IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This allows loading the X.509 certificate from an OpenSSL provider
instead of a file system path. This allows loading certficates directly
from hardware tokens instead of having to export them to a file on
disk first.
<!-- devel-freezer =
{"comment-id":"2460915782","freezing-tag":"v257-rc1"} -->
This verb writes a public key to stdout extracted from either a public key
path, from a certificate (path or provider) or from a private key (path,
engine, provider). We'll use this in ukify to get rid of the use of the
python cryptography module to convert a private key or certificate to a
public key.
This allows loading the X.509 certificate from an OpenSSL provider
instead of a file system path. This allows loading certficates directly
from hardware tokens instead of having to export them to a file on
disk first.
Most people are probably on stable releases, but we don't want to update the
minor version all the time, so just specify 256.x as a hint to fill in the
full version.
I very much dislike the approach in which we were mixing Linux and UEFI C code
in the same subdirectory. No code was shared between two environments. This
layout was created in e7dd673d1e, with the
justification of "being more consistent with the rest of systemd", but I don't
see how it's supposed to be so.
Originally, when the C code was just a single bootctl.c file, this wasn't so
bad. But over time the userspace code grew quite a bit. With the moves done in
previuos commits, the intermediate subdirectory is now empty except for the
efi/ subdir, and this additional subdirectory level doesn't have a good
justification. The components is called "systemd-boot", not "systemd-efi", and
we can remove one level of indentation.
We have other subdirectories with just a single C file. And I expect
that systemd-measure will only grow over time, adding new functionality.
It's nicer to give its own subdirectory to maintain consistent structure.
We'd log that we're skipping the target, but it would never actually get
removed from the manager's list. Thus, we'd advertise targets that don't
actually exist to clients.
In the original version of the sysupdated PR, this was handled by
removing the target from the manager's list in target_free, and using a
_cleanup_ attribute to free the target when skipping. However, this
changed at some point during review. So, this commit takes the
alternative approach