IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Add tests for regular access.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12721
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Mar 28 17:05:27 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
(cherry picked from commit 4e734fcd1b)
Use the cwd_name parameter to reconstruct the original
client name for symlink testing.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12721
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit e182a4d39e)
Add an extra paramter to cwd_name to check_reduced_name().
If cwd_name == NULL then fname is a client given path relative
to the root path of the share.
If cwd_name != NULL then fname is a client given path relative
to cwd_name. cwd_name is relative to the root path of the share.
Not yet used, logic added in the next commit.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12721
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 83e30cb488)
In a UNIX filesystem, the names "." and ".." by definition can *never*
be symlinks - they are already reserved names.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12721
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit ae17bebd25)
Add tests for regular access.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12721
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Mar 28 17:05:27 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
(cherry picked from commit 4e734fcd1b)
Autobuild-User(v4-4-test): Karolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(v4-4-test): Wed Mar 29 13:57:56 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
Use the cwd_name parameter to reconstruct the original
client name for symlink testing.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12721
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit e182a4d39e)
Add an extra paramter to cwd_name to check_reduced_name().
If cwd_name == NULL then fname is a client given path relative
to the root path of the share.
If cwd_name != NULL then fname is a client given path relative
to cwd_name. cwd_name is relative to the root path of the share.
Not yet used, logic added in the next commit.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12721
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 83e30cb488)
In a UNIX filesystem, the names "." and ".." by definition can *never*
be symlinks - they are already reserved names.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12721
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit ae17bebd25)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12628
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Mar 15 20:04:32 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
(cherry picked from commit 1c4b15aa5f)
Autobuild-User(v4-4-test): Karolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(v4-4-test): Fri Mar 24 12:35:06 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
dptr_CloseDir() will close and invalidate the fsp's file descriptor, we
have to reopen it.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12496
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Some options MUST be set in the global section, better document that.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12615
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0c212c50b5)
I noticed smbd can get stuck in an open() call with kernel oplocks
enabled and named streams (provided by vfs_streams_xattr):
- client opens a file and with an exclusive oplock
- client starts writing to the file
- client opens an existing stream of the file
- the smbd process gets stuck in an open()
What happens is:
we had setup a locking.tdb record watch in defer_open(), the watch was
triggered, we reattempted the open and got stuck in a blocking open
because the oplock holder (ourselves) hadn't given up the oplock yet.
Cf e576bf5310 for the commit that added
the kernel oplock retry logic. tldr: with kernel oplocks the first open
is non-blocking, but the second one is blocking.
Detailed analysis follows.
When opening a named stream of a file, Samba internally opens the
underlying "base" file first. This internal open of the basefile suceeds
and does *not* trigger an oplock break (because it is an internal open
that doesn't call open() at all) but it is added as an entry to the
locking.tdb record of the file.
Next, the stream open ends up in streams_xattr where a non-blocking
open() on the base file is called. This open fails with EWOULDBLOCK
because we have another fd with a kernel oplock on the file.
So we call defer_open() which sets up a watch on the locking.tdb record.
In the subsequent error unwinding code in open_file_ntcreate() and
callers we close the internal open file handle of the basefile which
also removes the entry from the locking.tdb record and so *changes the
record*.
This fires the record watch and in the callback defer_open_done() we
don't check whether the condition (oplock gone) we're interested in is
actually met. The callback blindly reschedules the open request with
schedule_deferred_open_message_smb().
schedule_deferred_open_message_smb() schedules an immediate tevent event
which has precedence over the IPC fd events in messaging, so the open is
always (!) reattempted before processing the oplock break message.
As explained above, this second open will be a blocking one so we get
stuck in a blocking open.
It doesn't help to make all opens non-blocking, that would just result
in a busy loop failing the open, as we never process the oplock break
message (remember, schedule_deferred_open_message_smb() used immediate
tevent events).
To fix this we must add some logic to the record watch callback to check
whether the record watch was done for a kernel oplock file and if yes,
check if the oplock state changed. If not, simply reschedule the
deferred open and keep waiting.
This logic is only needed for kernel oplocks, not for Samba-level
oplocks, because there's no risk of deadlocking, the worst that can
happen is a rescheduled open that fails again in the oplock checks and
gets deferred again.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7537
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(backported from commit b35a296a27)
No change in behaviour. Update the function comment explaining how it
works and relies on lck for a record watch.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7537
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(backported from commit 1a6c82e5d5)
schedule_async_open() was calling defer_open with sharemode lock = NULL,
as a result there was never an active 20 s timeout.
This has been broken since the commits in
$ git log --reverse -p -10 8283fd0e00
Just roll our own deferred record instead of calling defer_open() and
also set up timer that, as a last resort, catches stuck opens and just
exits for now.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7537
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit ad8c36125f)
Add a new function that does an immediate open rescheduling.
The first deferred open this commit changes was never scheduled, as the
scheduling relies on a timeout of the watch on the sharemode lock.
This has been broken since the commits in
$ git log --reverse -p -10 8283fd0e00
That patchset added the dbwrap watch record logic to defer_open() and
removed the timers.
I'm doing this mainly to untangle the defer_open() logic which is
complicated by the lck arg.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7537
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit beaba62228)
Add a helper function deferred_open_record_create() that creates a
deferred_open_record and let all callers pass all needed arguments
individually.
While we're at it, enhance the debug message in defer_open() to print
all variables.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7537
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit b17ff9b181)
