IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This is useful for distributions, where the stability of interface names should
be preseved after an upgrade of systemd. So when some specific release of the
distro is made available, systemd defaults to the latest & greatest naming
scheme, and subsequent updates set the same default. This default may still
be overriden through the kernel and env var options.
A special value "latest" is also allowed. Without a specific name, it is harder
to verride from meson. In case of 'combo' options, meson reads the default
during the initial configuration, and "remembers" this choice. When systemd is
updated, old build/ directories could keep the old default, which would be
annoying. Hence, "latest" is introduced to make it explicit, yet follow the
upstream. This is actually useful for the user too, because it may be used
as an override, without having to actually specify a version.
With this we can stabilize how naming works for network interfaces. A
user can request through a kernel cmdline option or an env var which
scheme to follow. The idea is that installers use this to set into stone
(a very soft stone though) the scheme used during installation so that
interface naming doesn't change afterwards anymore.
Why use env vars and kernel cmdline options, and not a config file of
its own?
Well, first of all there's no obvious existing one to use. But more
importantly: I have the feeling that this logic is kind of an incomplete
hack, and I simply don't want to do advertise this as a perfectly
working solution. So far we used env vars for the non-so-official
options and proper config files for the official stuff. Given how
incomplete this logic is (i.e. the big variable for naming remains the
kernel, which might expose sysfs attributes in newer versions that we
check for and didn't exist in older versions — and other problems like
this), I am simply not confident in giving this first-class exposure in
a primary configuration file.
Fixes: #10448
We would describe tmpfiles.d through what systemd-tmpfiles does with them, but
I think it's better to start with a geneneral statement what they are. Also,
let's make the description of volatile file systems less prominent.
Also, strenghten the advice to use RuntimeDirectory and mention
{Cache,Logs,Configuration,State}Directory=.
I think it is OK if some option is described as "similar to ..., but in
addition ...", as long as the "in addition" part is strictly additive this is
unambiguous. Otherwise, we'd have to repeat a lot of text, and then we'd
probably forget to adjust some of the descriptions when doing changes.
But when the "in addition" part is about replacing or removing parts of
functionality, it is better to avoid this pattern and describe the later option
from scratch.
Some paragraph breaks are added and minor changes made. UID/GID is changed to
user/group, since we generally expect user/group names to be used, not numeric
ids.
Fixes#11115.
Before:
Assertion 'mknod(devname, mode, devnum) == 0' failed at ../src/test/test-udev.c:116, function run(). Aborting.
Assertion 'unlink(devname) == 0' failed at ../src/test/test-udev.c:118, function run(). Aborting.
After:
mknod() failed for '/dev/sda': Operation not permitted
unlink('/dev/sda') failed: No such file or directory
cg_ns_supported() caches, so the condition was really checked just once, but
it looks weird to assign the return value to arg_use_cgns (if the variable is not present),
because then the other checks are effectively equivalent to
if (cg_ns_supported() && cg_ns_supported()) { ...
and later
if (!cg_ns_supported() || !cg_ns_supported()) { ...
This imports the wiki page for predictable interface names. I think it's
useful to preserve history here because it's a contentious subject, and
it's useful to know when what happened.
