IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We already copy at most sizeof(request.data.auth_crap.lm_resp) bytes to the
lm_resp buffer, but we don't cap the length indicator.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15072
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
With WBFLAG_BIG_NTLMV2_BLOB being set plus lm_resp_len too large you
can crash winbind. We don't independently check lm_resp_len
sufficiently.
Discovered via Coverity ID 1504444 Out-of-bounds access
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15072
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
The winbindd_dual_pam_auth_crap() function will be converted to a local
RPC call handler and it won't receive a winbindd_cli_state struct. Move
the checks accessing this struct to the parent.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Cabrero <scabrero@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 74a511a8ea)
This avoids sending new or reset passwords in the clear
(integrity protected only) from samba-tool in particular.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15315
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
* CVE-2023-0614 Not-secret but access controlled LDAP attributes can be discovered (bug 15270)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
[abartlet@samba.org Adapted to LDB 2.5 series in Samba 4.16]
Setting the LDB_HANDLE_FLAG_UNTRUSTED tells the acl_read module to operate on this request.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
The chain for transitive evaluation does consider ACLs, avoiding the disclosure of
confidential information.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This will allow our dsdb helper search functions to mark the new
request as untrusted, forcing read ACL evaluation (per current behaviour).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
[abartlet@samba.org adapted due to Samba 4.16 and lower
not having the patches for CVE-2022-32743]
In the unlikely case that someone adds a confidential indexed attribute
to the schema, LDAP search expressions on that attribute could disclose
information via timing differences. Let's not use the index for searches
on confidential attributes.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Redaction may be expensive if we end up needing to fetch a security
descriptor to verify rights to an attribute. Checking the search scope
is probably cheaper, so do that first.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This makes it less likely that we forget to handle a case.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If the AS_SYSTEM control is present, we know we have system privileges,
and have no need to call dsdb_module_am_system().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Add a hook, acl_redact_msg_for_filter(), in the aclread module, that
marks inaccessible any message elements used by an LDAP search filter
that the user has no right to access. Make the various ldb_match_*()
functions check whether message elements are accessible, and refuse to
match any that are not. Remaining message elements, not mentioned in the
search filter, are checked in aclread_callback(), and any inaccessible
elements are removed at this point.
Certain attributes, namely objectClass, distinguishedName, name, and
objectGUID, are always present, and hence the presence of said
attributes is always allowed to be checked in a search filter. This
corresponds with the behaviour of Windows.
Further, we unconditionally allow the attributes isDeleted and
isRecycled in a check for presence or equality. Windows is not known to
make this special exception, but it seems mostly harmless, and should
mitigate the performance impact on searches made by the show_deleted
module.
As a result of all these changes, our behaviour regarding confidential
attributes happens to match Windows more closely. For the test in
confidential_attr.py, we can now model our attribute handling with
DC_MODE_RETURN_ALL, which corresponds to the behaviour exhibited by
Windows.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
[abartlet@samba.org adapted due to Samba 4.17 and lower
not having the patches for CVE-2020-25720 and 4.16 and lower
not having the patches for CVE-2022-32743 ]
These variables are often used together, and it is useful to have the
setup code in one place.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
[abartlet@samba.org adapted to the use of
acl_check_access_on_attribute as
acl_check_access_on_attribute_implicit_owner is
only in Samba 4.18 and newer]
This function parses a SID from an ldb_message, similar to
samdb_result_dom_sid(), but does it without allocating anything.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
[abartlet@samba.org Adapted for simple conflicts due to
56297449f9 trimming
trailing whitespace]
DSDB_CONTROL_CALCULATED_DEFAULT_SD_OID was added in commit
08187833fe.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
DSDB_CONTROL_FORCE_ALLOW_VALIDATED_DNS_HOSTNAME_SPN_WRITE_OID was added
to source4/dsdb/samdb/samdb.h in commit
c2ab1f4696.
DSDB_EXTENDED_SCHEMA_LOAD was added in commit
1fd4cdfafa.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 672ec6135f)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
[abartlet@samba.org This required as context for the above bug]
The object returned by schema_format_value() is a bytes object.
Therefore the search expression would resemble:
(lastKnownParent=<GUID=b'00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000'>)
which, due to the extra characters, would fail to match anything.
Fix it to be:
(lastKnownParent=<GUID=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000>)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
In extended_dn_fix_filter() we had:
req->op.search.tree = ldb_parse_tree_copy_shallow(req, req->op.search.tree);
which overwrote the parse tree on an existing ldb request with a fixed
up tree. This became a problem if a module performed another search with
that same request structure, as extended_dn_in would try to fix up the
already-modified tree for a second time. The fixed-up tree element now
having an extended DN, it would fall foul of the ldb_dn_match_allowed()
check in extended_dn_filter_callback(), and be replaced with an
ALWAYS_FALSE match rule. In practice this meant that <GUID={}> searches
would only work for one search in an ldb request, and fail for
subsequent ones.
