Multi-GT platform, as root GT initialization
will fail with interrupt disabled. Interrupts are required for
the GuC submission triggered during initialization.
Enable the interrupt during the root GT initialization.
Signed-off-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Some of the tests may benefit from running with ARCH=um, forgoing any
additional setup on the CI build side. Add min config for that.
Tested with:
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build \
--kunitconfig drivers/gpu/drm/xe/.kunitconfig \
--jobs $(nproc) \
--build_dir build_kunit
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
mem_type field was added in commit d8b52a02cb ("drm/xe: Implement
stolen memory.") to designate the TTM memory type for that mgr. Add
kernel-doc with its description.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Fix the following error while building for 32b:
In file included from ../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c:6:
../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c: In function ‘gt_ttm_mgr_init’:
../include/linux/minmax.h:20:35: error: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [-Werror]
20 | (!!(sizeof((typeof(x) *)1 == (typeof(y) *)1)))
| ^~
Cast it to u64 so size of the second operand matches the first one when
building it for 32 bits.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Leave the types as u64, but cast the pointers to unsigned long before
assigning so the compiler doesn't throw warning about casting a pointer
to integer of different size.
Also, size_t should use %zu, not %ld.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
