IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The current sk storage test ensures the memory free works when
the local_storage->smap is NULL.
This patch adds a task storage test to ensure the memory free
code path works when local_storage->smap is NULL.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230322215246.1675516-5-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch uses bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free for allocating and freeing
bpf_local_storage for task and cgroup storage.
The changes are similar to the previous patch. A few things that
worth to mention for bpf_local_storage:
The local_storage is freed when the last selem is deleted.
Before deleting a selem from local_storage, it needs to retrieve the
local_storage->smap because the bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock()
may have set it to NULL. Note that local_storage->smap may have
already been NULL when the selem created this local_storage has
been removed. In this case, call_rcu will be used to free the
local_storage.
Also, the bpf_ma (true or false) value is needed before calling
bpf_local_storage_free(). The bpf_ma can either be obtained from
the local_storage->smap (if available) or any of its selem's smap.
A new helper check_storage_bpf_ma() is added to obtain
bpf_ma for a deleting bpf_local_storage.
When bpf_local_storage_alloc getting a reused memory, all
fields are either in the correct values or will be initialized.
'cache[]' must already be all NULLs. 'list' must be empty.
Others will be initialized.
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230322215246.1675516-4-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch uses bpf_mem_alloc for the task and cgroup local storage that
the bpf prog can easily get a hold of the storage owner's PTR_TO_BTF_ID.
eg. bpf_get_current_task_btf() can be used in some of the kmalloc code
path which will cause deadlock/recursion. bpf_mem_cache_alloc is
deadlock free and will solve a legit use case in [1].
For sk storage, its batch creation benchmark shows a few percent
regression when the sk create/destroy batch size is larger than 32.
The sk creation/destruction happens much more often and
depends on external traffic. Considering it is hypothetical
to be able to cause deadlock with sk storage, it can cross
the bridge to use bpf_mem_alloc till a legit (ie. useful)
use case comes up.
For inode storage, bpf_local_storage_destroy() is called before
waiting for a rcu gp and its memory cannot be reused immediately.
inode stays with kmalloc/kfree after the rcu [or tasks_trace] gp.
A 'bool bpf_ma' argument is added to bpf_local_storage_map_alloc().
Only task and cgroup storage have 'bpf_ma == true' which
means to use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free(). This patch only changes
selem to use bpf_mem_alloc for task and cgroup. The next patch
will change the local_storage to use bpf_mem_alloc also for
task and cgroup.
Here is some more details on the changes:
* memory allocation:
After bpf_mem_cache_alloc(), the SDATA(selem)->data is zero-ed because
bpf_mem_cache_alloc() could return a reused selem. It is to keep
the existing bpf_map_kzalloc() behavior. Only SDATA(selem)->data
is zero-ed. SDATA(selem)->data is the visible part to the bpf prog.
No need to use zero_map_value() to do the zeroing because
bpf_selem_free(..., reuse_now = true) ensures no bpf prog is using
the selem before returning the selem through bpf_mem_cache_free().
For the internal fields of selem, they will be initialized when
linking to the new smap and the new local_storage.
When 'bpf_ma == false', nothing changes in this patch. It will
stay with the bpf_map_kzalloc().
* memory free:
The bpf_selem_free() and bpf_selem_free_rcu() are modified to handle
the bpf_ma == true case.
For the common selem free path where its owner is also being destroyed,
the mem is freed in bpf_local_storage_destroy(), the owner (task
and cgroup) has gone through a rcu gp. The memory can be reused
immediately, so bpf_local_storage_destroy() will call
bpf_selem_free(..., reuse_now = true) which will do
bpf_mem_cache_free() for immediate reuse consideration.
An exception is the delete elem code path. The delete elem code path
is called from the helper bpf_*_storage_delete() and the syscall
bpf_map_delete_elem(). This path is an unusual case for local
storage because the common use case is to have the local storage
staying with its owner life time so that the bpf prog and the user
space does not have to monitor the owner's destruction. For the delete
elem path, the selem cannot be reused immediately because there could
be bpf prog using it. It will call bpf_selem_free(..., reuse_now = false)
and it will wait for a rcu tasks trace gp before freeing the elem. The
rcu callback is changed to do bpf_mem_cache_raw_free() instead of kfree().
When 'bpf_ma == false', it should be the same as before.
__bpf_selem_free() is added to do the kfree_rcu and call_tasks_trace_rcu().
A few words on the 'reuse_now == true'. When 'reuse_now == true',
it is still racing with bpf_local_storage_map_free which is under rcu
protection, so it still needs to wait for a rcu gp instead of kfree().
Otherwise, the selem may be reused by slab for a totally different struct
while the bpf_local_storage_map_free() is still using it (as a
rcu reader). For the inode case, there may be other rcu readers also.