Fix this by creating a new request with the modified tree, and leaving
the original request unmodified.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Change all uses of ldb_kv_filter_attrs() to use
ldb_filter_attrs_in_place() instead. This function does less work than
its predecessor, and no longer requires the allocation of a second ldb
message. Some of the work is able to be split out into separate
functions that each accomplish a single task, with a purpose to make the
code clearer.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
ldb_filter_attrs() previously did too much. Now its replacement,
ldb_filter_attrs_in_place(), only does the actual filtering, while
taking ownership of each element's values is handled in a separate
function, ldb_msg_elements_take_ownership().
Also, ldb_filter_attrs_in_place() no longer adds the distinguishedName
to the message if it is missing. That is handled in another function,
ldb_msg_add_distinguished_name().
As we're now modifying the original message rather than copying it into
a new one, we no longer need the filtered_msg parameter.
We adapt a test, based on ldb_filter_attrs_test, to exercise the new
function.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
At present this function is an exact duplicate of ldb_filter_attrs(),
but in the next commit we shall modify it to work in place, without the
need for the allocation of a second message.
The test is a near duplicate of the existing test for
ldb_filter_attrs().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Many places in Samba depend upon various components of an ldb message
being talloc allocated, and hence able to be used as talloc contexts.
The elements and values of an unpacked ldb message point to unowned data
inside the memory-mapped database, and this function ensures that such
messages have talloc ownership of said elements and values.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Add ldb_filter_attrs_test to the list of tests so that it actually gets
run.
Remove a duplicate ldb_msg_test that was accidentally added in commit
5ca90e758a.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If the value of an ldb message element is not zero-terminated, calling
ldb_msg_find_attr_as_string() will cause the function to read off the
end of the buffer in an attempt to verify that the value is
zero-terminated. This can cause unexpected behaviour and make the test
randomly fail.
To avoid this, we must have a terminating null byte that is *not*
counted as part of the length, and so we must calculate the length with
strlen() rather than sizeof.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
[abartlet@samba.org Adapted to code without newer
acl_check_access_on_attribute_implicit_owner name]
It is better to explicitly abort than to dereference a NULL pointer or
try to read data cast to the wrong type.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
[abartlet@samba.org Updated to add const to sec_access_check_ds()
instead of the sec_access_check_ds_implicit_owner() wrapper
found in 4.18 and later]
This changes the slow aspect to be the object matching not the filter parsing.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This reduces the elapsed time to 6m from 20m on my laptop.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15332
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Mar 14 07:16:04 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
(cherry picked from commit b4a6c054ec)
[abartlet@samba.org Included in the security release as this
makes working on the large_ldap test practical by reducing
the elapsed time taken]
The value can be quite large, the allocation will take much
longer than the actual match and is repeated per candidate
record.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15331
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit cad96f59a0)
[abartlet@samba.org Included in the security release as this
makes the new large_ldap.py timeout test more reliable]
In macOS Ventura marshalling of kMDScopeArray in the "openQueryWithParams"
request has changed from
string: kMDScopeArray
sl_array_t(#1): {
string: /foo/bar
}
to:
string: kMDScopeArray
sl_array_t(#1): {
sl_array_t(#1): {
string: /foo/bar
}
}
With this patch we check both encodings. Bug fixed according to user feedback.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15299
RN: Spotlight doesn't work with latest macOS Ventura
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1dd0cd2f4e)
Autobuild-User(v4-16-test): Jule Anger <janger@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(v4-16-test): Fri Feb 10 12:15:02 UTC 2023 on sn-devel-184
The FreeBSD extattr API may return success and truncated
namelist. We need to check for this in bsd_attr_list to
ensure that we don't accidentally read off the end of the
buffer. In the case of a truncated value, the pascal
strings for attr names will reflect the lengths as if
the value were not truncated. For example:
`58DosStrea`
In case of short read we now set error to ERANGE and
fail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15271
Signed-off-by: Andrew Walker <awalker@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Jan 2 14:27:23 UTC 2023 on sn-devel-184
(cherry picked from commit 01cdc5e00b)
Autobuild-User(v4-16-test): Jule Anger <janger@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(v4-16-test): Mon Jan 23 10:59:28 UTC 2023 on sn-devel-184
Currently all fsctls we implement need the base fsp, not
an alternate data stream fsp. We may revisit this later
if we implement fsctls that operate on an ADS.
Remove knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15236
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Walker <awalker@ixsystems.com>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Nov 14 18:13:31 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
(cherry picked from commit fa4eba131b)