In short, when bpf_ma == false and reuse_now == true => vanilla rcu.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221118190109.1512674-1-namhyung@kernel.org/
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230322215246.1675516-3-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch adds a few bpf mem allocator functions which will
be used in the bpf_local_storage in a later patch.
bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags(..., gfp_t flags) is added. When the
flags == GFP_KERNEL, it will fallback to __alloc(..., GFP_KERNEL).
bpf_local_storage knows its running context is sleepable (GFP_KERNEL)
and provides a better guarantee on memory allocation.
bpf_local_storage has some uncommon cases that its selem
cannot be reused immediately. It handles its own
rcu_head and goes through a rcu_trace gp and then free it.
bpf_mem_cache_raw_free() is added for direct free purpose
without leaking the LLIST_NODE_SZ internal knowledge.
During free time, the 'struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma' is no longer
available. However, the caller should know if it is
percpu memory or not and it can call different raw_free functions.
bpf_local_storage does not support percpu value, so only
the non-percpu 'bpf_mem_cache_raw_free()' is added in
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230322215246.1675516-2-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Eduard Zingerman says:
====================
This is a follow up for RFC [1]. It migrates a first batch of 38
verifier/*.c tests to inline assembly and use of ./test_progs for
actual execution. The migration is done by a python script (see [2]).
Each migrated verifier/xxx.c file is mapped to progs/verifier_xxx.c
plus an entry in the prog_tests/verifier.c. One patch per each file.
A few patches at the beginning of the patch-set extend test_loader
with necessary functionality, mainly:
- support for tests execution in unprivileged mode;
- support for test runs for test programs.
Migrated tests could be selected for execution using the following filter:
./test_progs -a verifier_*
An example of the migrated test:
SEC("xdp")
__description("XDP pkt read, pkt_data' > pkt_end, corner case, good access")
__success __retval(0) __flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
__naked void end_corner_case_good_access_1(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[xdp_md_data]); \
r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[xdp_md_data_end]); \
r1 = r2; \
r1 += 8; \
if r1 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
r0 = *(u64*)(r1 - 8); \
l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
exit; \
" :
: __imm_const(xdp_md_data, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)),
__imm_const(xdp_md_data_end, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end))
: __clobber_all);
}
Changes compared to RFC:
- test_loader.c is extended to support test program runs;
- capabilities handling now matches behavior of test_verifier;
- BPF_ST_MEM instructions are automatically replaced by BPF_STX_MEM
instructions to overcome current clang limitations;
- tests styling updates according to RFC feedback;
- 38 migrated files are included instead of 1.
I used the following means for testing:
- migration tool itself has a set of self-tests;
- migrated tests are passing;
- manually compared each old/new file side-by-side.
While doing side-by-side comparison I've noted a few defects in the
original tests:
- and.c:
- One of the jump targets is off by one;
- BPF_ST_MEM wrong OFF/IMM ordering;
- array_access.c:
- BPF_ST_MEM wrong OFF/IMM ordering;
- value_or_null.c:
- BPF_ST_MEM wrong OFF/IMM ordering.
These defects would be addressed separately.
[1] RFC
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230123145148.2791939-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
[2] Migration tool
https://github.com/eddyz87/verifier-tests-migrator
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Test verifier/direct_stack_access_wraparound.c automatically converted to use inline assembly.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230325025524.144043-18-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
prog_tests/verifier.c would be used as a host for verifier/*.c tests
migrated to use inline assembly and run from test_progs.
The run_test_aux() function mimics the test_verifier behavior
dropping CAP_SYS_ADMIN upon entry.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230325025524.144043-6-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Extends test_loader.c:test_loader__run_subtests() by allowing to
execute BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN bpf command for selected programs.
This is similar to functionality provided by test_verifier.
Adds the following new attributes controlling test_loader behavior:
__retval(...)
__retval_unpriv(...)
* If any of these attributes is present, the annotated program would
be executed using libbpf's bpf_prog_test_run_opts() function.
* If __retval is present, the test run would be done for program
loaded in privileged mode.
* If __retval_unpriv is present, the test run would be done for
program loaded in unprivileged mode.
* To mimic test_verifier behavior, the actual run is initiated in
privileged mode.
* The value returned by a test run is compared against retval
parameter.
The retval attribute takes one of the following parameters:
- a decimal number
- a hexadecimal number (must start from '0x')
- any of a three special literals (provided for compatibility with
test_verifier):
- INT_MIN
- POINTER_VALUE
- TEST_DATA_LEN
An example of the attribute usage:
SEC("socket")
__description("return 42")
__success __success_unpriv __retval(42)
__naked void the_42_test(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
r0 = 42; \
exit; \
" ::: __clobber_all);
}
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230325025524.144043-5-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Extends test_loader.c:test_loader__run_subtests() by allowing to
execute tests in unprivileged mode, similar to test_verifier.c.
Adds the following new attributes controlling test_loader behavior:
__msg_unpriv
__success_unpriv
__failure_unpriv
* If any of these attributes is present the test would be loaded in
unprivileged mode.
* If only "privileged" attributes are present the test would be loaded
only in privileged mode.
* If both "privileged" and "unprivileged" attributes are present the
test would be loaded in both modes.
* If test has to be executed in both modes, __msg(text) is specified
and __msg_unpriv is not specified the behavior is the same as if
__msg_unpriv(text) is specified.
* For test filtering purposes the name of the program loaded in
unprivileged mode is derived from the usual program name by adding
`@unpriv' suffix.
Also adds attribute '__description'. This attribute specifies text to
be used instead of a program name for display and filtering purposes.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230325025524.144043-4-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Change test_loader.c:run_subtest() behavior to show BPF program name
when test spec for that program can't be parsed.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230325025524.144043-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
David Vernet says:
====================
When a map value is being freed, we loop over all of the fields of the
corresponding BPF object and issue the appropriate cleanup calls
corresponding to the field's type. If the field is a referenced kptr, we
atomically xchg the value out of the map, and invoke the kptr's
destructor on whatever was there before.
Currently, we always invoke the destructor (or bpf_obj_drop() for a
local kptr) on any kptr, including if no value was xchg'd out of the
map. This means that any function serving as the kptr's KF_RELEASE
destructor must always treat the argument as possibly NULL, and we
invoke unnecessary (and seemingly unsafe) cleanup logic for the local
kptr path as well.
This is an odd requirement -- KF_RELEASE kfuncs that are invoked by BPF
programs do not have this restriction, and the verifier will fail to
load the program if the register containing the to-be-released type has
any untrusted modifiers (e.g. PTR_UNTRUSTED or PTR_MAYBE_NULL). So as to
simplify the expectations required for a KF_RELEASE kfunc, this patch
set updates the KPTR_REF destructor logic to only be invoked when a
non-NULL value is xchg'd out of the map.
Additionally, the patch removes now-unnecessary KF_RELEASE calls from
several kfuncs, and finally, updates the verifier to have KF_RELEASE
automatically imply KF_TRUSTED_ARGS. This restriction was already
implicitly happening because of the aforementioned logic in the verifier
to reject any regs with untrusted modifiers, and to enforce that
KF_RELEASE args are passed with a 0 offset. This change just updates the
behavior to match that of other trusted args. This patch is left to the
end of the series in case it happens to be controversial, as it arguably
is slightly orthogonal to the purpose of the rest of the series.
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
KF_RELEASE kfuncs are not currently treated as having KF_TRUSTED_ARGS,
even though they have a superset of the requirements of KF_TRUSTED_ARGS.
Like KF_TRUSTED_ARGS, KF_RELEASE kfuncs require a 0-offset argument, and
don't allow NULL-able arguments. Unlike KF_TRUSTED_ARGS which require
_either_ an argument with ref_obj_id > 0, _or_ (ref->type &
BPF_REG_TRUSTED_MODIFIERS) (and no unsafe modifiers allowed), KF_RELEASE
only allows for ref_obj_id > 0. Because KF_RELEASE today doesn't
automatically imply KF_TRUSTED_ARGS, some of these requirements are
enforced in different ways that can make the behavior of the verifier
feel unpredictable. For example, a KF_RELEASE kfunc with a NULL-able
argument will currently fail in the verifier with a message like, "arg#0
is ptr_or_null_ expected ptr_ or socket" rather than "Possibly NULL
pointer passed to trusted arg0". Our intention is the same, but the
semantics are different due to implemenetation details that kfunc authors
and BPF program writers should not need to care about.
Let's make the behavior of the verifier more consistent and intuitive by
having KF_RELEASE kfuncs imply the presence of KF_TRUSTED_ARGS. Our
eventual goal is to have all kfuncs assume KF_TRUSTED_ARGS by default
anyways, so this takes us a step in that direction.
Note that it does not make sense to assume KF_TRUSTED_ARGS for all
KF_ACQUIRE kfuncs. KF_ACQUIRE kfuncs can have looser semantics than
KF_RELEASE, with e.g. KF_RCU | KF_RET_NULL. We may want to have
KF_ACQUIRE imply KF_TRUSTED_ARGS _unless_ KF_RCU is specified, but that
can be left to another patch set, and there are no such subtleties to
address for KF_RELEASE.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230325213144.486885-4-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
